News & Commentary You Can't Buy...

View from the Street

Trump administration wildlife council mostly hunting advocates | ABC News

Trophy Hunting: Woman Shoots Giraffe, Poses Triumphantly With Corpse | Huffington Post

U.N. experts: Seattle-area activist’s deportation proceedings appear to be retaliation
February 14, 2018 Seattle Times

Records: Washington officials gave activist's info to ICE
February 16, 2018 - Associated Press

What You Should Know About Trump’s Nihilist Budget
February 12, 2018 - by Zach Carter, Arthur Delaney, and Igor Bobic - Huffington Post

Abbreviated pundit roundup: White House unveils cruel and fiscally irresponsible budget
February 13, 2018 - by Georgia Logothetis - Daily Kos

Trump wants to slash food stamps and replace them with a ‘Blue Apron-type program’
February 13, 2018 - by Caitlin Dewey - The Washington Post

Trump wants to overhaul America’s safety net with giant cuts to housing, food stamps and health care
February 12, 2018 - by Tracy Jan, Caitlin Dewey, Amy Goldstein and Jeff Stein - The Washington Post

Report: The Trump Administration Really Has Very Little Use for Scientists
January 24, 2018 - Mother Jones

Millions of Americans Believe God Made Trump President
A surprisingly fascinating book explains why.
By AMY SULLIVAN - January 27, 2018 - Politico Magazine

Ursula K. Le Guin, Acclaimed for Her Fantasy Fiction, Is Dead at 88
January 23, 2018 by Gerald Jonas - The New York Times

In addition to more than 20 novels, she was the author of a dozen books of poetry, more than 100 short stories
(collected in multiple volumes), seven collections of essays, 13 books for children and five volumes of translation,
including the Tao Te Ching of Lao Tzu and selected poems by the Chilean Nobel Prize winner Gabriela Mistral.
She also wrote a guide for writers.

The writer’s “pleasant duty,” she said, is to ply the reader’s imagination with “the best and purest nourishment that it can absorb.”

The Fantastic Ursula K. Le Guin | October 26, 2016 issue - The New Yorker

    January 3, 2018

News Flash: Lightning Deaths Hit a Record Low in 2017 | LiveScience

Thank you, Mr. President.

    January 2, 2018

    Let's change the subject, what do you say? I've been watching old movies lately. It's winter in the Northwest, what do you do? If you watch the same movie enough times, you see all the flaws, the implausibilities--even considering the context--and things that happen that make no sense.

    At the end of the Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers we have a scene in the Helms Deep throne room. The Urik-hai are breaking down the door. Including King Theoden, Aragon, Legolas, and Jimli, there are about a dozen men. Are we to assume that all the other soldiers, including the contingent of Elf people, have been wiped out? Does that mean that Rohan's population now consists of these dozen or so men and all the women and children in the cave beyond? Is that it? And then the final insult to sense. They decide to attack the Urik-hai, to go out and meet them. Where did these horses come from?

    In the movie Stargate with Kurt Russel and James Spader we have another incidence of major implausibility. Back on Earth, they used a huge machine to turn the inner ring which, somehow, I've never been able to figure out, locks-in a certain symbol, in sequence, which eventually opens the stargate. Okay, now we're on the other planet near the end of the story. Russel is initiating the bomb with a click of a switch. He looks at Spader, Doctor Jackson, and says, "You have seven minutes."

    That is, to align the gate so as to return to Earth. Well, jeeze, folks. Jackson didn't even bother to look at all the symbols on the tablet they found, so I don't think he has it memorized. He would have to run back to that cave, write them down or memorize them--good luck--then run back and by hand, mind you, align the symbols in the proper order. If they had to use hydrolic machinery back on Earth to accomplish that, how the hell is he suppose to do it by hand? And all this in less than seven minutes!

    In Dante's Peak there is a classic line I can't believe. Okay, the volcano is erupting. Buildings, freeways, electrical poles, everything is crumbling and falling down; the town is quickly disintegrating. Brosnan and Hamilton are in his rig heading uphill to retrieve her children and mother-in-law. The helicopter, the only one, apparently, crashes right past them into a store or something and blows up, starting a fire. He's talking to his boss on the handheld radio, tells where he is, and says, "Send the fire services." Well, gee. The whole town is falling apart and the volcano is about to blow its top, so I'm sure the firemen are sitting in the fire station waiting dutifully for a call. They're not trying to escape with their families like everyone else. The streets are covered with bricks, crashed cars, and poles, yet they are on duty, ready to go to the rescue of some building up on the hill.

    And there are other insanities in other movies I could list. How about just one more? Okay, The Hunt for Red October is a great movie with a terrific cast. But the pivotal moment in the plot centers around Jack Ryan, played by Alec Baldwin, persuading the skipper of the Dallas that Captain Raimios, Sean Connery, wants to defect. How does he convince him? Okay, he guesses that Raimios is going to pull a Crazy Ivan--turn sharply--to starboard. Well, concidentally, he does just that, which is enough for the captain, Scott Glenn. Here's my question: What does this have to do with defecting? I mean, apparently, the captain of the Dallas accepts that because Ryan knew this, it implies with certitude that he must also be right about Raimios's desire to defect. Where's the connection? How could the Crazy Ivan prove that?

    All of Tom Clancy's movies have this sudden leap, this wide canyon he comes to that necessitates jumping over in order to continue with the story. Yet, he is a Best-Selling author.

    It goes on and on. And let's not even get started on Godzilla, Waterworld or Jurassic Park.

    January 1, 2017

    This was written way back in August of 2017, but I only just ran into it. If you haven't read it, I think it's worthwhile:

The President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities Resignation Letter.

    And commentary from the New York Times:

16 Members of White House Arts Committee Resign to Protest Trump | by Robin Pogrebin.

    December 29, 2017

Trump, The Insurgent, Breaks With 70 Years of American Foreign Policy
By Mark Lnader - December 28, 2017 - The New York Times

E.P.A. Officials, Disheartened by Agency’s Direction, Are Leaving in Droves
December 22, 2107 - The New York Times

    December 8, 2017

Voucher Schools Championed By Betsy DeVos Can Teach Whatever They Want. Turns Out They Teach Lies.
These schools teach creationism, racism and sexism. They’re also taking your tax dollars.

    November 17, 2017


I believe that tax cuts to the rich and super rich will be used to build factories where exclusively Americans will produce things for decent, middle class wages that people in China can build for pennies an hour.

I believe the Earth is only 6,000 years old and that all the animals on it are as they have always been. And that God created humankind in his image, which gives us the right to treat animals any way we wish.

I believe the Great Flood of biblical times gouged out the Grand Canyon.

I believe that ALL Americans have the inalienable right to live on the street and to take possession of a shopping cart to store and transport their worldly goods.

I believe that withdrawing and insulating ourselves from the rest of the planet can work to our benefit. Cooperation for the good of the whole has never been a successful strategy. Thinking only of our country first, last, and always will bring security and eventual peace worldwide.

These things I believe in and much more. Some day, I'll share them with you.

    November 16, 2017

    Let's get away from politics, attempts at analysis, and the state of our country for a moment and check this out.

    For cat lovers and caretakers:
    I've lived with cats for a very long time, but still do not know them as well as I should. Recently I came across a website containig an article of significant information regarding the feeding of cats. It's entitled Feeding Your Cat: Knowing the Basics of Feline Nutrition by Lisa A. Pierson, DVM. It states in the final summation: "This paper has outlined what constitutes optimal nutrition for an obligate carnivore in a home environment as well as discussed some diseases that a poor diet can cause."

    It's a long read; however, there is a short version available.

    Sorry, I couldn't resist this:

Trump sinks to a New Low -- Even For Him | November 15, 2017 - Daily Kos

Shame On Trump For Leagalizing Trophy Hunting | Sign Petition - Force Change

    November 13, 2017

How America Lost Its Mind
Kurt Anderson | September, 2017 Issue - The Atlantic

    November 4, 2017

What's in it for Johnny Lucnchbucket? | by Dana Milbank
November 3, 2017 - The Washington Post

    November 2, 2017

Trump, Niger and Connecting the Dots | by Thomas L. Friedman
October 31, 2017 - The New York Times

    October 29, 2017

    October 25, 2017

Read Flake's bombshell Senate speech: 'Mr. President, I rise today to say: Enough'
October 24, 2017 - azcentral

    October 16, 2017

Trump administration unveils the 'Fetal 14th Amendment'
October 15, 2017 | Daily Kos

    October 14, 2017

    I was chatting with Donald Trump the other day; I finally got a hold of him. I've been busy here in the Northwest replenishing my pot stockpile in anticipation of the upcoming winter, so I wasn't able to return his calls. We had a good laugh over what he was up to: Threatening North Korea with nuclear war, reneging on the Iran agreement in spite of how the others involved feel about it, pulling out of the Paris Accord so that the U.S. can act unilaterally when it comes to carbon production, spending billions on a meaningless wall across the border with Mexico instead of using it to improve infrastructure and, in the process, employ thousands of people across the country, threatenig to deport immigrants who've been living here since childhood, canceling state insurance subsidies with an executive order that jeopardizes health insurance for millions of needy Americans. He went on and on.

    We also chuckled over how well his distractions were working. Reshoring his base when it seemed to be lagging by waging war with the NFL over the flag, always a gut-level rallying cry; intimating racist leanings; attempting to revitalize the coal industry; rolling back environmental protection laws by canceling clean air and water restrictions; appealing to evangelicals and anti-abortion supporters on moralistic grounds by defunding Planned Parenthood and other similar organizations; opening up federal wilderness areas to mining and logging, and criticizing anyone who criticizes him, which invariably ends up preoccupying The New York Times and other national news outlets, while he works to push through tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations.

    I reminded him that despite the overwheling devastation in Houston thanks to hurricane Harvey, no international aid groups had been asked to help. No Doctors without Borders or United Nations troops with blue helmets handing out care packages to the desperate from the back of trucks, none of the dozens of NGOs that descend on a country after experiencing a natural disaster had been needed. We are used to taking care of our own, it's part of our pride as Americans. It's what bonds us and gives us strength as a nation. But he laughed at my attempt. He explained, as though to a child, that a fragmented populace was easier to control. And once that's cemented and the instability it causes implemented to the degree of becoming commonplace, his programs and agenda, such as they are, will be more easily put into play.

    He accused me of being naive, in fact. Confusion, anxiety, and stress create a state of insecurity, a society at odds with itself. When that becomes endemic and permeates every aspect of society, then America will again realize its Greatness, with him at the helm. I almost saw a glimmer of his rationality, of how much sense it makes, but then it faded into all the other mish-mosh. I was confused.

    Sounding a bit displeased that I hadn't exclaimed how brilliant he was, he said he heard the bell ring and had to go. And without so much as a good-bye, hung up.

    Later, after sampling my stash, a question unbidden popped into my head out of the mist, as it were: Can we survive a President who refuses, or is unable, to think through to the consequences of his actions? Not a visionary by any means, he nonetheless has this vision of a house divided, with him as the disciplinarian father. A father who knows what's best and how to accomplish it, if we just let him do whatever he wants.

    October 1, 2017

James Baldwin on the Artist’s Struggle for Integrity and How It Illuminates the Universal Experience of What It Means to Be Human

    September 20, 2017

Leader of the Free World
No Experience Necessary

    September 16, 2017

New survey shows a disturbing trend: Most Americans have no clue what is in the Constitution
September 15, 2017 - Daily Kos

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION | LII | Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School

    September 14, 2017

Animal Rescue Compilation | VIDEOS - YouTube

People saving pets From the Floods in Houston | VIDEO - YouTube

    September 10, 2017

    Open Letter:

      Estimates vary, but it's probably not outrageous to state that around 100 million animals per year are used in experiments worldwide. That number doesn't include invertebates, rats, mice, birds, fish, and frogs. It's conducted inside universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, farms, defense establishments, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Animal shelters and pounds are required by law to hold dogs and cats for five days before selling them to a dealer. That's all, five days. Four states in the U.S. — Minnesota, Utah, Oklahoma, and Iowa — require their shelters to provide animals to research facilities. Fourteen states explicitly prohibit the practice, while the remainder either allow it or have no relevant legislation. These animals are classified as "random source." Dealers obtain them any way they can, apparently, oftentimes under fraudulent circumstances, not only from shelters, but also from want ads and grabbed off the street. Stolen pets have been found in various university medical labs.

      Besides subjecting chimpanzees to nerve-gas and blowing-up live pigs from the inside-out, just to see what happens to the internal organs, the military practices what they call "trauma training" for medics and special soldiers. This entails procedures like cutting off the legs of awake and non-anesthetized animals in order to toughen service personnel for possible combat.

      I could go on, it's endless. After recently watching a documentary on chimpanzee experimentation, I did some research. Reading about how these animals are treated and looking at pictures, I felt like I was living in medieval times. Considering the degree to which this testing is defended, not only by the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries, but also by the Department of Agriculture and the National Institutes of Health, I had to ask myself why I found it so objectionable. Don't I want drug companies to develop cures for diseases? Do I mind if they induce painful, debilitating illnesses in dogs in order to test experimental drugs, which may themselves cause serious illness? After they use them, they're euthanized anyway, so, what's the difference? Don't I want eyeliner and eyelash stuff tested for irritation by first placing it into the eyes of rabbits and cats? I've seen enough women applying eyelash stuff while driving their cars so many times that I can see where that could be a problem.

      There must be other ways to do this kind of research and experimentation. It's way too ghoulish and twisted. Only sociopaths could do that kind of work, day in, day out. If you weren't to begin with, it could certainly push you in that direction.

      I'm a retired commercial fisherman with zero political clout or powerful connections. So, there's nothing I can do about it. My hope is that someone reads this who can and is outraged enough to want to. If you're interested in finding out more, I have a section on my website at: However, if you're the squeamish type, please don't bother.

      Adrian Dorn

    September 8, 2017

      A bowl of water used by my cat, Mariah, as a bee watering hole, and, as it turns out, a treefrog pool on a hot day. Click picture for larger version.

    September 5, 2017

    Like probably most everyone else in the country, I've been watching and reading about the events in Houston and surrounding area. Besides the official rescuers--the National Guard, all police organizations, the Coast Guard--ordinary people, not only from Texas but from other states too, representing all walks of life, all races, colors, belief systems, values and mores, joining together, organizing, taking direction, rescuing strangers, risking their lives, not only after the brunt of the storm passed but also while it was at its peak, have vividly and heroically demonstrated to the world the true character of America.

    Those amazing people have shown once again that they, and by extension--I believe--the majority of Americans, are better than most of the top-rank of government, squabblers who promote divisiveness and refuse to cooperate for the common good. What a country we would have--a nation to be proud of--if only those leaders were made of the same stuff as the rescuers at Houston.

People saving pets From the Floods in Houston | VIDEO - YouTube
RAW VIDEO Dramatic Water Rescue in Harvey floodwaters in Houston

    September 3, 2017

No, Cutting the Corporate Tax Rate Won't "Create Jobs" | September 3, 2017 - Daily Kos

    August 26, 2017

    I'm writing this knowing that nothing can be done about it, but I have to get it off my chest. In today's Seattle Times there's a story about "Second wolf pack targeted for killing after more cattle deaths." By what freakin' right does the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife have to kill them off? Justin Hendrick, an owner of the DiamondMRanch, and other cattle owners have lost cattle to the wolves. The DiamondMRanch is one of the largest cattle operations in the state; surely, they can afford to invest some of their income to provide another means to protect their livestock without killing off whole packs of wolves.

    But here's the thing that really bothers me. Those wolves in the state I've called home for over forty years belong to all of us. They live in the wilderness, our wilderness--public land. The Hendricks lease grazing land in the Colville National Forest. Well Christ almighty, how are they allowed to do that? If you put cattle in the middle of a wilderness area--mountainous, forested landscapes--without suitable protection where wolves live, of course they might be considered easy targets; in fact, however, that's not the case. As the story states, "Only six cattle were killed by wolves in Washington last year, making it a rare cause of death on the range."

    Two other packs have been killed off for these people: the Wedge Pack in 2012 and the Profanity Pack last summer. Moreover, the Department of Fish and Wildlife doesn't work for the Hendrick family. They're not Mr. Hendrick's own personal extermination squad. And who's going to pay for the killing operation? We, the taxpayers. If ranchers are going to graze livestock on public lands, then it's their responsibility to protect them, not we Washingtonians through Fish and Wildlife. Their job isn't to help the Hendricks economicaly by killing off packs of wolves who happen to live smack dab in the middle of the same place where they have arrogantly chosen to graze their cows. At the very least, if wolves whose protections fall under the purview and custodianship of the people of this state are seen as a threat to some rancher's cattle, we should have a referendum or some such thing to vote on whether Mr. Hendrick's livelihood warrants the mass killing of entire packs of wolves. In my eyes, he doesn't have that right and neither do the Fish and Wildlife people. For one man, for the sake of his bottomline, to decide the fate of the wolves who call Washington's wilderness home is totally wrong. His lease agreement and those of others who graze livestock on public lands should be cancelled to protect the habitat of the wolves, not the other way around.

    Mentioned in the story was the organization Predator Defense.

    August 15, 2017

"It is clear to me now that the Republic no longer functions.
I pray you will bring sanity and compassion back to the Senate."

Queen Amidala --Star Wars: Episode I

    August 9, 2017
Pangolins: One of the world’s least known and most hunted animals
Mark Todd discusses why pangolins are now believed to be the most trafficked mammal in the world…

    August 7, 2017
the fog horn off North Beach has learned to sing. it has become conscious of itself and discovered it has a voice. it starts off flat and low, but not too low, somewhere in the middle. be aware of my presence, it calls. i have a job. i have meaning. then flirts upward a whole note, quickly moving to a haunting, cloying sense of loss, alone in its loneliness.

    July 27, 2017

Conservation International Blog

Field notes from the lost city | July 7, 2017

Decoding wildlife crime: 3 stories you need to read | by Sophie Bertazo - July 11, 2017
5 things you didn't know about wildlife trafficking | by Bruno Vander Veldi - July 23, 2017

Anti-poaching drive brings Siberia's tigers back from the brink | The Guardian

    July 25, 2017

    Linear-time existence is built up on a continuum of discontinuous, nonlinear existences. Linear time has been surgically abstracted from nonlinear time, and by so doing, determinism has been distilled out from its fusion with unpredictability.

    We perceive order thereby we create linearity by defining, in the instantaneous act of perception, the manner in which we understand cause and effect. It is a wholly syntropic experience. The difficulty arises, more often than not, when we try to impose order from without according to a map or paradigm we carry in our heads. In the process of overlaying such static, nonlinearly empty, projections onto a dynamic interrelating "environment" from which we abstract ourselves, we shove the nonlinear wildness, and simultaneously our contact with the Self, under the carpet or cloak of a deterministic universe. We construct a prison for the Self; and try to consign Mother Nature to the role of Thing.

    In a dynamic situation, the final "behaviour" of the system, its shape as an end result of infinite, random combinations, may be all that is ascertainable.

    The nobility and courage of the lion stand in stark contrast to the base urges and stunted emotional development of the arrogant humans who hunt them for sport. Throwbacks. Raising lions and other animals on farms [canned] to be easily killed by trophy hunting narcissists shows how much contempt they have for the animal they kill. How can they brag about killing something so much more worthy than they? Do they hope to steal their spirits and thereby acquire what they don't possess themselves? Do they, these trophy heroes, sneak up on them while they sleep or wait until they're eating, then shoot them in mid-chew? Do they hunt from the safety of a helicopter or truck? They are cowards seeking validation by killing their betters.

    Trophy hunting, killing endangered animals for sport and competition with other like-minded people--throwbacks to a former age--is glamorized and romanticised in spite of the animals' severely diminished numbers. Ego gratification is not a sufficient reason to kill anything. International organizations exist that can be accessed through the internet where people brag about their kills. And because it costs a significant amount of money for licenses, the club is composed of folks who don't need to kill for food, people who are out of touch with their connection to the Earth and its animals and so must validate themselves by killing creatures who are no threat to them. They travel vast distances, hire professional hunters to take them on safari or go to farms where animals are bred and kept in order to assure the client kills something, an adventure in the wild. A search on Google for trophy hunting sites will return thousands offering hunting packages to those who can afford it.

    For twenty years I worked as a hard-core commercial fisherman on Alaska waters, so I'm not sqeamish about killing for food. But, I, personally, cannot even begin to imagine killing an elephant for fun or sport, or a giraffe, buffalo, leopard, or any of the rare and beautiful animals on the list of offerings. They hunt leopards with dogs, wear them down, corner them, and then shoot them, a trapped and frightened wildcat. After which, they brag about it, what he-men they are. Mind-numbing assholes absorbed in their own reality, incapable of realizing what they're actually doing. Their real motives may not even break through to consciousness, but when asked, they rationalize with double speak that they're helping to conserve whatever species they kill. Those not above the politically-correct need to justify their actions; they may not believe it themselves or be aware of the larger picture that supposedly substantiates it, the argument backed by science, the pseudo-science of managing nature, but they read it in the brochure and that's good enough for them.

    [Conservation? -- In Okavango Delta: Ostrich numbers declined by 95 percent, while 90 percent of wildebeest were also wiped out, along with 84 percent of antelope tsessebe, 81 percent of warthogs and kudus, and nearly two-thirds of giraffes.]

    It's pitiful and painful to me, and all I can do about the slaughter of these innocents is to try to help bring awareness to their desperate plight. They're being driven to extinction for the thrill of it all, and the only difference between poaching and trophy hunting is the legality of it, paying the government, the end is the same. Frankly, I have more respect for poachers, at least they're straightforward about their motivation.

    How can anyone watch a giraffe or an elephant or a lion peacefully walking along on a wide plain or savanna, observe the sinewy grace of their movements and observe the gentle care they show their offspring, and take pleasure in killing them for no better reason than ego gratification?

    We live in a world where people still hunt animals for sport as trophies to brag about, not only in Africa and Asia, but here in the states too. For example, cougar hunting is legal in Washington, and in most other states people are allowed to hunt certain animals that don't end up on the dinner table, like wolves in Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, North Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, and Idaho. Wolves are hunted to the brink of extinction and the rationale is to say it's to protect livestock and dogs, but in actuality it's to protect the bottomline of hunting lodges and the associated economy.

    It's stupid and myopic, as are most endeavors where humans try to manage wildlife. In the case of the killing of wolves, without a sufficient number of predators, the populations of game--deer, moose, elk--increase disproportionately, their food sources become scarce, with the end result being population collapse through starvation. Moreover, with no fear of predation, they linger by streams, browse eating the vegetation that keeps the banks in place. When the rains come, mud flows into the streams covering stones where fish lay their eggs. A high percentage of egg loss means a high percentage of fish NOT returning to their stream, which means a loss of food source for animals that eat fish and a loss of nutrients for the environment in general. And so forth, with the result being that the web decoheres, falls apart, connections become tenuous and finally dissolve, the ecosystem passes a critical minimum sustainablity, fragments, grows unstable and eventually declines towards total collapse for both flora and fauna.

    Nature has been busy regulating the Biosphere long before Man came on the scene, and yet we seem to think we can do a better job. The ecosystem is fundamental, no part of it can be regulated without affecting the whole, usually leading to disaster in unpredictable ways. Once the complex set of interdependnet interactions has been altered passed some critical point, a new configuration emerges, the kaleidoscope twists. That's common sense.

    It's the mind-set that needs changing, hopeless as that may be.

      Donald Trump's Sons

Trophy Hunting | Global Digest

    Okay. Let me tell you the real deal. You're a trophy hunter. I don't mean someone who's hunting for food for himself and his family, I mean someone who's doing it for pleasure, for ego-gratification. You're out there in the wild, which includes what they call "canned" hunting on reserves where animals are trapped inside fences for the sake of those with the big bucks who want to kill something. The target animal is either standing around or laying down or possibly even asleep. With your experienced hunter's eyes, you spot him. Maybe he's grazing or just taking in his surroundings. He's not charging or running away. Perhaps he's even looking at you, wondering what the hell you're doing or even what the hell you are if he's not familiar with humans. You take your high-powered rifle with scope and aim. He stands there. Maybe it's an elephant chomping on leaves or long grass. You shoot, he falls, dead. Afterwards you brag about the hunt, the kill, how exhilahrating it all was. A big tusker. Well, Jesus, where's the glory in that? Where's the challenge? Where's the fun come in? What the hell really happened?

    Do you imagine you've validated your manhood, punched your Cro Magnon card, by shooting an animal with a high-powered rifle while hiding behind a clump of downed trees or bushes? Do you imagine you're on some kind of religious quest, a spiritual undertaking to find your earthly, authentic soul, doing your part to testify to Mankind's dominance over the lesser animals, joining the venerable society of tribal hunters? Or do you just like to kill things, especially animals that can kill you, let them know who's the top dog? Who's superior now, eh?

    Only a coward would kill an animal standing around minding its own business, not threatening anyone. You see, these people, these trophy hunters are sick individuals, emotionally stunted, without conscience or caring. There's no big deal to killing something that's simply minding its own business, not interested in you, or even lying down asleep. That's trophy hunting. They brag about it. There's websites where they list their "kills." These people are assholes and cowards. It's all crap!

    Lions and tigers are cats, they spend 16 hours a day sleeping and resting. Just sneak up on one and from a safe distance, shoot while he/she's napping. What courage, what bravery, what narcissistic bullshit!

    Animals are not trophies.

    July 21, 2017

A new interview reveals Trump’s ignorance to be surprisingly wide-ranging

THE DIRTY DOZEN: 12 Worst CEOs for Animals in Laboratories

    July 7, 2017

Lab Research Dogs See Sun and Earth for the First Time | VIDEO - YouTube

    July 4, 2017

Why Trump's brand of stupidity is so dangerous | Paul Waldman - The Week

    July 2, 2017

Why China's Yulin Dog Meat Festival Won't Be Cancelled This Year After All | June 15, Forbes

Why China’s Yulin dog meat festival is a wake-up call to the world | Animals Australia

Dog Meat Still on Sale at Controversial Festival | National Geographic

    June 30, 2017

    The most despicable act of cruelty forced upon animals, to my mind, is bear bile farming in Asia. So seldom is there any good news coming from that front. Animals Asia is an organization that is activley working hard to end such torture. Here's something: Nine Moon Bears Rescued from Farm in Vietnam

    June 26, 2017


GOP Senate Bill Would Cut Health Care Coverage By 22 Million | June 26, 2017 | NPR

    June 22, 2017

Senate Republicans Reveal Long-Awaited Affordable Care Act Repeal Bill | NPR

"Larry Levitt, a health policy expert at the Kaiser Family Foundation, summed up his thoughts on the bill on Twitter on Thursday:
"In broad strokes, the Senate bill is just like the House: Big tax cuts, big cut in federal heath spending, big increase in the uninsured."

    June 14, 2017

Laos: The Tiger Meat Farms Must Go - Sign Petition

"In one specific destination, the Kings Romans
- an entertainment complex containing a hotel, casino, “zoo” and restaurants,
you can purchase anything from bear paw, pangolin and sauteed tiger meat.
And the nearby jewelry shops sell endangered animal parts like tiger teeth and rhino horns."

    June 11, 2017

This life has been modified from its original version.
It's been formatted to fit this time and place.

    June 2, 2017

Trump Will Withdraw U.S. From Paris Climate Agreement | June 1, 2017 - The New York Times

World reacts to Trump's Paris climate accord withdrawl | June 2, 2017 - AlJazeera
Paris climate agreement: What you need to know

Trump's Speech on Paris Climate Withdrawl, Annotated | June 1, 2017 - NPR

    May 31, 2017

Denounce Politically Motivated Prairie Dog Hunt with Donald Trump Jr.
"As good Montanans, we want to show good hospitality to people,” Gianforte said.
“What can be more fun than to spend an afternoon shooting the little rodents?" -- Greg Gianforte, Republican Scumbag

    May 27, 2017

A Dark Cloud With A Silver Lining
The death of an elephant by trophy hunters, or by anyone, for that matter, is never something to be treated lightly. However, this time there was justice:

Shot Elephant Falls on Trophy Hunter, Killing Him | May 22, 2017 - PETA

    May 25, 2017

Stop Sucking Blood From Pregnant Horses to Induce Fertility in Pigs | Force Change Petition

    "In other words, big factory farms have figured out they can suck the blood of pregnant horses, and inject an extract of that blood into pigs so they can be forced to constantly give birth.

    "If you think it can’t possibly get worse, then you might want to think again:

    "The mares are regularly being given abortions without painkillers, so they can keep getting pregnant, and thus constantly producing the hormone."

    May 24, 2017

GOP Health Plan Would Leave 23 Million More Uninsured, Budget Office Says |

Trump Takes a Big Bite out of his Voters' Food Stamps | Mother Jones
Seven of the 10 states that most rely on SNAP voted for Trump

President Donald Trump unveiled his 2018 budget today, with more than $1 trillion in cuts over the next 10 years
to government programs such as Medicaid, farm subsidies, affordable housing, and other anti-poverty programs.

    May 23, 2017

Trump budget seeks huge cuts to science and medical research, disease prevention
Planned Parenthood would be barred from receiving any HHS funding, according to a fact sheet accompanying the budget release
— a prohibition that would apply not just to Medicaid but to all programs. The fact sheet notes that this move
“follows through on a campaign promise” to block federal dollars from
“certain entities that provide abortions, including Planned Parenthood.”

Trump proposes dramatic changes to federal government, slashing safety net programs that affect up to a fifth of Americans
May 23, 2017 - The Washington Post

    May 8, 2017

Here's What's in the House-Approved Health Care Bill | May 4, 2017 - NPR

    "The House of Representatives voted last week to eliminate critical healthcare coverage and protections for millions of Americans. By a margin of only four votes, the House just took health insurance away from 24 million Americans, raised everyone's insurance costs by an average of $1,500, cut $880 billion from critical Medicaid services, and made it next-to-impossible for individuals with pre-existing conditions to afford the protections they need -- all while delivering a $600 billion tax break to wealthy individuals and corporations."

    May 7, 2017

Five Minute Video: Cat Saves Boy From Dog Attack

Today Show - May 15, 2014

Scott Pruit hails era of environmental deregulation in speech at coal mine | April 13, 2017 | The Guardian

'Like a slow death': families fear pesiticde poisoning after Trump reverses ban | April 17, 2017 | The Guardian

    April 10, 2017

Syria chemical attack: Doctors, civilians recall children suffocating, dying on streets, sarin gas suspected | April 5, 2017 - Fox News
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack | USAToday

    I wonder how President Trump feels now about granting asylum to Syrian children? To Syrian refuges in general? I commend his decision to attack the source of the raid, but we could go further: Find out where Assad is at any likely moment and blow it to smitherenes.

    April 6, 2017

End The War On Wildlife

    Excerpt from email I received:

    "Richard Nixon is looking pretty good right now. He created the Environmental Protection Agency. He signed the Endangered Species Act. He also signed an Executive Order banning poisons that kill native carnivores on public lands in 1972. That executive order is, sadly, no longer in effect.

    "In the past few weeks alone, three tragedies involving use of indiscriminate poisons on our public lands should give pause to every American. A few weeks ago, a young boy was harmed and the family dog killed by a cyanide bomb placed on public land by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s animal damage control agency. Five days earlier, two families recreating on public lands in Wyoming watched two of their family dogs die after the animals detonated cyanide devices. And two weeks before those incidents, a wolf was killed in Oregon by the same type of device.

    "These three recent incidents are exactly why extremely dangerous M-44 cyanide bombs, and other indiscriminate tools like traps and poisons that are deployed to kill wildlife, often targeting majestic native carnivores like wolves and coyotes, should not be placed on our public lands.

    "It would be a mistake to call these tragedies accidents. It’s not an accident if federal employees are knowingly placing deadly devices where children and companion animals play; that’s extreme and inexcusable negligence.

    "This should be, and I believe is, a bipartisan issue. While liberals and conservatives may disagree about wolves, can’t we all agree on public safety issues that affect our children and family companion animals? Is it going to take the death of a child before the public takes action to prevent the regular and reckless damage caused by these practices? Sadly, this very well could happen.

    "The essential questions are these: how precise are these “cyanide bombs” and how effective are they at accomplishing their stated goals? Consider this—more than 50,000 non-target animals have been killed in this or similar ways. If the USDA has failed 50,000 times regarding animals, how long before an unsuspecting child is the victim?

    "But we can make it stop.

    "WildEarth Guardians is intensifying our End the War on Wildlife campaign to mobilize more popular support to secure local, state and federal action to end the barbaric, indiscriminate killing. Just last week Congressman Peter DeFazio introduced a bill in Congress to ban predator poisons on our public lands.

    "And earlier this week we filed a lawsuit to force Wildlife Services to stop using cyanide bombs. Last week we filed a petition with the USDA seeking to prohibit their use in Idaho. I strongly believe that the American people firmly support an end to cruelty against our majestic wildlife, and I am absolutely convinced that every American is opposed to actions that threaten their children."

    March 25, 2017

Republicans Admit Defeat On Health Care Bill: 'Obamacare Is The Law Of The Land' | NPR

    March 16, 2017

    Let's remember, folks, that Donald Trump is, at heart, a real estate developer. He sees his entire kingdom as open and needful of development. This is his main goal, and distractions such as Muslims invading our country and Obama tapping his phone, and whatever else he can tweet out to the world, will serve him as he sets about on his true interests of a more personal sort.

    Our infrastructure is in a state of near collapse. If he were to set about on that major project, reminiscent of the Public Works Administration (PWA), part of the New Deal of 1933, a large-scale public works construction agency in the United States headed by Secretary of the Interior Harold L. Ickes, I would actually feel he might do some good accidentally.

A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again |

    Manufacturing's not coming back, people need employment, forget all these pathetic, lame distractions and sign some executive orders to set about bringing the country to renewed pride in itself that way, not by building real and imaginary walls around us to protect us from the boogeymen. I don't want Trump to be my dad, protecting me from who knows what. But building roads and bridges, airports and power grids, hospitals and schools is not very dramatic or glamorous, it doesn't satisfy his ego as much as being the protector, the tough guy willing to glare at the rest of the world to let them know not to mess with us. Well, I think they already know that. He wants to be seen as the white knight coming to rescue us from the dangers of living in the world as it is. All his ranting, bravado, and tough-guy talk and attitude just encourages those sitting on the fence to challenge him.

    Like I said before, he's a punk and a bully, and in the neighborhood I grew up in, a guy like him sooner or later met with trouble. And that means, of course, us too.

    February 25, 2017

    Melodramatic and overstated this might be, but nonetheless, our country is in danger of losing its fundamental identity. An identity idealized at its birth and worked towards ever since, overcoming odds in its effort to actualize itself as though it had a will of its own. But the land of the free and the home of the brave is becoming the land of the xenophobic and the home of the cynical, suspicious, and fearful. How do we want other countries to see us? We have always been a beacon of freedom in the world. A safe place for those seeking to escape tyranny, persecution, and desperate, war-torn conditions. An asylum, a sanctuary, a safe haven in the storm. Children terrified and confused, living abnormal, dijointed lives, often without parents or loved ones nearby. We deny them refuge?

Toxic stress in war zones is harming development of millions of young children | Feb. 17, 2017 - Theirworld
Syrian Children Under Siege | UNICEF

    When compassion and empathy go out of the equation, so do integrity and tolerance. By stripping our conscience of these essential ingredients, we don't regain some illusory state of greatness; we lose all hope of achieving it in truth. We become a house divided amongst itself, ignoring our responsibilities as Americans. Make America Great Again should point to that ideal the founding fathers created out of their own vivid experiences of a life without freedom--a refuge for those in need. Are we going back to times when government promoted open warfare against the indigenous population, genocide and land-grabbing sanctioned as accepted norms? Or how about when Americans of Japanese descent were interned in make-shift detention camps on the West coast for the duration of World War II? Or the times of slavery of people taken from their homelands and forced to work in fields of cotton? What period of greatness is Trump referring to?

Indian-Killer Andrew Jackson Deserves Top Spot on List of Worst U.S. Presidents | Indian Country Media Network
Millard Fillmore: The Racist Who Didn’t Like Anyone | Indian Country Media Network
11 Most Racist US Presidents | The Huffington Post

    The original ideal is one that is yet unfolding, albeit in fits and starts, into the future, not one that seeks to refabricate a bygone era in all its infinite details. An impossibility even if all the components were still available. For instance, where are the unions of the former Midwest manufacturing world? Gone. Without them, what you would have is an American version of a sweatshop (minimum wage) with production ramped up to compare with that of China. It's all an illusion and the wrong direction.

    The people around the country who support Trump's actions and agenda are collaborating in a lie. And in the end, it will all come back to bite them, and unfortunately, the rest of us as well, on the ass.

    February 23, 2017

The United States of America

Closed for Remodeling


"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

    February 10, 2017

    President Trump sees Muslim immigrants and citizens of this country as a threat to national security. But how about ignorance of treaties concerning nuclear weapons? That doesn't seem to be as important. He has access to the buttons to push and nobody can stop him. Shouldn't that be something he needs to learn?

Trump's Doubts and Ignorance on Nuclear Treaty Worry Experts
On a call with the Russian president, Trump reportedly had to ask aides what the New START treaty was. | Mother Jones

    February 9, 2017

Why Does Donald Trump Lash Out at Everybody, Even Judges?
February 9, 2017 - John Cassidy - The New Yorker

The Mind of Donald Trump | by Dan P. McAdams - The Atlantic

Donald Trump Just Lost, Bigly | February 9, 2017 - The Washington Post

Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee Calls President’s Attacks On Judge ‘Demoralizing’
February 8, 2017 - The Huffington Post

    February 7, 2017

Like Many Americans, A Judge On The Court Weighing Trump’s Refugee Ban Was A Refugee
February 6, 2017 - The Huffington Post
Judge Alex Kozinski’s family fled communism when he was a child.

    February 4, 2017

    As the sun sets here in the Northwest (we assume that because it gets darker), chaos spreads across this great land of ours and world leaders scratch their heads in consternation and wonder as to how we could have elected such a disagreeable and contentious nutcase to the office of the Presidency. In an attempt to assess the pulse of the people, our team dispatched interviewers to different parts of the country. Small town USA has always been a straightforward source of homespun truth and sincere appraisal; you won't find many who complicate their opinions and criticisms with purely rational thought. Critical thinking and analytical reasoning can compromise judgementally motivated decision making. Things aren't always what they appear to be; in fact, they hardly ever are. And thinking things through, considering the practical realities--the nuts and bolts--can undermine hope and dreams and the confidence that everything will work out just fine, even if that confidence flies in the face of reason.

    The team threw darts at a map and left for their lot in life immediately. Urgency spurred them on.

    In Hillberg, South Carolina, it seems most folks were behind the president 100%. In a small diner on the south end of town, our correspondent, Anne Marie, talked to a man stuffing himself with opossum stew and dingleberry pie. In between mouthfuls, Joe Bob (that's the only name he would give, convinced as he was that the CIA was monitoring him from space), said, "If'n the president wants to go to war with the rest of the world, I reckon it's all right with me. After all, he wouldn't be where he is if he didn't know what he was doin'."

    Later in the cool evening, Anne Marie entered the General Store. A few men sat around the wood stove chit-chatting about the state of the world. She introduced herself and explained her assignment. At first they were distrustful, she is the media. But when she told them she grew up in Florida and had once shot a cow in the head just for the hell of it, they warmed up. Billy Jim (no last name, same reason) appeared to be the spokeman for the group. When asked what he thought about Trump's first two weeks in office, he said, "When ya' jump behind the wheel of a moving tractor, first thing ya' do is grab the wheel and yank it hard one way or tother just to get its attention." The others laughed in agreement, nodding their heads. It's how things are done, common sense. Take the world, grab the wheel and jerk it around, what the hell. Wake everybody up. Get their attention.

    Anne Marie finished the night at one of the two bars in town. It was half-full. She didn't ask anybody anything, she just needed a drink, or two.

    January 31, 2017


    "In the first seven days after he took the Oath of Office, Donald Trump signed a variety of truly despicable and irresponsible executive orders and directives that:

    1. Authorize construction of a border wall (which we now know will be paid for with our tax dollars)
    2. Strip federal funding away from international organizations that even mention abortion
    3. Begin the GOP's efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act -- a move that will take health coverage away from 30 million people
    4. Restart construction of the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines
    5. Place harsh restrictions on immigration, including banning refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria, accelerating deportations, and threatening sanctuary cities
    6. Prevent government agencies from sharing updates with the press or the public on their social media accounts and websites
    7. Order a ban on Muslims from seven countries from entering the United States that goes against our values and makes our country less safe."

Acting Attorney General Says Justice Department Won’t Defend Trump’s Ban On Refugees, Travelers | The Huffington Post

Trump Fires Acting Attorney General of the United States | The Huffington Post

The Inevitability of Impeachment | The Huffington Post

    January 29, 2017

Federal Judge Stays Deportations, Blocking Part Of Trump's Immigration Order | January 28, 2017 | NPR

    January 26, 2017

    As the new administration's policy of mandated ignorance and suppression of scientific inquiry spreads across the land, we the people have only ourselves to blame. The scientific evidence supporting climate change is being thrown out as bunk and the researchers involved are being threatened with career-ending roadblocks if they publish their findings through any means. Climate change is a fact much like gravity, its reality can't be denied. The point of the argument against it is intended to repudiate human responsibility. However, we're not able to do that. Fossil fuel burning and the introduction of methane and other hydrocarbons into the atmosphere and the oceans along with clear-cutting the carbon-eating forests for Palm Oil plantations and other short-lived agricultural needs have to have a deleterous effect. Even if we had no hand in it, were completely exonerated, put our head firmly into the sand, it's still happening and to ignore its exacerbation by our increasing production of heat-absorbing chemicals is to quicken inevitable disaster.

    I suppose we can next expect a clampdown on the teaching of evolution in public schools and state universities in favor of Intelligent Design. Yes, Mabel, the earth is only 6,000 years old, species don't transform into others--that would be silly--and the Great Flood of biblical times gouged out the Grand Canyon.

    Science is nothing more than a point of view and rational thinking a hindrance to economic development.

    And yes to you too, Billy Bob. Multinational corporations will build new factories here in America and cancel all those sweet cheap-labor sweatshop contracts they've had going since the 80s in China, the Phillipines, and Southeast Asia. No problem, sure thing. Patriotism, even if it means paying a hundred times more in wages to produce the same thing, is far more important than their bottomline. It might take some time, perhaps four years, but after we gut the EPA and put a lid on the Department of Energy and the USDA, they'll find it easier to make a profit and thus encourage homegrown manufacturing. Those other countries don't have problems with environmental regulations, protecting and preserving wildlands and parks and the animals that live in them. Clean water, clean air; God almighty, how clean do you want it? That's what filtering plants are for. That's the problem. We need to get rid of all those encumbrances in order to create a level playing field.

    The Dark Ages are upon us. McCarthyism of the fifties is going to look like an Easter Egg hunt compared to what's coming. And the passive-aggressive attitude--Not My President--is simply not going to cut it. Trump doesn't care if groups marginialize themselves, just as long as they stay out of his way.

    January 25, 2017

Trump Administration Restricts News from Federal Scientists at USDA, EPA
January 24, 2017 - Scientific American
Federal agencies ordered to restrict their communications | January 24 - The Washington Post
Information lockdown hits Trump's federal agencies | January 24 - Politico

Trump EPA Pick Expresses Doubts about Climate Change, Defends Oil Industry Funding
January 18, 2017 - Scientific American

Energy Department Refuses Trump's Request for Names on Climate Change
"The memo sought a list of all department employees or contractors who have attended any meetings on the social cost of carbon,
a measurement that federal agencies use to weigh the costs and benefits of new energy and environment regulations.
It also asked for all publications written by employees at the department's 17 national laboratories for the past three years."

NASA, NOAA Data Show 2016 Warmest Year on Record Globally | NASA

    January 23, 2017

Donald Trump Just Replaced the White House Climate Website With…This
January 20, 2017 - Mother Jones

The Mind of Donald Trump by Dan P. McAdams | The Atlantic

    January 1, 2017

    Northwest Weather Report:
    It snowed through the night, most of it anyway, on top of a half-hour hail storm. So I decided I wasn't going anywhere. We live in the woods five miles from town, so when you're snowed-in it's not like you can get out there and hoof it through the crusty snow with the air around you wanting to turn into ice; at least, I'm not interested in trying. No reason to. There's no place I need to be, no emergencies, no appointments, no responsibilities except to my cat, Mariah. I tracked her footprints in the hard snow this morning. She was all over the place. Long hair and surprisingly tough. She's a Northwest cat.

    Being snowed-in with nothing pressing is an excuse to sever all ties with humanity. Perhaps that's a bit too strong. You're on your own and can indulge that aloneness, even if you're with others in the same situation.

    I remember the transformation that would occur when we'd untie the lines at the dock and head out for a three-day run from Kodiak to Akutan in the Aleutians, or actually, to anywhere. It was the untying and leaving that was significant. After a short period, which gets shorter with experience, everything that's happening in your world on land with society, all the problems and relationships and responsibilities, everything that has to do with that self, is suspended, completely. Attention is paid to the moments at hand, the present, the here-and-now. Everything else might as well be on Mars.

    Being snowed-in allows you, or forces you, to expand to the outer edges of your surroundings, the limit of your self-proclaimed enclosure. Your mind goes with it. The here-and-now becomes more important by necessity, by default. Details fill in, are seen and not glossed over. Time slows down to a crawl. You feed crumbs of bread to the many birds, their colorful feathers dancing on the white, frosty snow. A patch of blue opens up in the sky, you stare at it like it was a message from the old ones. You go inside to get warm and make another pot of coffee. You don't have to take care of out there. Only here, in the now time.

    This has been a weather report from outpost Zebra somewhere in the woods of the Great Northwest.

    December 31, 2016

    Would you get on an airliner if you found out that the pilot had no knowledge of how to fly a plane? Would you hire someone to repair your leaky pipes who had no knowledge of plumbing? Well folks, we just hired a person who has no knowledge of how government works, of foreign affairs, or of the miltary as Presdient of the United States of America and Commander-in-Chief of the most complexly organized and most powerful military in the world. Why did we do this?

    When someone has a public record of service in government or the military, think-tankers and the like can possibly speculate on what that person might do in any given situation, domestic or foreign. But that's not the case here. There is nothing to use as a basis from which to deduce possible reactions. I, personally, have never watched any of his campaign speeches; nonetheless, what little I've seen tells me he's run by his ego and seems incapable of rising above it for the good of the country. I don't believe it takes a leap of consciousness to see that. That could be a detriment.

    He's openly unopen. I've known people like that, I met quite a few when I was a commercial fisherman in Alaska. They're invincible and have infinite confidence that they'll be able to tough out whatever nature or anything else might throw at them. Of the many things I learned from that life is that arrogance will get you killed more easily than the worst weather or bad luck. You have to have respect for the sea, not try to or even imagine you can control it by any means. If you're smart, and it doesn't take much more than common sense, you learn early on that you're not in charge, the ocean is. You come to terms with it, learn its every mood and anticipate what may come next. It's a two-way street, in other words. You have to work with your surroundings and give it the respect it deserves.

    In the case of Trump and all the Trumpites, that open-unopenness towards the world and those segments of the population you've chosen to push away can only come back to bite you in the ass. The world needs equilibrium; it's the only state where it can possibly function properly. To act as a pendulum against that inclination, as so many nations do, will only create counter forces, more enemies.

    I have no idea what Trump will do. I can guess, but so what? He's a con man and a good con man knows what role to play for any situation. He feels it out. He becomes what he thinks is needed to be in order to arrive on top. The mark made. But, first, ladies and gentlemen, he must go through an education with an enormous learning curve.

    I don't believe in backing anyone for the sheer sake of backing; I'm not a true believer. But what does need backing is sanity. Perhaps this is the scare we Americans need to take charge of our destinies. I don't know. We'll find out.

    One thing I do know for certain, however, ladies and gentlemen: We'll miss the emotional maturity, rationality, self-possession, dignity, and class that President Barack Obama consistently displayed these past eight years in the face of Republican obstructionism. None of those qualifiers of character can be applied to Trump.

    December 23, 2016

    Donald Trump, president-elect, reminds me of the character Dennis Hopper played in the movie Water World. He had all aboard the Exxon Valdez rowing to the promised land. Only he didn't know where it was or what course to follow. But they rowed feverishly anyway. The faithful. He had a vision.

    September 17, 2016

    Emotional states of mind are places where we go when a certain set of circumstances comes up.

    In the middle of the night under a full moon with life feeling like an empty promise, troubling questions pass through a man's mind. Why didn't Verdell receive an Oscar for the movie As Good As It Gets? Why isn't eggnog available in supermarkets every day of the year like milk? Why is it I can't talk to my neighbor for two minutes without it ending in an argument?

    God has nothing to do with eggnog and, obviously, has no influence over the Oscar committee--The Academy. But you would think he'd have something to do with two people who have the same problem getting along with one another. Yes, we have the same communications interpreter. If in the beginning of a casual chance-meeting talk I use a word that has possible negative connotations, she immediately becomes defensive and tries to correct for it. Cynicism is the other side of reacting defensively. She vollies a misunderstanding, or at least, pretends to misunderstand. What she says makes it sound like she's more sensitive than I am and in fact I am a lout who cares naught for anyone but himself. I shoot back a lame attempt to clarify by stating the opposite, that I too think tree frogs are cute. Of course I do. How could anyone believe otherwise? What kind of a world are we living in? And so it goes, the inexorable spiral downward into the bowels of defense management.

    Politicians of a certain ilk use this trick. The Bait and Snatch. If you don't think this way about that, then you're obviously not very patriotic, or, even a citizen. Do we attend these emotionally entangling speeches and pep rallies to be intentionally drawn in? We want to believe. We block out what we don't want to hear and emphasize what we do. And it may only be one thing, one simply-stated plank in the platform, one intention that we find particularly significant and important. It gets to the heart, or rather, the base of our personal desires, our most inflexible convictions. Conflicting aspirations carve out portions of the population--demographics. In the process, or because of it, groups are formed, factions, organizations, parties. Leaders emerge to identify, galvanize, and solidify those attitudes and feelings, accentuate principles and beliefs. The more ground one can cover--the more convictions that can be appeased--the larger the flock of followers. And then we vote.

    I've decided not to let my neighbor drive me crazy (crazier?) by suckering me into wanting to prove myself to her so she won't think poorly of me. I honestly don't care what she thinks about anything. The sensation of being drawn into something, into a way of thinking, into thoughts that appeal to and support our deepest and most desperate fears with the promise of alleviating if not eliminating those fears is irresistible. Unless ... we understand how the game is played. And let our conscience be our guide.

    September 12, 2016

    It's early morning here in the Great Northwest: 2:00 A.M. I was standing outside stargazing when an experience I once had up north came to mind. I was in Valdez, living ten miles out of town, and a lunar eclipse was about to happen that night. So when it came time, I drove out to a flat area with no trees near the Lowe river to watch it. I stood next to my car; it was a crisp, clear night; no pollution in the air to dull the intensity of starlight. Then it began, the eclipse.

    I watched the Earth cast its shadow over the moon; I remember it seemed to move rather quickly. I let that image and its real counterpart burn into my brain with no other thoughts of any technical or poetic nature to muck it up. Just me on this quiet, rocky bank staring at the shadow of our planet, proof that it actually exists in space.

    In this state of mind, facilitated by Matanuska Valley pot and coffee, the Earth finally completely covered the moon. And then it happened. The sensation of being adrift in outer space. My legs wobbled. Instinctively, I reached for the hood of my car to steady myself. I recall feeling in the pit of my stomach that sensation of weightlessness, of falling. If you've ever spent time on the ocean fishing or just traveling along on a small boat, you've probably experienced what I mean. On a rough sea, walking across the deck, the boat might abruptly, and I mean abruptly, drop several feet. For a long moment you are adrift in gravity-free space.

    Staring at the moon, or rather, Earth's shadow, I could definitely feel that we were moving through space, cast adrift , untethered. Ordinarily, I think, we feel a sense of permanence or rigidity with regard to the planet and ourselves strewn about riding it. We're fixed and held in place and the rest of the universe is moving, receding away in all directions. Not true.

    What could be more precarious and utterly magical than life on this planet? was one of my afterthoughts back home in my cabin resting securely on solid ground. We take so much for granted, we assume, our attention and our minds are turned inward, and rightly so in most cases in order to survive. However, every so often, I think, we people of the Earth should take a moment to realize how incredibly fortunate we are to be alive now, to bear witness to the fact that we live in outer space, a very haphazard and spectacular place to be. And we can prove it.

    September 3, 2016

He swam upstream against an imaginary current in an imaginary sea he called the way things are.

    August 21, 2016

Costco: Stop Selling Disease and Suffering
Petition: Direct Action Everywhere - Video

A recent Direct Action Everywhere (DxE) investigation shows horrifying abuse of pigs
at Hormel’s Farmer John, a major Costco supplier in central California.

    August 6, 2016

The Right Stuff


Astronaut Tracy Caldwell-Dyson

    August 5, 2016

He thought if he chose the proper terms to describe what he was thinking of,
he'd have a more correct assessment of their validity,
of what lies behind them.

The terms became mantras of a certain consciousness of reality
that would set him free.

He actually believed it.

He was constricted and fearful of acting incorrectly otherwise.
The illusion of control he felt certain he possessed would abandon him.
And he would therefore be subject to punishment from some corner.

He deserved it and would wait,
blindly creating the circumstances for its arrival.

Panic would threaten to disable him, engulf his spirit,
if he forgot them, these magical words and ideas.

Armed thus with his very own tablet of truths,
he ventured forth into the unknown of day-to-day existence.

Meanwhile, his real self, the one who cared and empathized and belonged
and enjoyed life for its own sake, waited off-stage for his cue.

"I must live according to the truth,"
he would say to himself.

He was the most dangerous man in the world.

    July 30, 2016

    Two things stand out in America right now; cotemporaneously, as it were. Actually, there's lots of things that stand out, but as with politicians, the advertising industry, and your generic used-car salesman, I'm choosing these two in order to slant an argument.


    1) The mysterious and unexplainable fascination in America with Donald Trump,


    2) The mysterious and unexplainable fascination in America with zombies.

    Surely, there must be a connection!

    [There's also the fascination with watching sharks eat people, but that's another story.]

    July 27, 2016


Care2Petitions - July 27, 2016

    On our way to the Olympic National Forest the other day for a hike, a friend and I drove through Trump country. We passed some buildings on the highway and hanging from a garage door was a huge, dark blue banner with large yellow letters. Under TRUMP were the words: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

    If that's his slogan, it's the first time I've seen it. I was feeling pretty good at the time. It was a bright, sunny morning in the Northwest, temperature around 65, the air was perfect. Considering the area, seeing the word TRUMP in giant letters wasn't terribly surprising or disturbing. One would expect nothing else, in fact. But the slogan, it was like getting punched in the gut.

    My friend was driving, so I had time to parse this thing out. The gut punch: I didn't know America had fallen into ungreatness, that we were not the top dog anymore. We've been surpassed by those we consider less great. How could that have happened? Poor leadership, no doubt. The fact that the Republican Congress routinely and spitefully blocked any chance at true greatness for the past eight years need not be considered here. It's a competition, after all.

    What exactly does it mean by GREAT? Oxford dictionary defines it as both 'above the normal or average' and 'very large and imposing'. But I really don't think that's what's alluded to here, in this context.

    It's a black hole of empty meaningless emotions. We stare into the abyss of GREAT searching for redemption, longing to rid ourselves of the onerous yoke of normalcy. We may not have been thinking about it at the time--who drives around wondering about America's greatness?--but now, here it is. We didn't know. We've lost former Greatness, whatever that may have been. A time when we presumed superiority on all major fronts, in every category, globally. Could that be it? Why else say AGAIN?

    The slogan implies that America is not whatever that was anymore, an undefinable condition in any practical terms. A vague feeling of diminished self-esteem comes over us, weakening our resolve and determination. Why bother to persevere with what we're doing, with how we're living our lives and what we're striving for? What's the point? We must pursue this greatness, we must find it AGAIN!

    The most important word in the slogan, of course, is AMERICA. Objectively, ideally, America is a micro-cosm of the world. Every ethnic group, culture, and faith is represented. An integrated whole working together, as well as possible, supported by dint of law and mutual respect as americans. To identify with that is to realize a level of consciousness above that of other countries whose people identify only with their own ethnicity and ways--their culture and social norms and customs. America has customs and traditions that are for all the people. July 4th is one such that stands out.

    That's the cliff notes idea of America, the land of the free. However, the word in that slogan is intended to be interpreted purely subjectively. It's code. What it means to each person who reads it is uniquely different. Anyone who feels America the country has indeed lost respect for itself and is in need of a resurgence will fall for it, believing somehow that the word in the slogan means what he wants it to. Its key intention is to engender patriotism. To transcend our separate self as a true american would, to bring back greatness to our country. And how do we do that? Why, by putting Donald Trump in charge, one of the many people responsible for selling us out to the world at large.

    We hiked for a few miles up above Snow Creek. It was a beautiful, quiet, relaxing day. At home, my cat-friend Mariah was waiting for me. She rolled around on the ground, her way of saying she's happy to see me. I made a pot of coffee and sat in the cool shade surrounded by trees and dense brush. It was late afternoon, the sun was behind the tree tops. Mariah beside me, I breathed in the sweet-smelling air and smiled. I couldn't help myself--I felt great.

    July 2, 2016

"Take my love, take my land,
Take me where I cannot stand,
I don't care, I'm still free,
You can't take the sky from me."

    June 27, 2016

    I retired from commercial fishing 20 years ago. This morning I awoke to a sunny day here in the Northwest. The cool air coming through the window had a certain feel to it as I lay in my bunk waiting for the coffee pot to finish gurgling. Otherwise, it was dead quiet, not even the many birds in the area were singing. Something about the way everything clicked together that brought to mind a time in Chenega in Prince William Sound, Alaska, getting ready for a longline trip, building gear. It was mid-March, a bright sun pierced sharply through the clean, crisp air; pockets of snow were on the narrow dock still. Our boat was a 90-foot power scow, so we had plenty of deck space to work.

    This morning I awoke to a sunny day here in the Northwest and in Chenega 25 years ago. I miss that life. There was a completeness about it. Even when not occupied with the many tasks required, including running the boat, you were always immersed in the present. The immediacy of the physical world in detail, the sights; the smells; the touch of cold, wet steel on your fingers; the salt air and occasional spray off a rough sea; the tiredness in your bones, all worked to bring you out of whatever daydreaming you might ordinarily pursue when on land. Society and the world at large--including any personal problems you might be going through--may as well be on Mars for all the relevance it had. You learn a lot of stuff about yourself, sometimes things you don't like but can change. Fishing, traveling, on the ocean and the Bering Sea, there can be a sense of timelessness. By that I don't mean stifling boredom--there is that sometimes--but rather the feeling of belonging to an eight-thouand-year-old brotherhood of all those people who have ever gone to sea.

    June 26, 2016

    It's early in the year yet, the half for those interested in such things as national government and international relations is yet to come. Nonetheless, I would like to take this time to nominate the Dumbest Man in America: actor Ben Affleck. Any man who would cheat on Jennifer Garner needs to have his head examined. It happened over a year ago, I know, but all this time I've been stunned, dazed, unable to comment. She was Elektra, for goodness sakes! It must be heady living in those lofty heights of society where Ms. Garner is just another chick. Jesus.

    But maybe that's true for almost all men with partners, we tend to take them for granted somewhere along the line and start looking elsewhere. I said that seriously; nonetheless, I still can't get over it. Who would cheat on Jennifer Garner? What else is there to look for?

    June 13, 2016

    Is anybody else in the nature-documentary watching world sick to death of David Attenborough's voice? Is he the only person on the planet who's permitted to narrate nature shows? I'm no zoologist, but it seems to me that there's much more to any animal's life than the struggle for survival. If you've watched enough of them, and I have, you become conditioned. Your gut churns, anxiety ramps up, you brace yourself for the inevitable preditor/prey scene. Okay, I know animal's kill and eat one another, but why must Sir Attenborough drool and linger over such scenes? You can almost hear him salivating. I love nature shows, but anymore, in spite of an interesting program description, if it's being narrated by Attenborough, I can't get myself to watch it.

    Please, nature documentary makers--and you know who you are--can't you find someone else to narrate, and can't you be more imaginative when it comes to the lives of animals?

    There was a show he did, I forget the title, where a pack of Orcas harried a sperm whale and calf relentlessly until finally, the mother exhausted and out-maneuvered, they killed the calf. It took a really long time and was extremely painful to watch. I kept waiting for it to end, knowing what was going to happen as did everyone else, I'm sure, and wanted the scene to change. But no, not Attenborough. He hung in there, quietly, depressingly narrating along to the bitter end, the camera never stopping. I watched the rest of the program, but I've never watched it again because of that scene, forever entangled with David Attenborough's voyeuristic voice as he hovered over the attack.

    Salacious is a word that comes to mind.

    June 9, 2016

    Trophy hunting--what's the deal? Below is a link to the photo gallery page of Hunting Lease's website. They advertise as "Your #1 Source for Places to Hunt." It's big business. I looked at a few of the pictures. The animals are spectactularly beautiful. Kneeling behind, usually holding onto the symbolic horn, if the animal has one, is a smug, fat-faced hero. Here was this elk or moose or bear or deer standing around in a small meadow on a quiet day foraging, munching on grass and roots, minding his own business. And our hero, the man of the hour, sneaked up on him, as close as he dares, and with scoped-out high-powered rifle or complex bow (much more painful, takes a long time to die) this ego-driven asshole shoots it. Death. For no reason. And brags about it, he's proud. The heroes are usually plump guys; they're not doing this for the food, they obviously get plenty. It's for sport, for fun, a day with the family in the woods, an outing, and don't forget to bring the potato salad and beer. Let's go kill something!

    They see this for their children, some as young as eight or nine, as a rite-of-passage. Crossing a threshold into manhood. It's an aberration that thrives in our society. More African trophies come into America every year than any other country in the world. There are websites galore celebrating kills. Competition for top hunter is fierce. A sense of belonging to a group of people who consider themselves a cut above the average man who doesn't hunt for ego-gratification. They seek out the most beautiful animals, the most splendid and noble, an elk, for instance, with an elaborate horn display and who holds himself with genuine pride and strength of character, and kill it as if to rob it of the spirit they could never possess on their own.

    It's a global business and pursuit, and the bottomline is not just about the money, it's about something that's empty and meaningless--the right to brag as though true manhood, or womanhood, (freedom from a sense of inadequacy?) has been indelibly etched into their souls. Cowards. They can't feel good about themselves ordinarily over accomplishments that mean something, that have purpose. This is their way. "I see you, beautiful animal, and to prove that I am superior, I'm going to kill you, end your life here in these woods, your home and range, take away everything you are or ever will be, all the experiences you would've had, for the sake of my self-esteem." How people like that can function in normal society is a testament to how little presence--empathizing with one's surroundings--is needed to get by. You can live completely in your own world, in a world cut-off from true nature, from being and feeling a part of it. A real sense of belonging.

    No hero of the woods hunting for trophies will ever know his true self by robbing it from an animal far more honorable and worthy of respect than they. To kill something for no real subsistence or otherwise reason and as a consequence believe that anything real about yourself has changed is the height of insanity.

        The animal is dead by my hand and I feel wonderful about it. I smile from ear to ear with pride at my accomplishment. [Here's where I have to stop writing and try to imagine what's actually going on.] I killed an animal unneccessarily, for no good practical reason, and it makes me feel so marvelous about myself that I want to shout it from the highest peak. I am filled to overflowing with self-admiration.

    I'm missing something here. Trophy/sport hunting is a one-sided event. The hunter's motivation is completely self-centered. That can also be said about someone who kills for food, to survive, but with an obvious difference. To kill for food is a biological imperative, to kill for sport is purely for ego satisfaction. And, not only are the animals unwilling participants in the ritualistic event, no other human shares in it as well. A solitary affair, a singular moment, an act of independence. However, that is an illusion. It's sanctioned, approved of, and encouraged by the world of trophy hunting. So, in reality, that whole collective shares in it if only because of the emotional and moral support given to the individual.

    For eighteen years I was a commercial fisherman in Alaska. For the last ten of those, I majored in longlining. We spent summers fishing halibut down in the Aleutians and out by the Pribilofs on the Bering Sea. But all that fish went for food, for people to eat. Although there can be a great deal of satisfaction in commercial fishing--the adrenaline and thrill of catching an unusually large halibut, for instance--I can rightly say I never killed anything expressly for the fun of it. That, to me, signifies a mental illness and an emptiness of heart.

    The only real that's changed is the death of an animal that didn't need to die.

Hunting Lease's Photo Gallery of Assholes and Majestic Animals

The Emotional Lives of Animals

    June 1, 2016

    So you like chicken, do ya'? Here is a video of an undercover investigation of Tyson Foods by Mercy for Animals:

Mercy for Animals Slams Tyson over Tortured Chickens | June 1, 2016

MFA's Undercover Investigations

    May 28, 2016

    Quote of the week: "If Jesus had a gun, he'd be a l i v e today." Homer Simpson. Maybe it was the way he said it, I don't know, but whenever I thought of it that day, I had to laugh. I passed it on to a friend who laughed too, though not as hard as I did, then asked, "Who said that? Trump?" He was serious. There's a mindset going on here, a perception. I hardly ever pay attention to the news on TV or radio anymore, I'm not sure why; nonetheless, it looks like Trump is going to be chosen as the Republican nominee for president. Could it be among the populace who supports him that his clownish persona is an attractive force? A person who could be confused with Homer Simpson? Trump is liable to say anything at any time, just like Homer. And the dumber it is, the more down to earth he seems and more appealing to his followers. Homer Simpson for president. Someone the ignorant and bellicose can feel comfortable with. Could we do worse?

    May 20, 2016

    Mariah, My Cat Friend

    | |

    I treat her with all the respect I would give a panther because, quite frankly, she thinks she is one. I found her at the local animal shelter locked in a wire cage; she was on death row, scheduled to be killed soon because she'd been there for a maximum allowable amount of time. Apparently, at the Port Townsend, Washington animal shelter, animals have an expiration date. There was no one to pet her or sit with her or scratch her neck. People walking by, hearing strange noises, confined in a small space, she probably wondered what was going on, how come nobody wanted anything to do with her. She must've been scared, lonely, and unhappy; I know I would've been.

    But now, she lives with us out in the woods. Happy, playful, adventurous, gutsy, and free, exploring the wilds of Washington. Hiding in the tall grass this time of year, you can't see her until she jumps out, in spite of the color contrast. And she runs like the wind--hence, her name--which she seems to do for the fun of it, stretched out, light on her feet, moving like a jet-black feather undulating along. She eats well and--my fault--is addicted to Temptations. I think that's all she'd eat if she could get away with it. When she sleeps with me, she needs to be touching, pressing against me. And to think how close she came to being put down in order to free up space for younger, more adoptable kittens?

    If you find yourself wanting a cat for a companion and friend, if you feel secure enough about yourself to not mind an animal around you who can be quite independent and demanding at times, try your local shelter. You won't be disappointed and you'll be doing a good thing, rescuing. Except to go to the vet whenever that may be necessary, Mariah will never again know a cage; she's free to roam wherever she likes. She's been here since last July and by now, no doubt, has many lairs and secret places all her own. She's happy and healthy and has a home where she's loved and cared about. Also, it can't be overemphasized, having a panther for a friend is not a bad idea.

    P.S.: This “Adopt a Shelter Cat Month,” You Can Make a Difference for Felines in Need | ASPCA

    May 6, 2016

    Do you think Samuel L. Jackson talks the way he does in movies and commercials normally? I mean, say he's at a dinner party with several others. He's at one end of a long table and he shouts at a woman at the other end, "Hey, you gonna hold on to that bowl of sweet potatoes all night, bitch? Pass 'em down." Or, it's the holiday season and he says to a guy dressed as Santa Claus standing on a corner trying to get donations for the local Salvation Army, "You try slidn' down my chimney into my house, asshole, and I'll blow your shit away. Got that, fat boy?" Maybe not.

    Bernie Sanders' people have begun fear tactics. They advocate choosing him by default because some folks who apparently know such things don't think Hillary can trump Trump. Is that a sufficiently valid reason for nominating Bernie? Would a reactionary like Trump be really that bad for the country? Is his popularity among the rural set a backlash to having a black man for president the past eight years?

    I promised myself at the beginning of all this election stuff that I wouldn't even bother to vote unless Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts was in the running. Unfortunately, she's not interested. Bernie Sanders is an honest man; Donald Trump is a showman, appealing to the worst emotions we Americans can muster. Hillary Clinton would be up against a hostile Congress who would be as cooperative with her as they have been with President Obama. She brings a lot of baggage with her, not the least of which is her husband. The Republicans will focus on that, embroiling her in one meaningless and irrelevant investigation after another, hindering any good she might otherwise do.

    Politics. I'm voting for Samuel L. Jackson. At least you know what you're getting. Maybe.

    December 12, 2015

    Not that anybody besides myself noticed, but I haven't written anything here since last June. I've been involved in writing stories and smoking pot. It's legal here in Washington, you know, or at least, I think it is. I haven't felt like commenting about anything out there. What's going on in the Middle East will always be going on. It's their way. Failed states are becoming commonplace. As far as the group known as ISIS goes, there doesn't seem to be much agreement on what to do about them or cooperation in the doing. The Turks shot down a Russian bomber that may or may not have passed over their airspace enroute to drop some death on the deserving ISIS slime, killing the crew, people with families and friends and lives, just doing their job. Their reason for being where they were had to have been obvious to the Turks. They don't live in a vacuum, they knew perfectly well what was going on between Russia and ISIS. That ship was not there to bomb Turkey; what possible reason could they have? But, nonetheless, they shot them down claiming they had the right to defend their country, protect their people, and so forth. Idiocy, political pettiness, and lack of cooperation are running the world into chaos.

    And, I haven't had much interest in the absurdities of the premature presidential race, what with morons like Trump running. The fact that he leads the Republican Party's offerings is a testament to how imperceptive the American people can be. I grew up on the streets of West Philadelphia in a mixed neighborhood. At an early age, I learned to read people, to see through their surface persona--their act--and pretense. Donald Trump, besides being incredibly naive and stupid, is a punk. That glowering, disgruntled, arrogant look he puts on his face for show is just that. And even if genuine, who the hell wants a president who's that overbearing and incapable of empathy? He wants to compile a database of all muslims in the country, including those who've lived here as fine, upstanding, law-abiding Americans for generations. This is what he offers: A draconian society under aggressive authoritarian control and an adversarial posture towards the rest of the world.

    But none of the above is why I felt the need to bring attention to something. Here's what is:

    Man dies 6 years after he was slammed into wall by deputy, disabled
    December 11, 2015 - The Seattle Times

    Man slammed into wall by King County deputy in 2009 dies; coroner rules it a homicide
    December 11, 2015 - Q13Fox News

    Man dies 6 years after he was slammed into wall by deputy, disabled
    December 11, 2015 - - FORUM

    There's a video that's really hard to take. Like I said, I grew up in a neighborhood where fist-fights on the street were not uncommon. So, that level of violence right in front of me doesn't traumatize me. But that video was a shocker, especially considering that the man had stopped and put his hands up, even though the cop was not wearing his police uniform. If this had happened to a black man, there'd be protests, marches, and probably some destruction. But because he's white, it gets swept under the carpet. Police brutality is color blind, everyone stands the chance of being victimized.

    Here's the picture I see from articles I've read on the matter and especially from watching the video:

      He wasn't in his own neighborhood. He was in the city surrounded by strangers, walking down an alley. Two men, dressed in non-descript black clothes, started chasing him and yelling for him to stop, they say. He ran, naturally enough. Anyone in his right mind, unarmed and in a questionable part of town, would've done the same. Wouldn't you?

      But eventually, one cop caught up to him. He stopped and raised his hands, still, more than likely, not knowing what the hell was going on. He was just standing there, his back to a wall, surrendering or, not aware that these two were sheriffs, was trying to control the situation. Who are these guys and what do they want with me? he may have been thinking. And then it happened.

      By the video, he'd not taken an aggressive stance. He wasn't attacking or resisting, he was standing limply, watchful but non-threatening. In fact, had he'd been braced, defiant, defensive, he may not have fallen; at least, not that far. Mister Harris was standing still with his hands up. The cop could've handcuffed him and put him in custody until the situation got straightened out. But he chose instead to attack with extreme violence, without visible provocation, propelling Mister Harris backwards, smashing his head into a concrete wall. It didn't look to me like a professional move; this was all personal.

    Isn't there any psychological testing performed on prospective deputies to weed out nutjobs like this asshole? Do they hire anybody who comes in off the street?

    The reason the DA's Office and the Sheriff's Department gave for not pursuing criminal charges against King County Deputy Matthew Paul was because Mister Harris didn't ultimately die as a result of the officer's push, but rather because his head hit the wall. Splitting hairs taken to a whole new level of legal obfuscation and absurdity. Are Newton's Laws of Motion not recognized in King County courtrooms? The intimate relation between cause and its undeniable, direct effect apparently has no jurisdiction in that contrived space. I can see it being the case in Kansas, but not here. No one was responsible, it was an accident.

    However, somehow managing to adopt the opposite position, without admitting its contradictory implication, they handed Misses Harris a 10-million-dollar settlement, clearly accepting responsibility. Why else would they do that? And who is the agent of this responsibility? Why, Deputy Matthew Paul.

    Despite this inescapable conclusion, he got off with no more than having to take some additional training. That's not right. At the very least, he should be fired, and, in a just world, would be prosecuted for the death of Christopher Sean Harris.

    June 30, 2015

    Save Endangered Wildlife from Rand Paul Attack | Petition -

    June 17, 2015

    All right! Rick Perry, Jeb Bush, and Donald Trump have thrown their hats into the presidential ring. Now, if Daffy Duck would join them, we'd have the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. I'm sure there must be stupider people, people even more out of touch with everyday reality. We'll hafta wait and see.

    March 6, 2015

      ""God is still up there, and He promised to maintain the seasons and that cold and heat would never cease as long as the earth remains...The arrogance of people to think that we, human beings, would be able to change what He is doing in the climate is to me outrageous." [Doonesbury, March 6}

    This moron leads the committee that forms federal policy concerning the environment. He's from the great state of Oklahoma where the increase in the frequency and size of tornadoes over the recent years has apparently gone unnoticed. Perhaps when the good senator was in conference with God, he missed it. God told me that we were presently in the midst of a global extinction event, the transitional phase leading to ecological chaos, collapse of the biosphere and the unraveling of the web of life, to set the stage for the next era. But, nobody believes me. If only I was a senator.

    January 2, 2015

    "If we'd been born where they were born
    and taught what they were taught,
    we would believe what they believe."

    A sign inside a church in Northern Ireland,
    explaining the origin of intolerance and hate.

    December 22, 2014

    Has anyone ever noticed that Superman is an illegal alien? He's good for the country, don't get me wrong, what with standing up for truth, justice, and the American way--whatever that is. But the law is the law. Superman arrived here as a small child, his parents had died and with their last breath, put him into a small spaceship and sent him off. He was adopted by Kansas farmers, the salt of the Earth without whom we'd starve; you can't get more American than that. They raised and nurtured him, sending him to the local school. Yet the Republicans in Congress want him deported, gone, out of here. They see no benefit to Superman as an American. Jesus! Before he became a newspaper reporter, he worked on his adopted parents' farm supplying food to the masses, as do thousands of other illegal aliens. The big picture is being ignored.

    In different conflicted parts of the world, migrations are going on. People desperately seeking refuge from the storms that threaten their existence and that of their children. Can we, as people living in a country built almost exclusively on immigrants flooding our shores in times of need or strife, turn them away, children looking for a safe place to be and food to eat? Can we demand that Superman leave? Suppose he doesn't want to?

    December 12, 2014

    The Oregon attempt to label GMO "food" failed. Apparently, the majority of Oregonians don't want to know the ingredients of the food they eat. The supporters can blame an inadequate information campaign. It's too bad. Besides its obvious impact on the environment and natural species, we, and they, have no real idea what the practical consequences of eating unnatural food is over the long haul, say--30 or 40 years from now. Milkweed has been all but eliminated by the presence of GMO crops, putting the migrating Monarch butterfly close to the endangered species list.

      "Genetically Modified Crops: Widespread adoption of herbicide-resistant corn and soybeans has resulted in the loss of more than 80 million acres of monarch habitat in recent years. The planting of these crops genetically modified to resist the non-selective systemic herbicide glyphosate (Roundup®) allows growers to spray fields with this herbicide instead of tilling to control weeds. Milkweeds survive tilling but not the repeated use of glyphosate. This habitat loss is significant since these croplands represent more than 30% of the summer breeding area for monarchs."
      --- Monarch Watch

    The Missing Monarchs | Slate.Com
    Monsanto’s Roundup and genetically modified crops are harming everybody’s favorite butterfly.
    Monarch Butterflies | The Xerces Society
    Monarch Butterflies are Dying, and Roundup is a Suspect
    August 29, 2014 - The Des Moines Register

    Monsanto, and others, want to own the world by owning the rights to food. That's the other issue, the obese gorilla in the room no one wants to talk about. If they can slip it to you unnoticed, under the radar, who cares? Not enough folks in Oregon, it would seem.

    Here's something all you voters for ignorance can chew on:

    Anyone for a more in-depth study, go to: Monsanto

    November 25, 2014

    Witnesses Saw Michael Brown Attacking–and Others Saw Him Giving Up
    November 25 - The Atlantic
    Evidence supports officer’s account of shooting in Ferguson
    October 23 - The Washington Post
    Ferguson Witnesss Told Investigators That Michael Brown Charged Cop "Like a Football Player. Head Down"
    November 24 - The Smoking Gun
    Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown, says source
    August 20 - FOX NEWS
    'A dozen witnesses' say Ferguson teen attacked cop before shooting
    August 29 - New York Post

    "The grand jury in Missouri failed to indict Darren Wilson, the Ferguson police officer who shot and killed an unarmed Black teenager, Michael Brown."
    --- ACLU

    I keep seeing the word "unarmed" linked to Michael Brown as though that was the crux of the matter. Does anybody care that he was 6-foot-four-inches and 300 pounds at the army-joining age of 18? What the hell do ya' mean, unarmed? No witnesses refute the officer's story that Brown was attacking him through the window of the police car and when he got outside. The officer was half his size and twice his age. Was he supposed to let himself be beaten senseless with the possibility that his gun would be taken and used on him? He defended himself in the only way he could. Brown'd just robbed a store, it was on camera, he grabbed the store owner by the throat and then just walked out. Afterwards, he and his buddies were walking down the middle of the street in the face of an oncoming police car. Attitude? Confrontational? Defiant? Do they care?

    → Cheerful... Warm... Friendly... Engaging →

    Brown cursed at the officer who told him and his friends to get out of the street, then reached through the car window and started punching and grabbing. Are we to lament the loss of this fine, upstanding citizen, this pillar of the community? What might he have become? A guidance counselor? A lawyer specializing in civil rights cases? A missionary toiling at a refugee camp somewhere in our conflicted world? Who knows.

    I wasn't there so I don't know what really went down and I don't believe the real unbiased truth will ever surface. Details subject to individual perception vary, the general stream of events, however, can be understood based on experience. But, it probably doesn't matter. The majority of whites believed O.J. Simpson was guilty and the majority [if not all] blacks were convinced he was innocent -- same evidence. So what really happened means little, the show's the thing. Ultimately, nobody who didn't personally know Brown gives a rat's ass.

    The opportunistic black youths--the criminal element--find it as an excuse to rob, loot, pilage, and burn. They couldn't care less about Michael Brown, whoever he is. And the so-called community leaders, like Sharpton and Jackson, whose livelihoods depend on maintaining and perpetuating a victim-identity for all blacks, show up to officially recognize and sanction proceedings--bless it and make it credibile--and to grant their imprimatur to channel outrage in all the usual self-destructive and tragic directions. They speak of dreams having once again been undermined. But the dreams they speak of--never described in practical terms--will never be realized, will always be placed beyond reach. They offer pie in the sky, to be eaten some time in the distant future. Elsewise, they're out of a job. Such inflated irrelevant rhetoric has nothing to do with the incident at hand, the cause. Michael Brown was no retiring choir boy, and to try to cast him as a teen, with all the innocent childlike connotations that word implies, is deliberately misleading.

    Variations on the headline: "Police Officer Shoots Unarmed Teen" evokes an image of a 13-year-old walking across the street minding his own business--maybe thinking about his science project--when an evil cop drives up and guns him down. Misperception and self-righteous indignation obfuscate not only the actual facts concerning the incident, but also the different characters and personalities of the people involved as though that didn't matter. We mathematize it and idealize it for our own advantage. Bambi meets Godzila. I don't think so.

    Jesse Jackson, world renown rabble-rouser, even though he doesn't know either person involved and probably hasn't bothered to read witness accounts, has decided that the grand jury verdict is wrong and he is right. Immaculate Conception? Or, the knee-jerk reflex of a professional and highly skilled opportunist and self-promoter?

    Who's writing this script and why must it be religiously adhered to? Where's the imagination? Who's really doing the oppressing? It's always the same, the pattern repeats, pull the video off the shelf. When does it end, this mutually co-dependent dysfunctional identity crisis that politicians and academics call race relations? If a black youth strives to realize existing opportunities or create new ones, he risks forfeiting his victim status and thus can no longer hide behind it as an excuse for failure, for not beleiving in himself, and for some, acting out. We've seen it all before, the play remains indelibly etched into the drama of our American psyche, ready to be activated after the next arbitrary incident. But no further.

Acting Out
by Andrea Mathews, L.P.C. - Blog - Psychology Today
Manipulation and Identity

    November 22, 2014

    November 14, 2014

    Concerning the imposition of Democracy onto other countries:

    "A system that had been ingrained for generations could not be easily undone by change from the top." (Doris Kearns Goodwin).

    November 11, 2014

    "South Korea is the only country known to have large, intensive farming systems to supply the demand for dog meat. The dogs held captive on these farms suffer from the day they are born in a barren wire cage until the day they are forcibly removed and killed in a makeshift slaughterhouse."
    --- Humane Society International

    November 5, 2014

    Here are just a few reasons why the Northern Rockies are a bad place to be a wolf:

      In Idaho and Montana, there are no statewide quotas on the number of wolves that can be killed.
      In both states, it’s legal to kill mother wolves and pups.
      In Idaho, the state is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars each year to subsidize wolf extermination.
      In Montana, you can get a license to kill up to 5 wolves for only $19.
      In Idaho, you can kill up to 10 wolves for $11.50 per wolf.

    October 28, 2014

    "On Friday [October 24, 2014], the ASPCA joined forces with the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of South Carolina (USASC) to rescue a dozen dogs from a dog fighting operation in Columbia, South Carolina.

    "The investigation—which began as a drug trafficking case—took a tragic turn when fighting dogs were discovered on the Gaston, SC property. Upon arriving at the scene, ASPCA responders found several adult dogs and puppies chained and anchored to car axles. Severely emaciated and dehydrated, the dogs had nothing but trash barrels to protect them from the elements. Many exhibited scars and injuries associated with dog fighting.

    "Responders also found dog fighting paraphernalia on the property, along with the remains of deceased dogs. "
    --- ASPCA

    Investigation Documents Cruelty of Bear Baiting
    Only In South Carolina
    Video included - The Humane Society of the U.S.

    "Bear baiting is an appalling— and shockingly legal “sport” that is all too common in South Carolina. These poor creatures are mutilated, tied down, and rendered defenseless while cruel participants sic aggressive hunting dogs on them so they can watch the fight.

    "Bears forced into the brutal world of bear baiting are mutilated by having their canine teeth and claws cruelly removed so that they are unable to defend themselves. Then they are forced to undergo several “fights” per day where they are tied down and ruthless dogs that have been trained to attack are unleashed upon them. The bears are viciously tortured for up to three minutes per fight, and a match is considered over when the dogs succeed in dragging the bear to the ground.

    "The wounded bears do not receive medical attention and are instead forced to suffer through as many fights as they can survive. In addition, the attack dogs are often injured or even killed during fights. Dogs belong in the safety of loving homes and should not be used for such a barbaric, dangerous purpose by humans whose goal is to train them to be aggressive toward other animals for the sake of twisted entertainment.

    "The South Carolina government must immediately outlaw this disgusting sport and begin strict enforcement of the ban to end the suffering of these poor creatures."
    --- Ban Tortuous Bear Baiting 'Sport' | Animal Petitions

    What the frell is wrong with South Carolina? I thought Mississippi and Texas were the most ignorant states, along with Idaho, of course. We can't forget Idaho, the Killing State with its war on wolves and just about anything else that walks, crawls, or flies. As long as there are people in this country who enjoy watching dogs fight to the death and helpless bears being attacked by packs of dogs, we will never be civilized or justify a moral high ground with respect to any other country.

    October 24, 2014

    "Before Obamacare, there had never been a confirmed case of Ebola in the U.S."
    — Nick Muzin, Deputy Chief of Staff and Senior Advisor for Sen. Ted Cruz
    -- Say What? -- Doonesbury

    October 15, 2014

    "Let's be honest. Does anyone not believe that Congresswoman Annie Kuster is ugly as sin? And I hope I haven't offended sin. If looks really matter and if this race is at all close, give a decided edge to Marlinda Garcia...Sad to say, but the drag queens are more attractive than Annie Kuster."
    --- NH state Rep. Steve Vaillancourt, on U.S. Rep. Ann Kuster's re-election campaign.
    From Doonesbury Say What?

    September 18, 2014

    "The dairy factory farm knew her as #4391.

    "But to me, her name was Grace.

    "Yesterday, Mercy For Animals broke my undercover investigation exposing heartbreaking cruelty to mother cows and their calves at a Leprino Foods dairy supplier. Cheese from Leprino ends up at Pizza Hut, Papa John’s, and Domino’s restaurants around the world.

    "Today I want to tell you the story of Grace, one of the cows I met during my time working this case. After reading her story, please give today to help us stop the suffering of other dairy cows just like Grace .

    "Grace was used, abused, and then discarded by the dairy industry.

    "She was treated as a mere machine — not an individual worthy of love or kindness.

    "Like all dairy cows, Grace was impregnated and had her babies taken from her immediately after birth. She endured this trauma time after time after time.

    "When Grace’s milk production slowed, she was impregnated again and the heartbreaking cycle would continue. The dairy industry’s plan for Grace — and all other dairy cows confined on factory farms — was to push her to physical limits until she “ran dry,” and then send her to slaughter.

    "But Grace’s story ended differently.

    "One day I witnessed a worker examining Grace. I could tell by her frantic bellowing that something was wrong. Grace’s baby had died in her womb.

    "My supervisor told me he knew Grace’s condition was so bad that he should call a veterinarian, but he refused to do so. Instead, he decided to proceed without a veterinarian’s assistance.

    "And that’s when things went horribly wrong.

    "The workers began removing the dead calf even though Grace’s body wasn’t ready to deliver her baby. She screamed in pain and strained in misery as the workers forcefully pulled the dead calf from her body — piece by piece .

    "I watched helplessly as workers used a chain to finish removing the calf’s body from Grace, making the prolonged, botched procedure even more excruciating for her.

    "After what seemed like an eternity, her dead calf was removed and thrown into a truck.

    "Grace should have been examined and given medical care after her gruesome ordeal, but instead she was left to suffer without any care or kindness at all. Grace was treated like trash.

    "The next day, Grace died.

    "I wish I could say that this horrific scene was unusual, but it’s not. Dairy factory farms regularly cut corners to maximize profit, and it is the animals who pay the ultimate price .

    "And that’s why I risk my safety to be an undercover investigator with Mercy For Animals. Because animals like Grace deserve a voice. They deserve justice .

    "But I can’t do this work alone. Now I need your support. I need you to stand with Mercy For Animals as they pursue justice on behalf of Grace, and all the other cows I saw being beaten, kicked, punched, and dragged by tractors at this factory farm."
    --- Mercy for Animals

    Make a special donation

    September 17, 2014

    When did the National Football League become equal to the United States Government Judicial System? I missed that memo. If an ordinary slob knocks out his wife he gets arrested and probably does jail time. No ifs, ands or buts. The NFL protested criminal charges stating that it would be tantamount to punishing them (Adrian Peterson and Ray Rice) twice as they were already disciplined by the leagues ruling government. What? It's nice that the commissioner, with considerable persuasion by corporate entities, punished Rice and Peterson for their separate violent infractions, but it does not usurp the power of the US Judiciary or replace legal judgements. These people, the NRA included, have lost their freaking minds. What arrogance and presumption.

    Rice and Peterson should be treated like any other citizen who commits violence and abuse against another, especially an impressionable, emotionally developing child. Losing or being suspended from your job is not a sufficient punishment for felony assault. For Rice's woman to stay with him after such public injury and humiliation is a testament to her low self-esteem, or fear.

    In this country there are separate laws for the rich and the poor. Now, we have to include separate rules for sports figures. However, we do have this:

    A Punch Is Seen, and a Player Is Out | September 8, 2014 - The New York Times
    Ray Rice Cut by Ravens and Suspended by N.F.L.
    Ravens cut Ray Rice after graphic video of assault against fiancee is released | September 9, 2014 - The Kansas City Star

    But, this disciplinary action by an organization he works for, like any other workplace, should not negate or supercede criminal action in a real live valid criminal court.

    September 15, 2014

    Yesterday morning I was up early, my head foggy from a late night of beer drinking. I sat on a stool at the counter in the center of the kitchen sipping my very first cup of coffee. When suddenly, a blonde, nazi kid jumped up from the floor, his face spread with an insane, big-eyed smile, and said something about a streudal. I recoiled off my stool backwards, slamming against the refrigerator, rocking its insides. The apparition continued with the demented smile as I stumbled to the kitchen drawer by the backdoor where I keep my gun. I pulled it out too far and it and all its contents dropped to the floor. I reached down for my 45, put one in the chamber and turned. He was gone. I scoured the area; there was no sign he'd ever been here. No streudal crumbs, nothing. Where did he come from? Is that one more thing I have to worry about now? Nazi children popping up in my kitchen out of the void? Or how about some man crouched where my dishwasher is supposed to be? Or a large bald-headed cartoon standing too close to my mom? Smiling? What's happening?

    And what's with this relatively new commercial approach where background noise makes it necessary to shout? Or not. Witness the oxy-clean voice. Who talks like that? Or that one where some guy is sitting on a bench with a view of the statue of liberty in the background and starts off by saying glibly: "Okay, so you drop 40 grand on a car..." What? Who the hell can afford to drop 40 thousand dollars on a car? If I had 40 thousand dollars, I'd move to Amsterdam and ride a bicycle.

    September 7, 2014

    Dear Republican Congressmen,

    "It is my conviction that a basis for the settlement of conflicting views would be found in the recognition of different types of attitude - a recognition not only of the existence of such types, but also the fact that every man is so imprisoned in his type that he is simply incapable of fully understanding another standpoint. Failing a recognition of this exacting demand, a violation of the other standpoint is practically inevitable".....Carl Jung

    "The more projections are thrust in between the subject and the environment, the harder it is for the ego to see through its illusions" (Jung, 1971, p. 147).

    September 5, 2014

    The USDA, with its covert contingent of mercenary assassins, is a force unto itself, operating completely without oversight, rules or controls of any kind. Their acronym, APHIS, stands for animal and plant health inspection service. Could anything so brutal and lethal be called a more innocuous name? Who are these people? Bloodlust is their hallmark and the indiscrimate death of all wildlife, rationalized by the flimsiest of excuses, is their mandate and mission. Ranchers refuse to spend the government subsidy money or take the time to protect their livestock from predators by other known means presently available. The simplest way is to shunt it off to the USDA, who then send in Wildlife Services. These rambos target everything by any methods available, including poison and traps. They poison waterholes killing off every creature who comes to drink. These people are off the reservation; they need to be reined in, put on a tight leash.

    That's how we deal with wildlife, already losing all their habitat and corridors of migration due to humans. When anything out there becomes inconvenient, we kill it.

  • USDA's Controversial Wildlife Services Refuses to Help Endangered Ocelot
    September 3, 2014 - Wild Earth Guardians
    WildEarth Guardians protects and restores the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the American West.

    "The Center and allies this week launched a new legal challenge against Wildlife Services, the rogue federal program that kills millions of wild animals each year. Our latest action is a notice of intent to sue the program over its large-scale, often secretive work in Idaho. Last year more than 3,000 coyotes, black bears, fishers, foxes, mountain lions and other species were killed by Wildlife Services in that state, using methods like aerial gunning, neck snares, traps and exploding poison caps.

    "We're asking that Wildlife Services halt these lethal activities, including plans to destroy beaver dams with explosives that will harm endangered bull trout, until an adequate and up-to-date environmental analysis of the program's impacts is prepared. "'Grizzly bears, lynx and bull trout are all suffering at the hands of Wildlife Services, and that needs to stop,' said the Center's new Idaho-based attorney, Andrea Santarsiere."
    --- 09/11/14 - Center for Biological Diversity

    "Washington wildlife officials have determined that the wolf they killed last week was the Huckleberry Pack's alpha female. It's devastating news: This killing could shatter the structure of the entire pack and her orphaned pups may face starvation this winter.

    "This is the second time in two years that Washington has targeted a pack because a livestock producer refused to do what was necessary to protect his stock. This has got to stop.

    "Two weeks ago the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife secretly sent a helicopter to kill up to four members of the Huckleberry pack. Thanks to your help we flooded the governor's office with calls and emails and soon the helicopter was grounded and the slaughter was called off -- but sadly help didn't come soon enough for the pack's matriarch."
    --- Center for Biological Diversity

    Groups threaten suit over federal agency’s trapping, poisoning of problem wildlife
    By Becky Kramer - - September 9, 2014 - The Spokesman Review

      "Wildlife Services is part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It grew out of federal predator removal programs designed to help the livestock industry take hold in the West. Wildlife Services describes its current mission as resolving conflicts “to allow people and wildlife to coexist.” But critics say the agency still puts too much emphasis on killing animals."

    "Last night, we were shocked to learn that the wolf killed two weeks ago by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) was the alpha female of the Huckleberry pack.

    "This is a massive blow to the wolf pack.

    "Contact the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Director Phil Anderson, and demand that he rescind the kill order immediately!

    "Make no mistake, WDFW has reaffirmed that the kill order on wolves in the Huckleberry pack is still in effect. Until the kill order is lifted, these wolves are not safe. WDFW, as well as ranch staff, continue to have authorization to remove up to three more wolves from the pack.

    "WDFW has grossly mismanaged the situation from the beginning - from the poor implementation of non-lethal methods to taking nearly two weeks to announce the fact that they had killed the most important member of the pack.

    "It was just two years ago that WDFW killed every single member of the Wedge pack in a highly controversial lethal control action that was also tragically mismanaged. There were only five breeding pairs in the entire state last year and wolves are still a state listed endangered species today.

    "Tell Director Phil Anderson to rescind the kill order NOW.

    "With the tragic loss of the alpha female, the future of the Huckleberry pack is highly uncertain. The young pups are motherless and the pack has no matriarch - by allowing the kill order to remain in effect, WDFW is sealing the fate of the pack."
    -- Defenders of Wildlife

    August 20, 2014

    Ferguson, FERGUSON, FeRgUsOn, ferGUSon, FERGUson, fErGuSoN, Ferguson, FERGUSON, FeRgUsOn, ferGUSon, FERGUson, fErGuSoN, Ferguson, FERGUSON, FeRgUsOn, ferGUSon, FERGUson, fErGuSoN, Ferguson, FERGUSON, FeRgUsOn, ferGUSon, FERGUson, fErGuSoN, Ferguson, FERGUSON, FeRgUsOn, ferGUSon, FERGUson, fErGuSoN, Ferguson, FERGUSON, FeRgUsOn, ferGUSon, FERGUson, fErGuSoN, ????????????????

    August 15, 2014

    Well, it's the middle of August and Congress has been on a well-deserved leave. Can't you just feel the disruption, the slowdown, the loss of leadership? If they were to stay on leave permanently, would anyone notice? The original reason for an August vacation was the intolerable late summer heat in Washington, DC. But now, in the golden age of air-conditioners, why is that necessary? Tradition. If nothing else, Congress rigidly and faithfully upholds traditions.

    For example, in 1953 the CIA orchestrated the overthrow of the democratically-elected government of Iran, its first. It was a test run, a field experiment to work out the bugs and the unforseen. From it, an actual user's manual was derived, later refined and tweeked to take into account all possible scenarios and contingencies. That original coup d'etat was masterfully accomplished, and, after the first failure, an experiment gone bad, set the model for all to follow, establishing the tradition of coups.

    King Reagan concocted the trickle-down economic joke that the Republican party embraced as a bona-fide tradition, a keystone of their political philosophy. Through the 80's and 90's production of products in America increased several fold while wages and benefits remained constant. The increased profits were gobbled up and distributed to the upper eschelon and did not manage to trickle down to the workers responsible for the increase. Trickling down was bullshit from the beginning, and in the circles I've traveled, refers to being pissed on.

    We can only hope that the month goes by quickly so Congress can return to its three-day-a-week job of saying no and generally refusing to do anything to help the country and its citizens. After months of anal retention, a relatively new and perversely adhered to tradition of the Republican Party, they certainly need the break.

    August 12, 2014

    I recall after the World Trade Center attacks, some spokesman for Al-Qaida anticipated a coup taking place in the United States. I remember how truly shocked I felt at that. The very idea. America is a highly complex, interwoven social, cultural, and political structure. For ignorant insulated ragheads to believe that it would disintegrate into an amorphous bowl of jelly as a result of those attacks demonstrates their lack of knowledge about the history of the US--Pearl Harbor, anyone?--and seriously underestimates the strength, resolve, and determination of the American people to stand up for our country and way of life. And why the hell would there be a coup in the first place and by whom?

    This told me far more about those countries, their people and how they think than anything else I've come across. In their world it's possible or even likely that a coup would be inspired from a proportionate attack by some terrorist group. They don't get it and never will. They don't belong to a country and so the country they call home doesn't belong to them. None of the 22 members of the Arab League is free or democratic. Kings, princes, nobles run the land and own the oil to do with as they wish, however wasteful. As long as they remain enslaved by their own political and sectarian systems, putting allegiance to tribe and religious group above that of their home country as a nation state, as long as they adamantly refuse to form an integrated society working with all its faults for the good of the whole, nothing will ever change. Never.

    Review of Popular TV Shows:

      Mostly twenty-somethings pretending to be high school students involved in supernatural activities and events.

      Buffy the Vampire Slayer:
      Mostly twenty-somethings pretending to be high school students involved in supernatural activities and events.

      Royal Pains:
      Does anyone really care if the top one percent of the country living or summering in the Hamptons develops tennis elbow or gout or almost drowns in his pool after drinking too much champaigne?

    July 25, 2014

    Does anyone remember the communications officer for Sadaam Hussein? When we invaded Iraq and were in downtown Bagdhad with troops and tanks practically outside his front door, this guy was giving press talks telling people how badly the Iraqui military was beating the Americans. It was surreal and insane and a little pathetic at the same time. Well, that's who comes to mind whenever I hear or read about something John Boehner said.

    All kidding aside, I find it extremely disturbing to realize that Boehner, as the Speaker of the House, is third in line to run the country. My God. Please Lord, if you have any mercy left in your hearts for us overbearing and self-destructive Americans, please keep the president and vice-president safe and healthy. Please?

    June 12, 2014

    Just listening to John Boehner's warning of danger over the Bergdahl trade--traditional Republican scare tactics. "Releasing those five detainees has put every American at risk."

    Really? What about closer to home, nutjob? If you're so intersted in keeping Americans free from random danger and threats, try cleaning up the streets in New York, Chicago, LA, and, oh, here's one: why not do something serious about gun control? Why not do something about a Veterans Aaffairs system that's been clearly busted for decades and is responsible for the unnecessary deaths of men and women who've put their lives on the line in wars we should've been done with long ago? There's lots you and your obstructionist cohorts can do to alleviate danger to Americans. I don't see how sending angry men--and I would be too--back home halfway around the world even begins to compare with mass killings and ineffectual gun laws. Do something about helping people out of poverty so they won't have to resort to crime to get by and support their families. Do something positive, for Christ's sake, and get off this opportunistic bashing of the president. You just make yourselves look like racist fools and hate mongers, trying to scare people about boogeymen from the Far East when there's plenty right here at home. I'll tell you what, I grew up on the streets of Philadelphia, and the only thing that scares me in this country is you people, the staunchly resistant and anal-retentive Republican slice of the Congress. And the Democrats, forever timid and afraid to upset an imagined populace, demonstrate cowardice in their lack of energetic support of the president. All you people should be ashamed of yourselves, but I think you're beyond the reach of such provincial emotions.

    John Boehner Flat Out Lies With Claim Obama Put American Lives at Risk With Bergdahl Swap

    Boehner: Bowe Bergdahl Swap Could Put Americans in Jeopardy | The Wall Street Journal

    Idaho's orgy of death continues unabated with its War on Wolves. Check out this infographic from Defenders of Wildlife:

    War on Wolves Infographic

    June 6, 2014

    The difference between real philosophers like Hoffer, Emerson, and Sartre and those with merely an intelectual grasp of freedom is street sense. That's the dimension that allows for its full expression. One must feel comfortable and at home in the world. Openness connecting as self and acceptance of doing nothing are not givens.

    You have to own yourself.

    Without the visceral element of eros, without the physical medium of consciousness, there can be no true understanding of freedom.

    May 28, 2014

    "Monarch butterflies have habitat where you wouldn't expect it -- for instance, agricultural fields across the Midwest. But this habitat is in danger of being lost to a deadly new herbicide.

    "The EPA is planning to approve a Dow Company herbicide that contains glyphosate, the active chemical in Roundup, and 2,4-D, a major component of the infamous Agent Orange toxin used in the Vietnam War. Wildlife habitat, plants and crops that haven't been genetically engineered to withstand this dangerous cocktail will be harmed.

    "The increase in genetically engineered crops and herbicides in recent years has already reduced milkweed populations by 51 percent, and monarch populations have plummeted by 81 percent.

    "The use of 2,4-D will also hurt threatened species like California red-legged frogs, Alameda whipsnakes and several types of salmon by destroying plants where these species live."
    --- Center for Biological Diversity

    "Americans have a special bond with horses. They helped build our nation, and they’re not raised to be food because we don’t eat them. So how is it that we could allow more than 150,000 U.S. horses to be sent abroad to slaughter every year?

    "Make no mistake—any horse can wind up at a slaughterhouse: the patient Quarter Horse, the sleek Thoroughbred, the gorgeous Clydesdale. Every single horse in America is vulnerable—and just one bad sale away from the butcher’s knife.

    "The ASPCA is fighting this grisly industry on all fronts, but we can’t do it without your help. Our immediate task is to block the resumption of U.S. horse slaughter. We made great progress last Thursday, when language to renew the ban on using tax dollars to fund horse meat inspections cleared its first hurdle by passing the Senate Appropriations Committee. But there’s more work to do. The ASPCA is pushing for passage of the SAFE Act, a bill that will ban horse slaughter in all 50 states as well as ban export of our horses to other countries for slaughter."
    --- Keep Horses Off the Killing Floor

    May 26, 2014

    Demagogue: A leader who obtains power by means of impassioned appeals to the emotions and prejudices of the populace.

    Sound like anyone you know? Maybe lots of someones. Fear mongering has become tools of the trade for Republicans these days. What contempt they have for the American people.

    May 22, 2014

    I just watched this on Free Speech TV:

  • "Call Of Life: Facing the Mass Extinction" | Watch Free Documentary Online - 80 minutes | Culture Unplugged
    "If current trends continue, scientists warn that within a few decades at least HALF of all plant and animal species on Earth will disappear forever. “Call of Life: Facing the Mass Extinction” is the first feature documentary to investigate the growing threat to Earth’s life support systems from this unprecedented loss of biodiversity."

    Check it out.

    "A new GOP push to dramatically cut federal spending for summer school lunch programs comes after years of right-wing media misinformation about and attacks against funding for school lunch programs."

    GOP Push To Cut School Lunch Funding Echoes Years Of Conservative Media Attacks
    May 21, 2014 - Media Matters for America

    May 14, 2014

    The great State of Idaho is at it again:

    "Ravens are among the most intelligent species on this planet. They are also among the only creatures who engage in play for the sheer joy of it. Juvenile ravens have been known to steal and cache shiny objects and slide down snowbanks on their backs. They have even been observed to make their own toys and to engage in games with other species. Ravens are also a federally protected species, yet the state of Idaho is planning on killing at least 4,000 of them over the next two years.

    "The ravens are being culled in the name of conserving another species, the greater sage-grouse. Ravens are an opportunistic species and are known to occasionally prey on grouse eggs and chicks, yet predation ranks low on the list of threats to their survival. The greatest threat to the birds by far is loss of habitat, mostly due to residential building and energy development. Increased predation is the direct result of loss of ground cover and suitable habitat for sage-grouse nesting, yet while the ravens are sentenced to death for engaging in their natural behavior little is being done to restrict development and save grouses’ native brushlands.

    "The sage-grouse is currently on a conservation wait list. Federal officials will decide next year whether or not to officially list the bird as threatened. As a threatened species the grouse would be subject to federal protection, including limiting development on critical habitat. Because of this states like Idaho that have large historic populations of sage-grouse are rushing to increase their numbers in an attempt to limit federal regulation on their public lands. This is an irresponsible and misguided fix to a complex, fundamentally human problem."
    --- Stop Wildlife Officials' Senseless Raven Killing

    April 25, 2014

    I would like to draw your attention to the following polls. The question asked was: "Do you approve or disapprove of the job the Republicans in Congress are doing in office?" Here are the results.

    And according to a Gallup poll: No Improvement for Congress' Job Approval Rating | April 10, 2014

    In the movie Elysium, with Matt Damon and Jodie Foster, the basic theme was that only the wealthy could afford state-of-the-art medical care because only they were considered citizens. Sounds very much like how Republicans want it to be which would be the case without the Affordable Care Act.

    I don't know how many times I've seen the positively brilliant movie Avatar. Every time I watch it some new details are revealed. James Cameron created his very own category, a breathtaking and beautiful experiencce. The content tends to distract, necessarily, from the context which is mentioned briefly and only at the very beginning. Backed by an aggressive military, some obscure corporation seeking the improbably-named and prophetic mineral unobtainium is running the show, making the final decisions, launching the invasion. The movie is futuristic as is Elysium; however, where that movie is clearly a class allegory, Avatar tells the story of native Americans and their plight at the hands of invading Europeans seeking gold and land. But the point I'm trying to make is this: We have a corporation backed by mercenaries invading another planet with the intention of taking it over no matter the cost to life, but no mention of any Earth-side government.

    In fact, it may not be too much of a stretch to imagine Pandora to be Iraq, unobtainium to be oil, and the corporation to be that of the oil industry. And who has backed them? Digressing somewhat, that's where the comparison ends, though. I don't believe the Iraquis are in touch with much of nature as native Americans are or at least were. People who feel close to, if not one with, the Earth and the natural order are far more tolerant--although not so much towards invaders--than those who believe in abstract notions of God. And because of the abstract character of their God, Iraquis are fragmented in their beliefs based on trivial differences. Moreover, it doesn't seem that the sanctity of life is very high on the Islamic agenda.

    And what about the logging and mineral companies invading tribal lands and destroying villages and wild habitat in South America? And what about the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge? What about human beings ruthlessly going after whatever they feel they can't do without, must have, at the cost of some other people's lives and ways of life? What about the Chinese government uprooting tens of thousands of people from their ancestral villages and homes in order to build a dam? What about all this shit?

    Would an alien race on a research anthropological tour of this sector of the galaxy even begin to consider contacting us? Don't you think they'd be wary, given our predilections, lest we visit their planet?

    April 25, 2014

    Night of the Living Dead
    "A disturbing ritual in Holley, New York has surfaced in the media. Residents take part in an annual “Squirrel Slam,” a fundraiser in which citizens kill as many squirrels as they can in order to “benefit” the local fire department. As if this isn’t bizarre and gruesome enough, children are encouraged to take part and awards are given to those who kill the most squirrels. Fortunately, by supporting a bill that would ban senseless killing contests, we can help stop the event.

    "Residents in the town of Holley take pride in squirrel hunting. One image shows children carrying the dead animals down the street, while adults stand by idly. Since squirrels are said to be a vital asset to forest regeneration, their removal would upset the local ecosystem and harm the growth of at least 10 species of trees. Estimates suggest that the Holley Squirrel Slam results in the death of over 2000 squirrels per year, thus deliberately damaging the environment.

    "The animal rights organization Friends of Animals, along with state senator Tony Avella, who proposed the bill, are hoping to stop animal killing contests across the state of New York. Other senators have already jumped on board with the idea that senseless killing and destruction of wildlife is unacceptable."
    -- End Gruesome Squirrel Slaughter

    April 23, 2014

    "The Thai Police have recently made a gruesome discovery in the forest alongside the Laos border. They uncovered hundreds upon hundreds of dog pelts in a pile next to dog bones. This horrific discovery sheds light on how big the dog leather trade really is. Many people are familiar with the dog meat trade, however, the dog leather industry may be just as shocking.

    "Dog leather is used by factories to make everything from drums to golf gloves. Golf glove manufacturers especially value the skin from male dog testicles because the skin from that area has a softer quality. The demand for dog pelts appallingly works hand in hand with the dog meat trade. Many dog smugglers are drawn to Thailand due to its large population of stray dogs. Smugglers continue to sneak dog parts across the border from Thailand and Laos. If their attempts are successful, it is most likely that the dog pelts and meat would be transported to Vietnam or China, where the demand for dog parts is particularly strong.

    "The entire ordeal for these dogs is extremely cruel from beginning to end. Usually the dogs would be skinned alive and have to endure an excruciating amount of pain before they die. It is an absolutely cruel and horrendous industry and it must be stopped as soon as possible. Sign this petition and urge the Prime Minister of Thailand to crack down on the smuggling and trade of dog parts."
    -- Stop Killing Dogs for Leather in Thailand

    April 21, 2014

    Standing, left to right: Associate Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Samuel Alito.
    Seated, left to right: Associate Justices , Anthony M. Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice John Roberts,
    Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and David H. Souter

    "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." -- Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence

    April 20, 2014

    "The Copenhagen Zoo in Denmark sparked anger all over the world in February when officials killed a healthy 18-month old giraffe. As if that didn’t cause enough outrage, according to the New York Times, the zoo decided to euthanize four more animals in April. This time they killed four healthy lions to clear some space for a new male lion. The zoo’s decision caused a huge public backlash with some even calling Copenhagen Zoo officials “murderers.” The zoo defended the killing of the four lions by saying that they wanted to save genetic purity of the animals in their facilities. They were afraid that the new male lion would prey on the cubs and breed with one of the female lions that were his offspring, which would cause inbreeding."
    -- Condemn Zoo for Killing Four Lions | Animal Petitions

    "Three conservation groups recently initiated a lawsuit against the governor of Idaho and other state officials to halt trapping that illegally kills one of the rarest cats in the United States, the Canada lynx. According to The Center for Biological Diversity, the state of Idaho is enabling Endangered Species Act violations by permitting trapping that leads to incidental killing of lynx. Urge the Idaho Department of Fish and Game to develop a conservation plan that would help maintain the survival of these beautiful, threatened animals.

    "Under the Endangered Species Act, trapping of lynx is illegal, even if the animal is released alive. Any agency that permits trapping is liable under the Act. Trapping permitted by the state of Idaho is pushing these animals toward extinction, which is a clear violation of the Act.

    "The Canada lynx is a threatened species that numbers as few as one hundred in the state of Idaho. Recreational trapping poses great risk for the lynx living there. Although the intentional trapping of lynx is not permitted under Idaho law, increases in trapping licenses and fur prices, especially for bobcat, have resulted in incidental trapping of lynx. In the past two years, at least three lynx have been unintentionally caught by bobcat trappers."
    -- Save Rare Lynx from Illegal Trapping | Animal Petitions

    "Kentucky State Representative Joni Jenkins sponsored a bill in January called House Bill 222, with the intent to set strict standards for the use of euthanasia in animal shelters. Unfortunately, when the bill entered committee in the State Senate, things went awry. Language was added to the bill that would restrict or even ban animal rights advocates from entering farms and slaughterhouses to record animal abuse.

    "Such legislation bans the use of hidden cameras to film abuses carried out on factory farms, and is a direct attack on animal rights organizations trying to stop and prevent animal rights violations. Bills including language like this are often referred to as “ag-gag bills.” The addition of such a provision comes on the heels of many alleged instances of animal cruelty on Kentucky family farms, many reported here on ForceChange. Call on the Kentucky Senate to remove the “ag-gag” provision of the bill, and restore this important piece of legislation to Representative Jenkin’s original intention of helping animals. Senator Paul Hornback, who leads the Kentucky Senate Agricultural Committee, has the power to remove all “ag-gag” language in this bill; call on him to do so today.

    "The ability of animal rights groups to investigate factory farming operations and slaughter houses is crucial to preventing animal abuse. In the last few years, undercover operations have exposed animal cruelty in Kentucky and many other states time and time again. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals pointed out in a recent statement that while it is deplorable that big agribusiness is edging its way into legislation at all, it is especially tragic in the case of House Bill 222, which was originally meant to protect animals. The Kentucky Farm Bureau, a lobbyist group that represents not only small family farms but also large factory farm operations, unsurprisingly supports the bill."
    -- Stop Law Meant to Keep Animal Abuse in the Dark | Animal Petitions

    April 19, 2014

    Four Horsemen Of The Apocalypse

    John Boehner, Ted Cruz, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul

    April 18, 2014

    It not only depends on what news outlet you listen to, it depends on how closely you listen, the details. On the Jon Stewart show a representative of the State Department was being interviewed in one of their typically derisive question and answer segments. He stated at one point that President Putin was concerned that "neo-nazi terrorists were going to (oppress) ethnic Russians." It was intended to be absurd, of course, as we Americans are conditioned to believe that anything our former cold-war enemy says is nonsense and just pretense to justify military involvement in order to keep the country--Ukraine plus Crimea--from breaking away completely from Russian influence. But later on in the day during the David Pakman show on Free Speech TV the story came out that Jews in the town of Donetsk in eastern Ukraine are being told to "register" with the pro-Russian militants who have taken over a government office. How taking over an office puts them in charge of the country, or anything, for that matter, and in a position to dictate to any particular group is a testament to the fragmented and incoherent nature of Ukraine's current status. Sounds like intimidation, extortion and robbery by an armed gang of petty thugs--a shakedown--just like in Germany at the onset of the Nazi movement, only not so organized.

      "Jews emerging from a synagogue say they were handed leaflets that ordered the city's Jews to provide a list of property they own and pay a registration fee "or else have their citizenship revoked, face deportation and see their assets confiscated," reported Ynet News, Israel's largest news website, and Ukraine's Donbass news agency."
      --- Leaflet Tells Jews to Register in East Ukraine | April 17, 2014 - USA Today

    At the bottom of this article was:

      "Michael Salberg, director of the international affairs at the New York City-based Anti-Defamation League, said it's unclear whether the leaflets were issued by the pro-Russian leadership or a splinter group operating within the pro-Russian camp.

      "But he said the Russian side has used the specter of anti-Semitism in a cynical manner. Russia and its allies in Ukraine have issued multiple stories about the threat posed to Jews by Ukraine's new pro-Western government in Kiev, Salberg said."

    The emphasis is mine. Understand that Salsberg's point of view is as the spokeman for the Anti-Defamation League home-based in the U.S. of A.. Nonetheless, the point I'm trying to make is that, except for the allegation by western media sources that the people threatening the "ethnic group"--Jews--are Pro-Russian militants wanting Ukraine to be part of Russia, what Putin purportedly said turns out to be correct. That is, if we can believe what USA Today and other news media tell us insofar as their designation of just who these people are and what they represent--their agenda--as opposed to Putin's, their anti-Semitic actions are the same. The question then comes down to: whose side are they actually on? Perhaps they're just on their own side, like the Taliban, which would make President Putin's observation the more accurate one.

    Ultimately, what is really going on there and who the main actors are and what they want has been so terribly muddled by global media through its divergent interests and perspectives, its slants and cultural biases, and by the obtuseness of the usual suspects in Congress whose knee-jerk and typical response to such provocations is to shoot first and clarify later, that the true state of affairs may never surface. The end result of such confusion is that someone attacks someone else in an effort to put a lid on the whole mess in the name of imposing order and justice, thereby usurping control. All that's needed is a rationale, an excuse, a trigger, even if the aggressor has to fabricate one out of thin air. We Americans are no strangers to that.

    April 14, 2014

    Republican War On Women
    The Republicans in Congress and their Governor cohorts and city councils around the country have been working overtime to dismantle and undermine Roe v Wade; that should come as no news to anyone paying attention. Restrictions of the most ridiculous nature have been devised by these perverted, misogynistic assholes. In Texas they passed an ordinance or statute that places a minimal square footage on abortion clinics for reasons too obscure and clearly bogus to repeat. None of the clinics are able to comply, of course, the required footage was researched, so now they're all closed. Let me point out that these clinics don't just perform abortions, they also supply planned parenthood, contraceptive, and gynecological services to those unable to afford them.

    They haven't focused soley on reproductive rights, a bill known as the IVAWA--International Violence Against Women Act--is being reintroduced to the House for the fourth time. The GOP has blocked it on its last three incarnations.

      "I-VAWA would make preventative measures against gender-based violence a permanent addition to U.S. foreign policy. It would also seek to solidify and uniform research and reporting standards; strengthen prevention and response to violence; and nurture effective local organizations offering programs and services to women in matters of health, law, education, and other issues." -- Nina Strochlic - The Daily Beast

      “It’s a Republican-held Congress and they’re dead set on shooting down anything we introduce,” says Sabrina Singh, the Congresswoman’s (Rep. Jan Schakowsky, a Democrat representing Illinois’s 9th district who sponsored the bill last Fall) communications director. According to it has a one percent chance of being enacted.

    I feel like I'm on a boat that's slowly and jerkily being pushed back by the tide and wind, lots of wind. This right-wing almost fascist fervor and attitude of Republicans is nothing short of startling. They don't even try to hide with cleverness their determination to revoke womens rights and will to self-determination. Will the right to vote be next? Put forward by some southern reactionary as a means to curtail all possible threats from the left? The Voting Rights Act has already been seriously tampered with all through the south, so why not?

    What I'm hoping for is what I refer to as "the rubberband effect." I've seen it happen in other social contexts. Easy victories in the beginning lead to larger, more arrogant steps, assertions. False confidence builds inspiring daring leaps of aspiration when suddenly--one goes too far, the limb breaks, the baloon pops, the rubberband snaps, kaplow, right in the kisser.

    It's coming, the backlash, wait and see.

    April 10, 2014

    Idaho, Land of the Dead
    Rich Americans fly to Africa to kill animals for the hell of it, to brag about--trophy hunters. We love it, it's in our genes, our heritage, the way we think. America is easily the most kill-crazy country in the world, and no state more exemplifies that than Idaho. Forget potatoes, it's kill wolves, all of them, adults, cubs, pregnant mothers, allll of them. The blood lust is upon them. No holds or methods are barred, shooting with assault rifles from helicopters, trapping, snaring, then shooting, poisoning, blowing up, whatever, they have the blessing of the government backing them up, all hell is breaking loose.

    Goodbye wolves, you had your chance, we have to protect our livestock, even us folks what ain't got none, we're too stupid, selfish, and sociopathic to come up with another strategy, we're too dumb to figure out how to cooperate with wild animals, it hurts our brain, it's easier to just kill 'em. We need to boost the elk and deer populations for our sportsmen, there simply is not enough to go around. They're bad shots so they need lots of targets. It ain't like anybody eats wolf meat, you understand, no humans leastwise, it's not like we need to kill ya' to survive, no, it's all just for fun, git it?

    Now get this: The Earth is our planet, ours, you see, and we intend to keep it that way even if we have to kill every last one of you sons of bitches!

    "The feds just released the latest wolf kill numbers, and the news is heartbreaking: 1,131 wolves killed in Idaho since federal protection was removed in 2011. The state's population has plummeted by 42 percent since then. Otter's goal is to wipe out most wolves, until the entire state has only 10 packs left.

    "The state's wolf population is in sharp decline for the first time since wolf-recovery efforts began in the 1980s.

    "And it's going to get much, much worse if we don't stop Governor Butch Otter's atrocious plan to radically ramp up the killing.

    "Idaho has wiped out half its breeding wolf packs in just two years, leaving only 20 now. Otter has pledged to wipe out another five packs and bring the state's total population down to a mere 150 animals.

    "To pay for the slaughter he's taking $400,000 of taxpayer money and funneling it into his handpicked Wolf Depredation Control Board's funding. He's taken wolf management away from the state wildlife agency. He's expanded hunting areas and times, making killing a year-round sport in the northern half. And now he wants to give the livestock industry free rein to kill wolves whenever they want.

    "And if those few remaining packs successfully raise families and grow? Otter's "wolf depredation control board" will spend taxpayer money on helicopters, guns, traps and sharpshooters to kill them and if Otter gets his way, there will be so few gray wolves left that the species will be threatened with extinction again."
    -- Center for Biological Diversity

    "Idaho has gone too far with their endless assaults on wolves.

    "Less than five years after losing federal protection, it is clearer than ever that the state refuses to manage its wolf population responsibly.

    "That’s why today, Defenders of Wildlife officially requested that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) immediately initiate a status review of wolves in the Northern Rockies and examine the relentless threats that this species has encountered since being stripped of Endangered Species Act protection back in 2011.

    "Instead of managing their wolves like other wildlife, the state of Idaho has declared war on them.

    "In the less than three years since Congress stripped Idaho’s wolves of protection, the state has:

    • Used aerial gunning to wipe out entire packs, including those on national forest lands, to artificially boost elk populations;

    • Allowed hunting of wolves every day of the year;

    • Doubled the number of wolves that could be trapped or snared from five to ten;

    • Sent a professional trapper to eliminate two packs of wolves in a federal wilderness area;

    • Has proposed killing 60 percent of the remaining wolves in the Frank Church Wilderness; and

    • Recently passed HB470 into law setting aside an annual amount of $400,000 for the sole purpose of killing as many wolves as possible.

    "The Governor of Idaho has made no secret of his intention to reduce the state's wolf population to 150 animals or less – which would require initially killing more than 450 wolves and their young as more are born."
    -- Defenders of Wildlife

    Nearby where I live is a small lake. A handful of locals use it in the summer to wade and swim in. Last year they complained, some of them, about the goose droppings in the water, seemed it bothered their otherwise perfect enjoyment. Consequently, the Fish and Game authorities went there and killed all the geese, 60 of them.

    Up the road from me lived a beaver and his family. As beavers do, they constructed a dam and built a house in the middle of the pond that resulted. It rains a lot here in the spring. After an especially long downpour that lasted several days, the pond flooded over and covered the roadway, not much, just an inch perhaps. The people who lived up that way, not many to be sure as a mile further is the entrance to the Olympic National Forest, complained about it. They could've waited until the sun came out and the water subsided, it wasn't going to be a permanent fixture and they were never in any danger of having their vehicles washed off the road. Nonetheless, the authorities came out and killed the beaver family--male, female and two cubs I saw on one occasion--and broke up the dam.

    This is the American way, how we deal with wildlife. Someone complains or might complain or is temporarily inconvenienced and the culpable creatures are killed fortwith; no tolerance or attempt to work out some strategy that's mutually beneficial is considered. And the authorities, Fish and Game or Fish and Wildlife, are very obliging and quick to respond the only way they know how.

    April 9, 2014

    "Rep. Paul Ryan ”the Republicans' self-appointed policy wonk” is out with a new plan to cut ... well, pretty much everything: Head Start, Medicaid, food stamps, low-income housing, energy assistance, job training, education, veterans programs ... basically finding every way possible to cut from programs that help hardworking Americans in order to give more money to special interests.

    "Just one problem, though. He cherry-picked data from various academic and governmental studies to make his numbers work and the economists whose work he's misrepresenting are not happy about it.

    "Simply put: Paul Ryan is a fraud who can't balance a spreadsheet."
    -- The Daily Kos

    April 8, 2014

    "Oil companies are continuing to seek permits that would allow them to explore for oil in Africa's oldest national park, Virunga. This national park is also the home range of more than half of the world's mountain gorillas, a critically endangered species whose survival would be seriously threatened if it were to lose a large portion of its habitat. Despite the fact that Virunga is a protected UNESCO World Heritage Site, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has considered revoking the national park's protected status, therefore becoming "degazetted"ť and making it legal for oil companies to drill in the area.

    "Not only is Virunga National Park home to a majority of the mountain gorillas currently living in the wild, but it is also the home of several other endangered species including chimpanzees, forest elephants, and hippos. The incredibly rare forest giraffe, Okapi, resides in Virunga National Park exclusively. Allowing oil companies to search and drill for oil in this beautiful landscape would further threaten the survival of these rare creatures.

    "By signing this petition, you will be asking U.S. government officials to urge the DRC government to abandon its plans to degazette Virunga National Park to allow oil development, revoke all previously issued permits to explore for oil in the park, and permanently declare all of DRC's protected areas and national parks off-limits to oil companies."
    -- Save National Park from Oil Drilling

    When Big Oil says jump, these corrupt governments hold out their hands and ask, "How high?"

    April 5, 2014

    As we enter the Golden Age of Corporate Oligarchy (Corporatocracy), let's take a moment to look back at how it came to be.

    President Eisenhower warned of the Military Industrial Complex, but no one took heed. Through the seventies and especially the eighties multinational corporations, led by Big Oil, invested heavily in every developing country in the world, making deals with the ruling governments. They superceded restrictions placed on mere sovereign nation-states and had the backing of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Asian Development Fund. These institutions offered large sums of money to countries in desperate need with conditions that demanded the elimination of local village and community access to clean water and agricultural necessities--seeds, fertilizer, pesticides, and herbicides--in compliance with the business interests of those multinationals concerned.

    In general, today the peoples of these countries have thus become dependent, to a great extent, for their survival on the multinationals who, in a very real sense, exert a controling influence on the cultures of these societies, undermining their previously traditional sustainable and independent life-supporting practices.

    Any and all pretense to legitimate democracies, military juntas, communist dictatorships, and local political regimes has been supplanted by an entrenched infrastructure regulated by the complex of corporate banking interests in collusion with and supported by a corrupt governing body.

    Welcome to the New World Order.

      1. A body that is granted a charter recognizing it as a separate legal entity having its own rights, privileges, and liabilities distinct from those of its members.

      2. (Law) a group of people authorized by law to act as a legal personality and having its own powers, duties, and liabilities.

    Recently--April 15--the following report/analysis came across my desk so to speak:

    Two documentaries that will shed more light on the global situation are:

    • "The World According to Monsanto" | 108 minutes - Top Documentary Films
      "There's nothing they are leaving untouched: the mustard, the okra, the bringe oil, the rice, the cauliflower. Once they have established the norm: that seed can be owned as their property, royalties can be collected. We will depend on them for every seed we grow of every crop we grow. If they control seed, they control food, they know it – it's strategic. It's more powerful than bombs. It's more powerful than guns.

      "This is the best way to control the populations of the world.

      "Thanks to these intimate links between Monsanto and government agencies, the US adopted GE foods and crops without proper testing, without consumer labeling and in spite of serious questions hanging over their safety. Not coincidentally, Monsanto supplies 90 percent of the GE seeds used by the US market."

    • Watch Free Online -- "Flow: For Love of Water" | 93 minutes - Top Documentary Films
      "Irena Salina's award-winning documentary investigation into what experts label the most important political and environmental issue of the 21st Century - The World Water Crisis. Salina builds a case against the growing privatization of the world's dwindling fresh water supply with an unflinching focus on politics, pollution, human rights, and the emergence of a domineering world water cartel."

    April 4, 2014

  • Move to Amend
    On January 21, 2010, with its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons, entitled by the U.S. Constitution to buy elections and run our government. Human beings are people; corporations are legal fictions.
    • Recommended Documentaries
      "We suggest the following films as great educational resources on corporate power (many additional films are also listed on the website Films for Action)." Their tag line is: Films For Action Presents: The Top 100 Documentaries Inspiring the Shift to a Sustainable Paradigm

  • Videos | Move to Amend

  • Corrosive Influence of Big Money | Occupy Natick
    Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr. said, “Today, more than ever, it is critical for American citizens to understand the difference between the free-market capitalism that made our country great and the corporate cronyism that is now corrupting our political process, strangling democracy and devouring our national treasures."

  • CPI: Center for Public Integrity | Investigative Journalism
    A non-profit public interest group based in Washington, D.C.

  • Campaign finance reform | Wikipedia

    "A recent undercover investigation by The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) has revealed that puppies are being tortured and killed for vaccine research at MSD Animal Health, which is owned by the pharmaceutical company Merck, Sharp and Dohme. Modern technologies have made this type of testing unnecessary. It is time to stop the senseless killing of animals.

    "During an eight-month period, a BUAV investigator, who was posing as an employee, witnessed 92 beagle puppies, 10 adult nursing female beagles, at least 15 kittens, and an unknown number of rabbits, calves, and chickens killed at the MSD Animal Health facility which is located in Cambridgeshire, England. Some of the puppies were as young as four weeks old when they were repeatedly injected with vaccines in the name of research. When they were deemed no longer useful, many of the adult dogs were killed without any attempt to find them a loving home.

    "The BUAV investigator captured disturbing video footage of puppies thrashing and squealing as they try to prevent being injected with a lethal does of medicine. After the puppies are killed, their small bodies are ripped open and their organs are examined. Shockingly, MSD Animal Health are not breaking any laws with their cruel research, but alternative techniques like cell bacteria analysis would provide ample information without killing innocent animals. BUAV’s spokeswoman Sarah Kite says, “We do not believe that the company or the wider research community are doing enough to use alternative approaches to animal testing in the development of animal vaccines.”"
    -- Stop Killing Puppies for Vaccine Testing

    April 3, 2014

    The Chariman of the House Budget Committee, Republican Paul Ryan, recently released his master plan for balancing the budget by 2024. His intention is to increase defense spending and cut corporate taxes, even though most corporations don't pay what they owe now and some don't pay anything, subsidized as they are by federal money, cut Medicare, food stamps, college loans, and repeal the Affordable Care Act as a sideshow, everything and anything that helps those most vulnerable in today's economy. He is a mouth-piece for the wealthy, corporate interests, and the military-industrial complex and doesn't even try to hide it. And he's just the spokeman for that mentality, for the Republican war on poor people.

    And yet, and yet, those very same people who are and would be most affected by entitlement and program cuts still get out there and vote for them. It's mindboggling. Could it be some variant on the Stockholm Syndrome? Could they be under some kind of spell? Even though they're made to feel inferior and accused of being lazy and unamerican, they still vote those bastards into office. If some Republican congressman says he's a Christian opposed to gay marriage and for gun rights, that's enough. Issues close to the heart of evangelists, homophobes, and second amendment fanatics are so important that being knocked into the mud and held there while simultaneously raising up the rich and powerful is a small price to pay if it means voting those people into office who will work tirelessly to support what real America is all about, misunderstood and opposite to the truth as that may be. And it's not as though they, the politicians, are being clandestine about it. No, they're far too arrogant and sure of the gullibility and ignorance of their audience who, as a matter of pride, accept gross inequities and being the victims of corporate and financial-market fraud as God's will and a cross to bear that will be rewarded in heaven.

    Regardless of what the Party wants to do and has done to make their lives more difficult if not impossible, having the right core value attributes appears to be sufficient to warrant their vote. What insanity. How unbeleivable. The right-wing fascist movement in Germany in the '30s used the same kind of tactics, began with the same sort of mentality, easily manipulated with lies and propaganda. It's a human thing, and we the people of democratic freedoms are not immune.
    -- Ryan's Budget Would Cut 5 Trillion in Spending Over a Decade | April 1, 2014 - New York Times

    "Siberian Tigers are the rarest breed of tiger on our planet and right now illegal logging is putting their future in jeopardy. Only 400 to 500 Siberian tigers are left in the wild, living throughout the vast forests of the Russian Far East, the only place they call home and the origin of millions of square feet of illegally logged hardwoods used right here, in the United States. Not only does illegal logging damage the environment, it disrupts our climate, hurts communities, and threatens American jobs.

    "A landmark law called the Lacey Act helps the United States combat trafficking in illegal wood products and penalizes those who import illegally harvested wood products and wildlife. It is imperative that the Lacey Act continue to be enforced and strengthened."
    -- Save Wildlife and their Habitats from Deforestation! -- Protect the Lacey Act

    April 2, 2014

    "Two Texas teenagers were recently arrested after they admitted kidnapping, skinning and murdering neighborhood pets. Local police had been investigating the sudden disappearance of an eight-year-old rescue dog named Camo after rumors began spreading that the beloved pet had been kidnapped by cult members for a satanic ritual. Authorities eventually found Camo dead, hanging from a tree. The poor animal had been skinned and was reportedly missing several internal organs. Investigators believe that Camo endured severe abuse and torture before he was likely sacrificed in a cult-style manner.

    "The teenagers, 17-year-old Mark Ainsworth and 18-year-old Delaney Walters, reportedly admitted to kidnapping Camo and killing him during their satanic ritual. They also admitted to stealing, torturing and murdering a cat and three kittens. After their confessions, police also discovered evidence of these disgusting crimes, as Ainsworth and Walters took photos and videos throughout their cruel rituals."
    -- Condemn Teens for Torturing and Murdering Neighborhood Pets | Animal Petitions

    "Right now, politicians in Alabama are considering the most extreme and restrictive abortion ban in the country. And if that wasn't bad enough, this bill, which would ban abortion at just six weeks of pregnancy, is just one part of a sweeping package of bills aimed at restricting a woman's personal medical decisions.

    "If it becomes law, the proposed six week ban would become the earliest and most extreme abortion ban in the country, with no exceptions for cases of rape and incest. If passed, this bill would essentially ban all abortions in the state of Alabama. Unfortunately, these politicians aren't the first to try it. Just last year a federal judge blocked a similar ban passed in North Dakota because it was blatantly unconstitutional. It's clear these attacks will not be stopping any time soon. It's important we show that we are watching and taking action."
    -- Pledge to Fight the Most Extreme Abortion Ban in the Country

    April 1, 2014

  • War on Voting Rights

  • Albuquerque Police Out of Control

    War on Wolves in Idaho
    "Idaho Governor Butch Otter just signed a death warrant for 500 more wolves. And he's going to divert $400,000 of taxpayer money to kill them. If Otter gets his way, there will be so few gray wolves left that the species will be threatened with extinction again.

    - He lengthened the regular hunting season in much of the state and made killing a year-round sport in the northern half.

    - He took wolf management away from the state wildlife agency and turned it over to a handpicked "wolf depredation control board" entirely made up of anti-wolf hunters and ranchers.

    "Idaho has already killed more than 970 wolves since federal protections were stripped away by rightwing congressmen in 2011. The state's population has plummeted by 42 percent since then. Otter's goal is to wipe out most wolves, until the entire state has only 10 packs left."
    -- Center for Biological Diversity

    The following are from Animal Petitions:

      "Tiger slaughters have been a problem in China for nearly a century, but over the last few years it has become a symbol of stature for wealthy businessmen to not only have tigers slaughtered for their meat and bones, but also to be able to witness the slaughter as a form of entertainment.

      "More than ten tigers have been killed in the last five years solely for the purpose of entertaining officials and wealthy business people who gather to watch in order to show off their social stature. These events are described as “visual feasts.” Police in the city of Zhanjiang recently discovered a freshly slaughtered tiger and other tiger products in a raid. A video taken two years ago shows a tiger in a cage having an electrified mass forced into its mouth with stick. After being electrocuted for more than ten seconds, the tiger finally collapses."
      -- Stop Slaughtering Tigers for Entertainment

      "The worst case of animal abuse documented in the United States took place at an unlicensed slaughterhouse in Florida where drug dealer and owner, Raul Fernandez, shot, stabbed, beat and boiled animals alive — all for the sake of a profit.

      "Visited by undercover members of the Miami police and Animal Recovery Mission, the illegal, unlicensed slaughterhouse quickly transformed into a house of horrors as a cameraman inquired about purchasing a whole pig. Intrigued, a member of Fernandez’s staff set out to find the perfect hog, where the obscenities were filmed on a hidden camera. One butcher is caught shooting a wild boar in the head and dragging it 150 feet to its fate with a metal hook through its jaw. Another worker beats a screaming pig with a mallet before stabbing it. Lastly, a helpless goat has its neck sliced and blood drained while wooden slabs are attached to its legs in preparation for a dunk into a vat of boiling water."
      -- Reprimand Slaughterhouse for Atrocious Animal Abuse

      "An officer from the Filer Police Department in Idaho recently shot a dog to death at a young boy’s birthday party. According to news reports, Officer Tarek Hassani was called on duty to a home, based on reports that dogs were running loose around a neighborhood. The owner of the black labrador that was shot believed that the situation could have been handled differently, because his dog was not violent or aggressive. The officer shot the dog only yards away from the children’s party. He could have easily harmed not only the dog, but also the children nearby."
      -- Punish Police Officer for Shooting Dog

    March 31, 2014

      Excerpts from email:

      "The Exxon Valdez oil tanker spilled off the coast of Alaska 25 years ago this month, coating the waters and shores of Prince William Sound with nearly 11 million gallons of oil and killing hundreds of thousands of sea animals. The local killer whales, sea birds, and other wildlife populations are still seeking recovery from the toxic spill. Today we risk a disaster of equal or greater proportions as oil companies clamor to drill U.S. Arctic Ocean."
      -- 25 Years Later: Why Alaska Can't Afford Another Exxon Valdez

    In 1989 I was briefly involved with the cleanup effort. I was helping a guy I knew in Cordova, where I was living at the time--the spill killed my fishing season--out in the southwest sector of Prince William Sound around Latouche Island and Knight's Passage. We were babysitting an oil skimmer, no big deal for large sums of money. The currents at tide shifts are brutal in that area. They speed up when passing through the narrow channels separating islands. If your boat can't exceed 12 knots or so, you could find yourself in big trouble. Anyway, the work was a joke. Dozens of men spraying a ruined beach, hopelessly, the oil was sludge, once you got it on your fingers you had to use this citrous juice stuff to get it off. So imagine what it did to birds and otters. They'd clean one beach, move off, then later come back to the first beach. It was money thrown away for appearances sake. I remember one day, we were tied up next to the Cape Douglas, a 120 foot sludge container, when a man from Exxon came into the cabin on the Douglas where we were watching a movie and said to look busy because some News televison channel was going to fly over in a helicopter some time that day. It was all bullshit and after about a month, I quit to go herring tendering in the north Bering sea, the Togiak opener.

    The sludge on those beaches has never been even slightly removed, it's just buried by the relentless tidal comings and goings. I remember all the Orcas, Gray whales and countless dolphins that used to run beside the bow in their playfulness that once lived in the Sound and were exhilarating to see and be around. They all moved out after the spill along with the seals from Columbia Bay and up to 1994 when I left Cordova I never saw any or heard of anyone else seeing them again.

    Incidently, I recollect that Exxon made record profits that quarter; they passed the enormous cost of the cleanup and subsequent settlements on to the consumer.

      "Oceana has published a new report exposing nine of the dirtiest fisheries in the U.S. These fisheries combined throw away almost half of what they catch and are responsible for killing thousands of dolphins, whales, and sea turtles each year. Oceana is calling on the federal government to clean up these dirty fisheries to protect marine wildlife and reduce wasted catch.

      "The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has released their final Environmental Impact Statement on seismic airgun blasting, taking another step forward to releasing these blasts in the Atlantic. Oceana CEO Andy Sharpless and actress Kate Mara penned an editorial for the Huffington Post explaining how seismic airguns will harm marine wildlife and coastal economies."
      -- Seismic Airguns Threaten the Atlantic.

    March 29, 2014

    March 28, 2014

    The following are excerpts from some of the daily email I receive:

      "Animal advocates and lawmakers in New York are working to make sure barbaric wildlife killing contests like Palenville's Crow Down and Holley's Squirrel Slam never take place again. Opponents continue to raise concerns over the cruelty inherent in these contests and the dangerous, indifferent, attitudes they promote towards wildlife especially when it comes to what they teach children about the species we share our landscapes with. Species who are considered pests are often targeted in these contests, but the so-called hunters who continue to support them are completely ignoring not just the role their targets play in the environment, but their inherent value."

      "The National Rifle Association has mounted an outrageous campaign to torpedo President Obama’s nomination of an outstanding young doctor, Dr. Vivek Murthy, to be the next surgeon general of the United States because he has acknowledged in the past that gun violence is a public health problem. The sad part is, the NRA's campaign is causing some nervous Democrats whose votes may be needed for Senate confirmation to consider breaking with the president to bolster their own chances for re-election in states where the gun lobby is powerful. President Obama has the constitutional right to name his executive team. There is nothing in Dr. Murthy's background to suggest he would violate his pledge not to use the office to advocate for gun control."

      "This fact should be making headlines: An extra 50 million people will be at risk of hunger by 2050 due to climate change. And the world's poorest countries are least prepared and at greatest risk."

      "The D.C. City Council adopted a measure that removes criminal penalties for possession of up to one ounce of marijuana for adults and replaces them with a civil fine of $25."

      "A bill to decriminalize marijuana possession is moving forward in Maryland. Earlier this month, the Senate approved a bill that would remove criminal penalties for possession of up to 10 grams of marijuana and replace them with a civil fine."

      "At a highly emotional news conference this week, mothers of children with epilepsy slammed Gov. Mark Dayton for continuing to block a widely supported medical marijuana bill."

      "Idaho’s governor signed a virtual death warrant for hundreds of the state’s wolves. The new law, HB470, establishes a $400,000 special fund, the sole purpose of which is killing as many wolves as possible. It is part of a broader effort by wolf-haters to reduce Idaho’s wolf population down to 150 animals – which means killing more than 450 wolves."

      "The sweeping anti-choice law that closed a third of Texas abortion clinics on October 31, 2013, will continue to devastate women’s lives and deny them their constitutional rights. Many of those clinics remain inoperable, and each new day that they can’t serve patients increases the likelihood they will never reopen their doors. The bottom line: millions of women in Texas live nowhere near an abortion provider."

      "Well-known oil company Exxon-Mobil recently revealed its plans to pump toxic tar sands oil through pipelines along the East coast of the United States. These deadly substances would travel through a 63-year-old pipeline, which runs through a sensitive moose habitat. Since moose feed on aquatic plants in lakes, rivers, and wetlands—often submerging themselves underwater to reach vegetation beneath the surface—a tar sands oil spill in their habitat would have a devastating effect on their already threatened survival."

      "The state of Oregon has granted three of the four permits that would allow Ambre Energy to build a coal-export terminal on the Columbia River and ship coal from Montana to Asia.

      "I'll bet you've noticed coal and oil trains in the news lately. Every week there's another derailment, spill, or explosion around the country. Did you know that out-of-state energy corporations want to dramatically expand transport of these toxic substances to ports on Puget Sound? They plan to ship oil and coal to refineries along the West Coast and to power plants in Asia to be burned, polluting the air, and changing global climate."

      "The Copenhagen Zoo recently euthanized four healthy lions, two adults and two cubs, to make room for a new male lion. This is the same zoo that killed a healthy 18-month old giraffe earlier this year to prevent inbreeding rather than finding it a home with another zoo or sanctuary. As with the giraffe, the zoo said it failed to find a new home for the lions."

      "The Kane County Animal Control volunteers have been keeping a close eye on a Hampshire farm petting zoo in the state of Illinois because they have not kept up with their animal health guidelines. Because the farm has not been keeping up with strict county regulations, the county animal control team obtained a search warrant to see if what they were told by people who visited the farm have been true. Sadly enough, the authorities found the animals at the farm in horrid conditions and they needed to be removed immediately. The animal control team were told by the local residents that there were deceased animals on the property, and that is when the investigation into the farm started. During the investigation they discovered a number of dead horses, along with dead chickens, llamas, goats, rabbits, and many more. This is a huge discovery since there were over 90 known living animals on the farm. Authorities took over and had the surviving animals checked by a local veterinarian."

      "The geese population at South Gate Pond in Ocean Pines, Maryland has become a major concern for environmental groups and local residents. The Environmental and Natural Assets committee determined that goose waste in this area harms water quality and that the geese create traffic problems. The committee determined that the best way to deal with these problems is to simply kill the geese."

      "Animal sanctuaries are meant to keep animals safe, healthy and happy. Unfortunately for the animals that end up at some ‘sanctuaries,’ such as the Barry R. Kirshner Wildlife Foundation in California, this is not always the case. Former volunteers at the Kirshner Wildlife Foundation have recently come forward to report animal abuse, neglect, and deaths. The sanctuary owner, Roberta Kirshner, has been accused of failing to treat sick and injured animals to the point that many animals died, as well as inflicting (and instructing volunteers to inflict) injuries on the animals."

      "The recent deaths of two chimpanzees and three birds have led to what is at least the fourth United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) investigation of the G. W. Exotic Animal Park in Wynnewood, Oklahoma. The park has had a long history of unexplained deaths and many of its prior investigations are still ongoing."

    March 22, 2014

    Besides the Ukranian insurrection, the Syrian indiscriminate killings and mass migrations of the populace, and the Iranian leader questioning the historical validity of the Holocaust: "The Holocaust is an event whose reality remains uncertain and, if it happened, it's uncertain how it happened." -- Ali Khamenei, Iran's Supreme Leader, here on the homefront this past month's been one of empty Congressional inaction (how unusual!) -- automatically refusing to confirm any of the President's nominees for the most ridiculous and irrelevant of reasons.

    Sarah Palin, Paul Ryan, and Rand Paul continue to amaze. Not by what they have to say, mind you, but that anyone cares what they have to say.

    February 22, 2014

    Senator Ted Cruz--you remember him: Republican, Texan, irrational, anal-retentive, leader of the Tea Partiers--was awarded Statesman of the Year in Florida. One must consider the source; after all, this is the state that brought us the Bush/Gore fiasco. Now, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine were not only members of our Founding Fathers but could also be considered statesmen in the true world-stage sense of the word. Would anyone with the slightest shred of common sense consider madman Cruz to be of the same caliber as they?

    We accord praise to the most worthless and undeserving of government actors these days. Have we been so vulgarized by what passes for honest values and genuine character that we bestow unwarranted compliments to just anybody with the biggest mouth or most extreme opinon and willingness to act uncaring of others? Cruz stands out, but is self-righteous, ostentatious behavior a sufficient criterion for respect? On second thought, perhaps I go too far, give him too much credit, calling him righteous. His actions are more like those of a spoiled shallow child who's learned that saying no and whining will get the most attention. He's an entertainer, nothing more, and not a very enjoyable one at that.

    So we hand out Statesman of the Year awards the way we hand out others of the many entertainment awards. However, the ones with which we're familiar are intended for those who excel in one field or another; except for being a fool and an obstructionist, I don't think Cruz qualifies in any, certainly not as a statesman or even a responsible adult in a position to do something helpful and worthwhile for the people of this country.

    If Cruz were considered to be sincere he would also have to be deemed a sociopath, out of touch with reality. An oxymoron to be sure but Congress is riddled with contradictory personalities; hence the gridlock and inability to perform the service for which they were hired.

    I'll bet the room of shouting Cruz enthusiasts smelled of greasy chicken and redneck sweat. I can just see it, I've been there.

    February 7, 2014

    It's a testament to the deplorable state of mainstream media with its sensationalism, slanted editorializing, and preoccupation with trivia, gossip, and distractions that the venues exposing the bull and hypocracy forever in the air can be found only on Jon Stewart's The Daily Show and Stephen Colbert's Report. Otherwise, you have independent and participatory news sources like Free Speech TV [Democracy Now!], Link TV, PIVOT, and RT, all of which have their own websites, as you can see. Also, looking at what's happening around the world from the perspective of foreign news sources, like Al Jazeera, gives not only a broader and more detailed view, coming from people who live in these areas, but also lets we Americans see what's happening here from a point of view we might find surprising and humbling, a picture our localized news outlets avoid.

    I would also like to point out that we're living in a country where the most popular televison program is The Walking Dead.

    God help us.

    February 2, 2014

    This is said from outrage and sadness, not hatred. The Japanese people, that offshoot of humanity responsible for the atrocities in Nanking, China in 1937 and the Bataan Death March, are about to hold their annual dolphin-eating festival. That's right, I said dolphin, as in intelligent, sociable, playful mammals capable of communicating with one another through a bona-fide language. There is something terribly wrong with those people. They give credence to the understanding of evolution that when a population of a given species is separated and isolated for whatever reasons from the main mass for a long enough time, they evlove into a completely different species. I believe it's the case with the Japanese. How else to explain their complete lack of empathy and refusal to accept the common humane principles the rest of the world lives by?

  • Condemn Japanese Prime Minister for Defending Dolphin Slaughter | February 2, 2014 - Animal Petitions

  • Pod of captive dolphins killed one-by-one in Japanese bloodbath festival as Yoko Ono pleads with cruel hunters to stop | January 20, 2014 - Daily Mail Online

  • Help Stop The Slaughter of Dolphins in Taiji, Japan | Sea Shepherd Conservation Society

  • 250+ Bottlenose Dolphins Captured & Held Overnight In The Cove; Captive Selection & Slaughter At ~ 1 Pm PT Today | January 17, 2014

    January 27, 2014

  • Democracy Now!

  • North Carolina: Battleground State | VIDEO (46 minutes) - January 3, 2014 - Bill Moyers Home Page
    Big money has moved North Carolina far to the right politically but citizen protesters are fighting back against “extremist policies.” See why the conflict unfolding in North Carolina could be a testing ground for what’s to come in every state.

  • State of Conflict: Bill Moyers on North Carolina's Right-Wing Takeover and the Citizens Fighting Back | Video - YouTube

  • Here is the entire Bill Moyers doc on N.C. that UNC-TV tried to bury | Video - The Clog

    January 20, 2014

    Since humans first established villages, towns, communities, we've been embroiled in conflicts, both inner, between various factions, and outer, between the townsfolk and the raiding barbarians; conflicts and wars between the Shias and the Sunnis, the Muslems and the Christians, the invading Europeans and the indigenous peoples of the Americas, between the Romans, Mongols, Germans and everybody who isn't, between the invading aliens and earthlings, the list is endless. Wars between the ups and the downs, the befores and the afters, the haves and the have-nots. It's a mindset, inculcated and ingrained, practically hardwired into our brain, a language we speak to ourselves. This aggressive mentality comes from somewhere, an unfortunate derivative of what our species nurtured and needed to possess at the very beginning of our time, a natural species imperative to survive with which we have an ancestral bond. Our sports embody it; our personal relationships employ it; our refusal to suppress it validates it. Its guilt-free expression in certain predefined contexts reinforces its intrinsic nature.

    Aggression justifies counter-aggression as a response to tyranny or attack; that's completely acceptable. It's the predisposition to address potentially dangerous situations with aggression, triggered into action by a subjective perception of the intolerable, that's the problem. Without reflection we believe it to be the innate and necessary driving force that maintains our way of life, has been and always will be. We are at war with nature, with the Earth, with the universe at large, fearing asteroid collisions, cosmic radiation, black holes, and alien invasions; we're ready to take on all-comers and we see them everywhere--threats. It's a point of view and an attitude. Can it ever change? Is it too late to do anything about it? Is the eventual and inevitable end self-destruction on a global scale?

    Our leaders are no less affected and afflicted. Change can come about only incrementally, nothing grand is likely to happen, no new inner structure is liable to overthrow the old within our psyche, inspire new genes to manifest. There will be no sudden shift as with the magnetic field of the Earth, no abrupt about-face with a new attitude slowly and methodically instilled from the start, from birth. Hatred and the propensity for conflict is handed down, passed along as hereditary legacy from one generation to the next as though the most sacred truth to be treated with the utmost respect--dogma. Common sense and the lessons of history are our only hope to correct what has gone before.

    To whit and of a practical consideration: sanctions proposed and imposed on Iran can serve only to cause suffering to its people and justify anger and hatred towards the United States. The weak-minded on both sides are ready to fight. This cannot be, this can be avoided. We need to change the way we do business and get away from old habits of ten thousand years duration. Iran is not going to attack us, so what our Congress proposes looks like bullying, and it is, what else can you call it?

    Below are relevant links:

  • S.1881: Nuclear Weapon Free Iran Act of 2013 | Summary

  • Iran sanctions now causing food insecurity, mass suffering | October 7, 2012 - The Guardian

  • Imposing more sanctions on Iran would not just trash nuclear talks, it would hurt Iranian reformers | January 14, 2014 - The Daily Kos

  • Iran Sanctions | January 20, 2014 - US State Department

  • Q&A: Iran Sanctions | January 20, 2014 - BBC News

  • US to Begin Easing Economic Sanctions on Iran | January 20, 2014 - ABC News

    January 14, 2014

    Long ago in the Andromeda galaxy on the planet Xulcatur close to the central black hole a cave serpent dutifully tended her eggs. After they hatched and grew to maturity, they crawled to the nearby village. Now this was a magical planet filled with magical beings who could take whatever form they chose. The residents of this village were humanoid and in order to move about freely, the serpents morphed to appear like them. They attended school and chose paths dependent on their inclinations. In time and seeking adventure, they enlisted in the Galactic Explorers and after training were sent along on a distant voyage to the nearest galaxy, ours, the Mily Way, although they didn't call it that.

    To make a long story short, they canvassed one star system after another looking for intelligent life. They found several. They measured, assessed, analyzed, and filed away their reports. Eventually, they came upon our system and discovered Earth. Because it appeared simlar to their own, they were intrigued. Could this be another magical planet, they wondered? They decided to investigate and so landed in an obscure area to hide their ship. As they were capable of manipulating time--that's how they could traverse such vast distances quickly--they had plenty of it. Accordingly, they chose to spend some living amongst the strange inhabitants--as they saw us--in order to collect a detailed study, the first of its kind. Unfortunately, from their perspective, they were disappointed to learn that the dominant intelligent beings could not transform externally, but all was not forsaken, however, for they discovered that these beings--us--could change identities from within to suit their purposes, a feat they couldn't do. Indeed, it was a magical planet after all, only in a curiously different way.

    They transited to our time and morphed further to appear human. Besides being explorers for the homeworld, these were mischievous creatures--serpents, remember--and so decided it would be fun to affect the course of events in a less than friendly way. They didn't care, they weren't from here. They readily saw that control was held by the wealthy, but to become such took work and a considerable amount of luck, although they didn't call it that. Instead they chose a political life in a country called the United States. They didn't have to do any actual work and the wealthy catered to them as people who could intercede on their behalf in their dealings with the government. Being serpents at heart they were naturally drawn to the Republican Party. As a group they climbed the political ladder and were elected to Congress, eventually forming a faction within that party. After studying American history, they decided it would be clever to choose a name for themselves that conjured up heroism and a sense of rebeliousness against established rule in the minds of Americans. To whit, they called themselves the Tea Party Conservatives. Periodically, they meet in a private secure location to commemorate their origins as snakes from Xulcatur and to slither around in the grass as a ritual of remembrance, their true nature never to be compromised. And thus a political group dedicated to undermining the quality of life of ordinary citizens and the functionality of government was born.

    January 12, 2014

    I am not paranoid, really, nor am I one of the many conspiracy-minded folks we seem to run into occasionally, people we know. Some people seem to think they're smart because they believe in conspiracies--nobody's gonna pull the wool over their eyes. I know people who are convinced the moon landings--all six of them--were faked. People who are convinced our intelligence apparatus orchestrated the World Trade Center attacks. People who believe climate change warnings are a big hoax; why anyone, scientists, would do that is a mystery, but conspiracy freaks don't need a reason, they allow for an agenda beneath the surface, an ulterior motive that has to do with controlling some facet of our lives. I don't know. Nonetheless, I can't help but think there's a conspiracy going on with Congress, specifically the Republicans, and even more specifically, the so-called Tea Party enthusiasts.

    Speaker John Boehner promised two years ago to put a Jobs program on his agenda. He didn't and hasn't, in spite of the fact that the country's infrastructure continues to crumble and is in desperate need of upgrades. There's always plenty of money for defense contractors but none for railroads, vehicle roads, bridges, electrical grids, and so forth. We're still in the midst of the worst recession since the thirty's. People are still losing their jobs and homes in spite of what Fox news is trying to convince us about an upturn. Food stamps have been drastically cut; unemployment compensation payments have been stopped; Ted Cruz, a spokeman for the Tea party folks, wants to cut Social Security and Medicare and repeal universal health insurance coverage--Obamacare, they call it. Those on the bottom of the economic ladder, a number that has grown considerably over the past few years as the gap between rich and poor has widened, are being pushed into a corner, a dark tight mean corner, even while the top five percent or so are being continually protected.

    What the hell is going on here, I ask myself, me who is not a conspiracy-minded type? Is the situation as blatant as all that? Are they truly that arrogant?

    They insult the workers of the country, calling them slackers looking for a handout from the government. Cutting food stamps and denying continuance of unemployment benefits will somehow encourage the recipients to get off their lazy butts and find a job in a market where there aren't many worth a crap. Where is Boehner's Jobs program? They seem to be on a crusade of some kind. Could it all be an accidental confluence of disparate circumstances, could they sincerely have the best interests of the nation at heart by coming down on those who need assistance from their government? Could it be true that our 'leaders' honestly can't find any other way to help America out of the recession? What is going on? Who are these people? They don't act like Americans.

    I smell a conspiracy.

    January 10, 2014

    I signed a petition that was sent to my senator in Washington state, Maria Cantwell, requesting that the cuts to food stamps be taken out of the farm bill. I received a response from her office today. Below is that email:

    Dear Mr. Dorn,

    Thank you for contacting me about the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. I appreciate hearing from you about this important matter.

    According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service, roughly 45 million Americans are hungry or living on the edge of hunger. This figure represents more than 14.9 percent of American households. Over 15 percent of all households in Washington are food insecure and our state ranks 14th in the nation in hunger, which is higher than our neighboring states of Oregon and Idaho. It is obvious to me that too many Washington families are still on the verge of hunger and malnourishment. We must lower these numbers.

    The Senate passed the Agricultural Reform, Food, and Jobs Act of 2013 (S.954), also known as the farm bill, on June 10, 2013, to reauthorize the federal government's agriculture and food programs. I supported passage of this legislation, which will strengthen investments in Washington State's agriculture economy and research, sustain local and organic food programs.

    The Senate farm bill includes an initiative I championed to include more lentils, dry peas, beans, and chickpeas in school lunch menus. This initiative will authorize research grants to further examine the nutritional benefits of these vegetables, provides technical expertise to help food companies use pulse crops in their products, and increases their inclusion in school breakfasts and lunches. These crops are inexpensive, nutrient-rich, and support thousands of jobs in Washington State.

    Despite these successes, the legislation unfortunately also cuts $4.1 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Representing the majority of farm bill spending, the food stamp program cuts across rural and urban communities, benefitting millions of people who experience hunger. This cut in funding will decrease food stamp benefits for about 500,000 households by an average of $90 per month. On May 21, 2013, I voted in support of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's (D-NY) amendment (S. Amdt. 931) to restore these funds; unfortunately this amendment was not agreed to and will not be in the final bill.

    Maria Cantwell
    United States Senator

    Fifty years ago today, President Lyndon Johnson—a Democrat—declared an “unconditional war on poverty in America." But now, Congress is willing to pass a Farm Bill that cuts food stamps another $90 per month for another 850,000 poor families.

    Where could the money come from, I wonder? The defense budget? It costs a million dollars for one Tomahawk missile. Why no, they need those to practice with; as many as possible, war with Iran is imminent. How about...

    "Last year over 750,000 Americans were arrested on marijuana charges. Many of them were sentenced to mandatory prison time. Our courts and prisons are clogged with non-violent people whose only offense is smoking, buying or selling marijuana. While our nation is in a serious financial crisis, it spends literally billions of dollars annually chasing down responsible adults who are good, tax-paying citizens in all regards except for the occasional use of marijuana." - Rick Steves

  • Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2013 | United States Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry
  • Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2013 | Bill Text Versions - S.954 | Library of Congress - Thomas

  • H.R.3102: Nutrition Reform and Work Opportunity Act of 2013 |
  • H.R.3102: Nutrition Reform and Work Opportunity Act of 2013 | Library of Congress - Thomas

    January 8, 2014

    The Congressional Republicans are such insulting degrading bastards. Their cynical comments about americans on unemployment insurance are wholly without justification. Their paycheck comes directly from taxpayers. They don't produce anything, manufacture anything, perform any practical service, yet they have the audacity to characterize those who do as con-artists and bums; people who need to be able to pay their bills and eat regularly, men and women with families, single mothers with children in school. Let them try looking for a gig lightheaded and disoriented from lack of food or severely stressed from a less than stable living situation. When you have little to no income, your confidence and capacity to do is seriously compromised; you lean on friends and family too much and end up losing respect for yourself. And the instability that comes with being jobless eats away at a person's sense of control.

    Congressional politicians spend three days a week at their 'worksite.' They make decent money, have homes to live in and full insurance coverage for themselves and their families. And this is not counting the special interest and coroporate contributions and gifts they stuff into their pockets. They are the very epitome and definition of the word bum. They have no idea what a decent day's work means; they never get their hands dirty--in the literal sense--or suffer from overworked muscles. And yet they have the arrogant self-important umitigated gall to attempt to strip away the dignity of their betters.

    The proper role of government leaders--and I use that word only as a reference--in trying times is to bolster confidence and inspire success as they seek avenues to aid the distressed. The Republicans do none of that, just the opposite, in fact. They are underminers and saboteurs, behaving as though filled with hatred and contempt for their fellow americans in need of assistance. And yet, mystifying as it is, they continue to be elected into office. Perhaps we americans have truly become a land of guilt-ridden masochists, deserving to suffer submissively at the hands of worthless bums.

    Republicans in Congress need to get their asses kicked.

    Six Myths About Food Stamps | October 8, 2013 - by Dave Johnson |

    January 6, 2014

    The curious case of tax dollars: After the collapse of Wall Street institutions, brought on by self-destructive greed and fraudulent practices, wholly illegal and imoral yet never prosecuted, the american taxpayer came to the rescue with a magnanomous and mindnimbing gift of billions of dollars. Here's the blurb from the documentary "Inside Job": " [the] 2010 Oscar Winner for Best Documentary, 'Inside Job' provides a comprehensive analysis of the global financial crisis of 2008, which at a cost over $20 trillion, caused millions of people to lose their jobs and homes in the worst recession since the Great Depression, and nearly resulted in a global financial collapse."

    And yet, they, the arrogant Wall Street perpetrators of this crisis returned to business as usual. Now, here's what I don't get. Congress-- I'm assuming they hold the purse strings and are responsible for allocating funds--had no problem coming up with the bailout bucks. However, they can't find a nickle to save food stamp and unemployment insurance benefits for the working and poor classes. What gives?

    I voted twice for President Obama because he was clearly, to my mind, the best man for the job. But I fear he is dropping the ball on helping those of us who need it most while giving away the farm to the rich and powerful. Traditionally, the Democratic Party was on the side of the little guy, the man and woman in the street who have sacrficed their lives in wars and paid the price of citizentry in many other ways. People who, by and large, have played by the rules, wanting only to have a decent life and to trust in the government to come to their aid when they need it. But I've gotten very disillusioned with a Congress that doesn't seem to give a damn about them, and I include myself in the them.

    No one is representing the vast majority of the amercian people anymore. We're on our own, apparently. Nobody from the wealthy class volunteers for military service to fight in these extended wars we're mired in, why should they? Senator Ted Cruz wants to cut Social Security and Medicare, and for some reason that baffles me, he has influence. The real war that's going on, one with meaning, is between the government and the people. The gulf between the rich and the vast majority of amercans has widened to the point where we can justifiably talk about two completely different countries. The top five percent don't even identify with being americans, they're part of an international elite, a world unto themselves.

    We need help, but where it's going to come from is impossible to imagine.

    January 4, 2014

      Of the many informative, enlightening, and attitude-altering documentaries you could or may watch all year, include these three, please. They challenge our perceptions and ingrained beliefs about how the world around us, specifically America, works. We are being duped, lied to, manipulated, and treated with contempt, and it needs to stop, before it's too late.

    1. Watch Free Documentary Online - "The War You Don't See" - 1:36
      A powerful and timely investigation into the media's role in war, tracing the history of embedded and independent reporting from the carnage of World War One to the destruction of Hiroshima, and from the invasion of Vietnam to the current war in Afghanistan and disaster in Iraq.

    2. "Food, Inc." | 94 minutes - IMDb

      Part 1: For most Americans, the ideal meal is fast, cheap, and tasty. Food, Inc. examines the costs of putting value and convenience over nutrition and environmental impact.

      Part 1: For most Americans, the ideal meal is fast, cheap, and tasty. Food, Inc. examines the costs of putting value and convenience over nutrition and environmental impact.

      Director Robert Kenner explores the subject from all angles, talking to authors, advocates, farmers, and CEOs, like co-producer Eric Schlosser (Fast Food Nation), Michael Pollan (The Omnivore’s Dilemma), Gary Hirschberg (Stonyfield Farms), and Barbara Kowalcyk, who’s been lobbying for more rigorous standards since E. coli claimed the life of her two-year-old son.

      Part 2: The filmmaker takes his camera into slaughterhouses and factory farms where chickens grow too fast to walk properly, cows eat feed pumped with toxic chemicals, and illegal immigrants risk life and limb to bring these products to market at an affordable cost. If eco-docs tends to preach to the converted, Kenner presents his findings in such an engaging fashion that Food, Inc. may well reach the very viewers who could benefit from it the most: harried workers who don’t have the time or income to read every book and eat non-genetically modified produce every day.

      • "Food, Inc." | Amazon
        The free full online version is difficult to find--I looked hard, believe me--so this might be your best bet. It's inexpensive and worthwhile and safe. However, if you're a DIRECTV customer, you can find it at: "Food, Inc.".

    3. "Inside Job" (2010) | Youtube - 1:44
      2010 Oscar Winner for Best Documentary, 'Inside Job' provides a comprehensive analysis of the global financial crisis of 2008, which at a cost over $20 trillion, caused millions of people to lose their jobs and homes in the worst recession since the Great Depression, and nearly resulted in a global financial collapse. Through exhaustive research and extensive interviews with key financial insiders, politicians, journalists, and academics, the film traces the rise of a rogue industry which has corrupted politics, regulation, and academia. It was made on location in the United States, Iceland, England, France, Singapore, and China.

    December 31, 2013

    "I think it was absolutely a mistake for President Obama and Harry Reid to force a government shutdown." -- Senator Ted Cruz.

    December 4, 2013

    A friend recently handed me this comic on Republican Alternatives to Obamacare that I think you might get a kick out of.

    November 29, 2013

    You need to watch this documentary (listed below) on the deplorable and undeserved mistreatment of teachers, the low-esteem with which they're held, and the practical consequences for individual students and our society. After parents, they play the most crucial role in shaping the minds and character of the future citizens of any functioning society. Teachers are the keystone species in the social ecosystem, and that position and grave responsibility is underappreciated and goes unrewarded. How many people can point to a specific teacher who inspired them to follow their dream, to believe in themselves, and as a result, to experience a fulfilling life with family, friends, and colleagues? And how many can recall a teacher who simply made them feel good about themselves and planted the seed of learning-for-its-own-sake? I know I can look back at a few. Teachers affect, direct, and transform the lives of young people, moreso oftentimes than anyone else, especially if their home lives are not all that wonderful. If nothing else, they make a difference, probably the most significant one, and so, don't we want the best possible candidates instructing our children?

        "Directed by Academy Award winner Vanessa Roth and produced by Dave Eggers and Ninive Caligari, "American Teacher: A Documentary" aims to address the difficult questions about the broken public school system through honest dialogue with the people who strive to give our children a proper education. The film is part of the Teacher Salary Project and is based on the book “Teachers Have it Easy: The Big Sacrifices and Small Salaries of America’s Teachers.” "

    From an article (Dec.3, 2013) in the Boston Globe on the recent "Program for International Student Assessment" tests, I excerpt these few paragraphs:

      "One of the problem areas was math, where the US score of 481 points was 13 points lower than the international average. In science and reading, US scores of 497 and 498 respectively, were not measurably different from the international average, making it a statistical tie.

      "The results also revealed gaps in achievement among students of different racial and ethnic backgrounds, and students from low-income households tended to score lower on the exams than their more prosperous peers.

      "US Education Secretary Arne Duncan called the US performance “a picture of educational stagnation.”

      "'This is a reality at odds with our aspiration to have the best-educated, most-competitive workforce in the world,' Duncan said in a statement."

    The single most important resource of any country is its people. For a country to be strong, healthy, and capable of rational informed decisions, its people must be well-educated and encouraged to realize their potential and have the complete spectrum of opportunities open to pursue. Finland, Singapore, and South Korea have the best records when it comes to their educational systems. Their teachers are well-paid and because the profession is held in such high esteem schools can pick and choose, recruit, the best and the brightest in a stiff competitive market. In particular, in Finland a career in teaching is considered more laudable than one in the medical or legal professions. Right now, America lies somewhere in the middle of the pack worldwide with regard to student achievement and learned skills. For the future, which is now, a good solid education is mandatory for the jobs available and for a general ability to function in an increasingly technical world.

    Here's a few links you might find interesting; I recommend them. I watched the video on the new TV channel PIVOT.

    And here's something else not entirely unrelated. Food stamp benefits have just been cut to save money. Did you know that a single Tomahawk missile costs a million dollars? Our priorities are so screwed up right now it's not funny, and the folks in Congress are running around talking about shit that has nothing to do with day to day living, except, in this case, to make matters harder for people who need help the most.

    How about this for a cure:

      In an Idealized Alternative Reality: Suppose the people who created and are responsible for the financial crisis precipitating mass loss of homes and jobs were to have their fortunes confiscated in order to pay for low-income housing and plenty of food to eat for the poor (working and not) and their children? Is that too far-fetched? Oh wait, isn't that socialism? Badddd!

    "These bins are for Wal-Mart employees to donate [food] to other employees. And where can Wal-Mart's low-wage workers find cheap food to donate? Wal-Mart. Anyone can afford food there... except people who work at Wal-Mart." -- Stephen Colbert.

    Walmart is the largest employer in the country--possibly the world--and because most of its employees are underpaid, they have to resort to using food stamps to make ends meet. Brilliant labor-expense strategy by Walmart: Have the American taxpayer supplement their employees salaries.

    Addendum - January 31: Walmart Stumbles on SNAP: Warns of Lost Profits

    November 21, 2013

    Yesterday I watched Charles Ferguson's "Inside Job." I think every American should. I can't say I understood the mechanics of the financial doings Mister Ferguson so intricately delineated--my brain doesn't work that way--but the bigger picture and the gist of it I certainly got. Below I include a link where one might watch the film and a link to his book "Predator Nation."

    Here are some resources that may help the uninitiated, like myself, understand the film and the economic situation.

    From the perspective of the eloquently presented film and with no exaggeration, organized crime in the form of the Wall Street-Academia complex makes the mafia (yes, they do exist) look like a bunch of boyscouts knocking over gumball machines. President Eisenhower warned us of the Military-Industrial complex; now we have this. Organized crime has been directing the country for the past 25 years, becoming increasingly entrenched with each administration, and the perpetrators, who are well known, continue to get away with it. Not a single one, of which there are thousands on different levels, has been charged with a crime. They not only caused the global recession we're still going through but ruined the lives of millions of Americans and managed to restructure society from top to bottom.

    Surprisingly, President Obama has some of them on his team in strategic positions, positions that allow these people, devoid of morality, ethics, and conscience, to perpetuate their reign. And academia, for its part, has been instrumental in shaping economic and financial policy by advising the administration and consulting for all aspects of government and by teaching their mode of economic theory--deregulation and then do whatever you can get away with--to their students. They fluidly slide from government to Ivory Towers to Wall Street; it's become one world, an elite class who share the same aristocratic vision. It's unfortunate that the membership is so widespread and pervasive that the people most qualified to help the economy, to straighten things out, are also the people who have created the conditions that are in need of reform, conditions that best serve them and their exorbitant lifestyles. What is currently going on in Congress between obstructionist Republicans and ineffectual Democrats is nothing more than a smokescreen, a distraction from the real politics going on behind the scenes.

    I came away from the film, which I watched twice and probably will again in order to attempt to absorb all the information so compactly presented, with a sense of total despair as though I'd just been informed an enormous asteroid was about to decimate the Earth or that an uncontrollable and deadly disease was spreading around the planet. The perpetrators appeared to have the aura of an alien invasion or of a group of sociopaths intent on destroying the world. Unfortunately, A James Bond is not going to save the day. And it's not like they didn't and don't know better. They were fully aware, for example, that they were selling bogus unsafe so-called financial derivatives (CDOs) and yet they did so anyway and made fortunes by betting these instruments would prove worthless--financial entities their own firms were selling and touting as good solid investments.

    Moreover, these institutions own, one way or the other, rating firms which gave these worthless derivatives triple 'A' ratings. The people involved had to know these ratings were not a true assessment, and by facilitating their sale, they committed open, unadulterated fraud for which they've never been held legally accountable. So they knew, they knew, they're that knowledgeable and smart; they just have no ethics or principles or moral compass by which to live. It's all about greed and self-centeredness and low character.

    When the ponzi scheme finally collapsed and these major institutions went bankrupt, the taxpayers bailed them out to the tune of billions of dollars, money that could've gone towards the public good in many forms, and they, in their arrogance, turned around and gave their people, the ones who created the situation in the first place, millions in bonuses, millions of taxpayer dollars, which their employees accepted without conscience or misgivings. How do they justify this behaviour? Why are none of them in prison?

    Organized crime--the Wall Street-Academia complex--has been running and continues to run the nation. They've essentialy hijacked our country, and apparently, no one in power has the will or the means to do anything about it.

  • "Inside Job" (2010 | Watch Free Documentary Online
    2010 Oscar Winner for Best Documentary, 'Inside Job' provides a comprehensive analysis of the global financial crisis of 2008, which at a cost over $20 trillion, caused millions of people to lose their jobs and homes in the worst recession since the Great Depression, and nearly resulted in a global financial collapse. Through exhaustive research and extensive interviews with key financial insiders, politicians, journalists, and academics, the film traces the rise of a rogue industry which has corrupted politics, regulation, and academia. It was made on location in the United States, Iceland, England, France, Singapore, and China.

  • Charles H. Ferguson - "Predator Nation" - Corporate Criminals, Political Corruption, and the Hijacking of America | Free Download from FileTurko
    Two years after directing the Academy Award-winning documentary, “Inside Job,” filmmaker Charles Ferguson returns with a new book, “Predator Nation: Corporate Criminals, Political Corruption, and the Hijacking of America.” According to Ferguson, a "predatory elite" has "taken over significant portions of economic policy and of the political system, and also, unfortunately, major portions of the economics discipline."

    November 16, 2013

    Last year an estimated 46 million americans, including 7.2 million children, were without health insurance. The Affordable Care Act is meant to resolve this situation. Yet the Congressional Republicans are bound and determined to undermine that protection to the point of irrational obsession. Their latest complaint is that people who have insurance my be dropped or have their premiums raised. Well, that actually remains to be seen and, if so, would be one of the problems that needs to be fixed as the program goes forward. But that's not the point of the Act.

    All social programs --social security, medicare, medicade--have had glitches at inception and with implementation, but, thanks to the effort of Congress to work out the bugs, in spite of detractors wanting to scuttle them, they were eventually put into action, and we are the better for them. The ACA is brand new and needs to go through the same processs, the same field testing-feedback-fixes-more field testing and so forth until it's running smoothly. The Republicans would better serve the american people if they got onboard with it. If the 46 million people without insurance, whether because they can't afford it or have pre-existing medical conditions, are able to take insurance for themselves and their families off the table, they would then have the time and money to concentrate on other important matters, like housing, food, clothing, transportation, and education. The Republicans, particularly the two drama queens, John Boehner and Teddy Cruz, don't want this to happen, they don't want the middle and working poor classes to get a leg up, to clear away the worry and concern. They are at war with these 46 million americans.

    People work sick and injured, I know this for a fact, I've done it and I know others who have when working at jobs that don't supply medical benefits, and if you don't work you don't get paid and risk being fired. Consider Walmart and the Service industry for two prime examples. This prevalent condition lowers productivity and impacts quality of life, and, not to exaggerate, accounts for a significant negative factor affecting individual and family life: excessive drug and alcohol use, physical and emotional abuse, and the absence of proper nurturing of offspring, resulting in the next generation having the same problems. How can the Republicans say they're trying to help people suffering from this major disadvantage and chronic source of anxiety when they expend so much negative energy trying to undermine and nullify a Law intended to correct and normalize their condition and improve quality of life?

    They represent corporate interests, in particualar, the financial sector responsible for our present economic crisis and the largest contributor to their coffers, and the wealthy, that one percent who make more than the rest of us combined, and clearly don't give a damn about the 46 million without insurance. And, they have nothing of their own to offer as an alternative health program, one that throws a blanket of protection over the entire population. They should be spending their tax-paid time working on other issues of a more pressing nature, and there certainly are plenty of those, doing something positive for the country. Nothing is getting done, gridlock. It's an embarrassment to the world, to see our leaders bickering instead of working together towards a mutually beneficial goal, an objective that has to do with helping our own people.

    I keep repeating that number--46 million--because it seems that we americans need to hear facts stated over and over in order to get them through our head, their significance.

    Forty-six million americans, including seven million children, don't have medical insurance.

    How can the Republicans say they're trying to help people by attempting to undermine the ACA with the propaganda of failure, saying it's broken before it's even been road tested, and with obvious lies and misleading disinformation as to its consequences? They pronounce that americans don't want it. Christ almighty, americans are not even familiar with it yet, have not had the opportunity in real-time practice to see how it works and how it impacts their lives, what advantage it gives them, how it might alleviate needless stress.

    Europe and Canada have had health insurance coverage for their citizens, all their citizens, for decades. At first, no doubt, there had to be problems with implementation; as well they probably had their share of Chicken Littles, yet we, the leader of the Free World, are only now attempting to grow into a society that takes care of ALL its people, especially those on the bottom of the economic ladder. And let's also remember, the ACA is based on the Massachussetts model, a success story that had birthing difficulties. What spellbound hold do congressional Republicans have on the american psyche that allows them to be voted into office again and again when they have so clearly demonstrated contempt for the welfare of the vast majority of the american people?

    It's disheartening; they should be ashamed, but they're not. They keep attempting to convince all of us that it's in our best interest to mainatain the status quo--medical coverage for those who can afford it and to hell with the 46 million who can't or who have pre-existing medical conditions. Whose side are they on?

    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.

    Key Facts about the Uninsured Population | The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

    Children's Health | Children's Defense Fund

    November 12, 2013

    Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina--the only state in the Union where both dog fighting and bear baiting are legal--has proven again what a complete obstructionist moron he is. He has sworn on news programs that he intends to block all of President Obama's nominees because of the Benghazi attack. The propagandistic irrationality and logical sophistry [newspeak] of the Congressional Republicans continue to amaze. It's mindnumbing. No doubt there are those in this country, particularly among the ignoranti in South Carolina, who believe that somehow blocking qualified persons from being nominated to administrative positions is an adequate and reasonable response to the terrorist attack on the Lybian consulate.

    I know a man who believes the great Biblical flood carved out the Grand Canyon and that the Earth is only six thousand years old. And there are millions of other like-minded folks in this country. I can accept idiots like that in the general populace, they usually don't rise to positions that affect us on a broad scope, intruding into our lives and those of our families. But now, it's all too clear, and frightenly so, that they have arrived and are flourishing in the United States Congress.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham Holds Firm on Threat to Block Obama Nominees | November 10 - Associated Press

    Jon Stewart Mocks '60 Minutes,' Lindsey Graham over Benghazi Report - November 12 - VIDEO | TPM
    Lindsey Graham Silent About '60 Minutes' Benghazi Report That He Hyped | TPM

    Graham's Hold on Government Cracks as Benghazi Story Falls Apart | November 11 - The Cable

    November 10, 2013

    John Boehner and Ted Cruz were recently spotted at a downtown New York city tattoo parlor. On their left arm they had tattooed in bright red: "Screwing Obama is our Business," and on the right, "Business is Good." Later they were seen at a Greenwich Village bar kicking back shots of tequilla with a gang of gay bikers. Who knew?

    list of politicians affiliated with tea party movement

    What we have is a clash of cultures: The rational modernists opposed to the irrational traditionalists, progressives verses ultra-conservative reactionaries. I don't mean tradition in the sense of a nation's cultural values or its collective practices like Thanksgiving Day or July Fourth celebrations, but rather the tendency, perpetuated and enforced by both Bush presidents, to place ourselves above all other countries, an arrogant isolated attitude--'You're either with us or you're against us.' This is a political tradition whose time has passed. Barak Obama sees the need for cooperation, to approach other nations as an equal in spite of, or perhaps because of, our superpower status. The rightwing Congressional Republicans adamantly refuse to surrender the highground, the superiority, the arrogance of President Bush and Vice President Cheney. But, it's time to enter the next age in the evolution of world society, not an easy thing to make happen, transforming the mindset of millions.

    When the Soviet Union collapsed, the way adults thought about the world and their place in it was replaced by a completely new order of things. Superseding the old was not possible for those whose minds had been instilled and ingrained with the worldview of the times, the historic currency of social and political media. A new order, a new way of conducting business and the workings of society could not simply be rewired overnight. Fresh minds taught in the new way were the only hope for its actualization. A society and hence the country which houses it exist solely in the minds of the participants, the inhabitants, those who give their hearts and souls and bodies to its fruition. Millions of Russians would love to bring back the glory days of Imperial Russia, some even pine for Stalin's Russia, difficult as that is to believe. It's natural to hold onto an almost romantic illusion of a previous era. But the Soviet Union was sown with seeds of its own destruction from the get-go; hopefully, that won't prove to be the case with America.

    The so-called Tea Party represents the last bastion of 'my way or the highway' kind of thinking and needs to end, however that may happen.

    November 1, 2013

    The other night Piers Morgan and Bill Maher, two people possessed of intelligence, common sense, and maturity, had a conversation on air. It was worth watching, very informative. However, they both agreed, a little too enthusiastically, that Senator Ted Cruz was brilliant, brilliant, referring to an interview with one of his Harvard professors. His brilliance was based on being good at school work. Brilliance without awareness as to the consequences of actions and the moral backbone required to choose the right path no matter how difficult has brought the people of the world more tragedy and trouble than natural disasters. It was unfortunate, I thought, that they neglected to mention that his professor attributed this brilliance to his single-minded focus, that it was so intense as to preclude any consideration of possible doubt, symptomatic of a deeply-rooted certainty bordering on obsession. Paraphrasing the professor, once Cruz had decided on a viewpoint all reasons that undermined it or pointed to the possible validity of an alternative view were discarded. This is a dangerous mind-set.

    When a person makes a decision and afterwards reflects on it based on new information or a less emotional appraisal, he oftentimes changes his mind. To me, this is a mark of maturity, responsible intelligence, and, especially in the political arena, considerable moral courage. The Republicans call it "flip-flopping" as though it were a sign of weak character, of someone with no integrity or strength of will. Morgan and Maher agreed that Cruz could very well be the next Republican candidate for president. Self-righteous arrogance and refusal to entertain the possiblity of other choices in a Commander-in-Chief can only bring negative repercussions. A man who religiously and unwaveringly adheres to his course of action regardless of its clear destructive impact on the American people, as we saw with the government shutdown, is not someone who should ever be running the country. God help us if that happens.

    When Asaad used chemical weapons on his people, the hawks in Congress wanted an immediate military repsonse. But the vast majority of Americans didn't want anything to do with it. President Obama, to his credit, refused to cave in to Congressional pressure and instead complied with the will of the people. Ted Cruz, on the other hand, in spite of the obvious detrimental impact the government shutdown was having on the country, adamantly held onto his position, refusing to relent even though it was pointless and counterproductive to his Party, ignoring the harm inflicted on the people.

    Who is the better man? Who is the more conscientious leader? Who better serves the country and the will of the people?

    There is a difference between standing on principle and being anal-retentively stubborn. Apparently, Teddy Cruz doesn't know that.

    Brilliance (mentally quick and bright) and vacuousness (lacking substance or reality) can co-exist in the same person. That was certainly the look I saw on Cruz's face in the news clips. The look of a self-centered child simply enjoying being the center of attention, without the slightest trace of responsibility or obligation towards others. Opportunism for the sake of self-aggrandizement solely, a buoyant look unencumbered by the weight of concern over consequences, unaffected by empathy, a self-absorbed spoiled rich Harvard frat boy playing with power.

    I've seen, known, people in my life who were convinced, for whatever reasons, that some significant action they had decided to undertake involving others was the right thing to do, but beneath the surface the strain of awareness of the possible harmful effects such action might have on those others revealed itself, if only in subtle ways. I saw nothing resembling that in Cruz's rapturous countenance as he vehemently worked to continue the shutdown of the government with all its negative impact on the people, just the opposite in fact.

    In the face of a person with conscience asking others to endure hardship won't be found carefree joy, rather what will be seen is the stress of concern, the contours of empathy and the burden of responsibility. To feel obligated to none but a few supporters and then try to pretend that one's actions are for the benefit of the many is a betrayal of fundamental trust and a misrepresentation of the truth of what you're about.

    I don't know how many times I heard Ted Cruz state that the American people don't like and don't want Obamacare before anyone even had a chance to find out about it in a practical hands-on way. How the hell could he know? It's unknowable. Yet, it never stopped him from saying it. He can look you right in the eyes and lie. But, you say, he's a politician, they all do that. To spout such nonsense without blinking, to claim to speak for the will of the people about something so important, knowing full well no one is going to believe it for the simple reason that it's impossible--how brilliant is that? And yet, no one that I'm aware of, no one in the media, bothered to point that out. According to polls, one-fourth of the population doesn't know that the Affordable Care Act and Obamacare are one and the same. So how smart does he have to be? So much confusion and chaos has been sown by those bastards that most of the country doesn't know up from down. Going on and on with misleading lies and false allegations and the double-speak of calling a refusal to give in to extortion a refusal to compromise has been the mainstay of the Republican leadership in both the House and the Senate. What compromise? Give us what we want and we promise not to shut down the government and default on the debt is not a compromise.

    The Affordable Care Act is a law sanctioned by the Supreme Court. Trying to undermine it by refusing to fund it and demanding that the President somehow cancel it is not even procedural let alone sensible. Shouldn't knowledge of the Constitution be a necessary requirement of all congressmen? You would think so.

    Fortunately, they pulled the plug at the last second as everyone knew they would, as they knew they would. But why put the American people through all that? For what purpose? How much money did the economy lose? Billions. How much did the inconvenience disrupt households? Can it be measured? How much loss of faith in the government did the whole circus cause? How much instability and anxiety will remain? Children playing games at our expense. It makes you sick, such pettiness and foolishness. It's sad and pathetic, as our young people continue to die in Iraq and Afghanistan, our so-called leaders jerk us around over short-sighted political ambitions and mean-spirited hatred for the President. May they all be thrown out at the next election.

    October 29, 2013

    Well, what's the latest? The NSA got sloppy and supposedly overreached itself. How about some facts? The United States has come to the aid of Europe to end two world wars and has spanned an umbrella of protection over those countries ever since. What would NATO be without us? There are more terrorist groups plotting and scheming ways to bring harm to the United States living in Europe than anywhere else in the world including the Middle East, most likely. And let us not forget, the plan to attack the World Trade Centers was hatched in Germany. So yes, of course, we're going to be spying on them. On the surface, for the sake of appearances, Europe is protesting vehemently--How could we? What gall? Where's the trust and the love?--but don't imagine they aren't spying on us. Countries have been spying on one another since there's been countries. Now, at this technological time, we have more sophisticated ways of doing it, what with satellites and cell-phones and the internet. It's embarrassing to be caught with our hands in the cookie jar, but why aren't those other countries doing more to ferret out terrorist threats? Would the attack on 911 have happened if they had been? Tiny populations compared to ours and yet they had no knowledge of such activity, of such a horrendous act to come?

    Let's get something straight. The world is not the pleasant place it used to be long ago. I have a friend who spent six years traveling the world back in the 60's and 70's. He went through Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, all the way to Burma where he spent time building a boat which he sailed to Australia. He had a lot of stories to tell of helpful, intersting people he met along the way. Occasionally, he ran into trouble, but nothing life-threatening. Now, of course, such a monumental journey would be suicidal from the get-go, even for Canadians. So yes, the NSA got caught doing what its mission statement mandates--protecting the American people from all foreign threats. I wish the world were as it once was, a much friendlier place, but it's not and we have to accept that and take the necessary precautions.

    October 21, 2013

    At a recent Texas KKK meeting, Senator Ted Cruz was overheard to apologize to the Grand Wizard or Dragon or whatever fairytale character he's calling himself these days for his failure to bring down the "black devil's government." The wizard was not happy; nonetheless, he patted Cruz on the head and bade him "better luck next time, son." Feeling deservedly chastised but nonetheless inspired by the pat, Cruz and his anally retentive co-conspirators have decided to put the business of running the government--the reason they were elected and sent to Washington, DC--on hold while single-mindedly pursuing the vacuous course of trying to lynch Obamacare, as they call it, a vendetta pandering to the neurotically narcissistic fascist faction of the Republican Party.

    With the zeal of your average self-righteous and inflexible practitioners of religious fanaticism--NASCAR Evangelists, e.g.--Cruz's cult has completely committed itself to the aforementioned obsession, abandoning corporate benefactors and special interest groups as though they didn't matter. At a secret location in the woods outside city limits their unwavering campaign to repeal Obamacare was sanctified by blood ritual involving chickens and possibly even a goat. Rumors state a human was sacrificed, but that's too absurd, really. However, the on-scene undercover investigative reporter stated she was bedazzled by Cruz's otherworldy charisma and transcendental oratory, its mesmerizing Baptist intonation blurring her perception of reality and nullifying her rationality. Emotions welled up to the point where she forgot why she was there. The available drugs may also have had something to do with it.

    October 11, 2013

    Let's step back for a second, folks. Take a deep breath. What is going on with our government? Speaker John Capone Boehner and Ted Nitti Cruz are trying to extort the President of the United States. This is unprecedented. There is no constitutional law designed to deal with this. Consequently, we all stand helplessly by, unable to do anything about it. Our representatives are non-responsive; they're living in their own private oblivious world, as anal retentive as any ultra-conservative, rigid-minded, self-righteous evangelist would be when being force-fed evolution. We're not just talking about a right wing faction of the Republican party intimidating, somehow, the rest of its members, it's an attempt to alter the way our government runs. It's a corruption of the responsibility each member of Congress has sworn towards the American people. If the president caves, America will never be the same. Business as usual will take on a whole new meaning.

    Government employees on furlough will be paid retroactively. So what does this mean? It means that we the people, especially, we the taxpayers, are being denied government services--everything from Alaska crab fishing permits to state parks to 'head-start' programs to websites--while still paying for them. How does this help the budget? The House Republicans have cut off services to the American people and will turn them back on again only if the president, somehow, cancels, neutralizes, rescinds a law that the Supreme Court has already validated. A small fanatical racist faction is trying to dismantle the country from within. Why is this insanity legally allowed to continue?

    September 29, 2013

    As our government disintegrates and fragments into an impotent, ineffectual memory of its former self, we the people sit helplessly by wondering in utter amazement at the stupidity of our elected officials. The way it's set up, the Affordable Care Act is going to be funded NO MATTER WHAT. Boehner and his comrades are trying to appease, or ingratiate themselves to, the far right of their party. Why? What the hell is really going on in front of our eyes? Terrorism? An extreme self-destructive act by people whose racist hatred for our president has become psychopathic?

  • Robert Reich

    Press Releases: U.S. Congress Newsroom

    Republican John Boehner's scheduled colonoscopy had to be postponed when it was discovered that his head was in the way. No one who knows him was surprised; it explains his muffled tone of voice.

    At a recent gathering in the Hamptons of the Have You Kicked A Puppy Today? club, co-founder John Boehner, Grand Wizard of the House of Representatives, let it slip that his fondest wish is for a 30-foot-high bronze statue of his butt to be placed in the foyer of the United Nations' building. A congressional committee has been convened to discuss it; they have nothing better to do with their time, apparently. It was suggested by the Chairman of the Tax Loophole for the Top One-Percent committee that monies be diverted from less important matters like food stamps and medicaid to pay for its construction. The motivation, though not explicitly stated, seems to be that foreign dignitaries and representatives will know at a single glance just where America is coming from. Boehner is America and America is Boehner. Kiss that, world.

    September 21, 2013

    For the 42nd time the Republicans in Wonderland have attempted to dissolve the Affordable Health Care Act. If only they got paid by the job, they'd all be living on food stamps and sharing studio apartments. They're hanging the whole country up in the air--as though there wasn't enough to stress about already (Colorado?)--and they just don't give a shit. Surely, they must be breaking some terrorism law; isn't it one of the aims of terrorists to spread anxiety, insecurity, and loss of confidence in the government? Boehner claims to be "protecting the American people from Obamacare." Protecting. Protecting people who have pre-existing medical conditions from getting health insurance, very admirable. Making it almost impossible, Republican state by Republican state (most notably, Florida), for health care Navigators to help people understand how the program works and what their options are, how considerate. Undermining, sabotaging the quality of life for all Americans is their objective, and at that they are most passionate. These are our representatives. We voted them in to look out for our best interests. And here they are, the Republicans under John Boehner, doing whatever the hell they can get away with to make life more difficult than it already is. May God have mercy on their souls; I sure don't believe they deserve any.

    September 16, 2013

    Okay. Syria is using chemical weapons on its people, indiscriminately killing hundreds including children. Stockpiles are most likely hidden underground throughout the more desolate regions, never to be found. Russia has been sending and continues to send Asaad weapons, on the one hand, and on the other, appearing to act responsibly, although everyone--you can feel it creeping up the back of your neck--involved in discussions between the United States, Great Britain, France and Russia is just wating for Putin to pull some shit. Threats to attack if Asaad doesn't comply can't be taken off the table in spite of Russian demands, so we have a standoff on that point, a very large point. Colorado has been experiencing Biblical floods; it's like the Apocalypse. People died, many are missing and unaccounted for. Homes are gone, knocked off their footings, washed away and destroyed; at the least, water and mud damaged beyond repair. At the Washington D.C. Navy yard, a man goes berserk and kills several. Why? Nobody knows and probably never will.

    Meanwhile, the Republican Congress is spending its time--the government will default in two weeks because the budget is not yet resolved--on yet another attempt--I think this is the fortieth--to undermine and repeal the Affordable Care Act as well as hold more committee hearings on the Lybian Consulate attack, trying to find someone--hopefully, the President, from their perspective--to blame for the four American deaths. The social chaos in Lybia at the time, within which the attack played out invisibly, masked by the mayhem, can't be discounted. No one could have seen it coming. We, our intelligence apparatus and military experts, were outsmarted, plain and simple. But instead of accepting that, the Republicans in Congress, in their arrogance and neverending obsessive need to throw dirt and accusations of incompetence on our president, insist that it could've been prevented, and so they must find fault.

    During the Reagan administration, 299 American and French servicemen [220 marines, 18 sailors and three soldiers] were killed by two truck bombs in Beirut. According to Wikipedia: "Shortly after the barracks bombing, President Ronald Reagan appointed a military fact-finding committee headed by retired Admiral Robert L. J. Long to investigate the bombing. The commission's report found senior military officials responsible for security lapses and blamed the military chain of command for the disaster." No one accused Reagan of administrative failure.

    But the Republicans of today are attempting to use the Lybian incident to discredit Obama himself, as though he was personally responsible. What planet are the Republicans living on? How do they manage to get through the day on their own? Obviously, they need watchers, managers, people who assist them in everyday chores. Perhaps we can trust they have no problem going to the bathroom, but is that true?

    A Boy's Prayer

    Let us pray that some day soon the Republicans in Congress will wake up and realize that the country is going down the toilet and all the people--even the filthy rich ones--are in jeopardy. And with this sudden epiphany, they become instilled as though from God with common sense. Let us pray that the Far Right loses its stranglehold on them, and like a rubberband, they snap back into the mainstream where most of the rest of us live, struggle, cry, and wonder how people whose health insurance for themselves and their families is fully paid for by we, the taxpayers, could act so irresponsibly and selfishly.

    Hot Off The Press - July 26, 2013

    "Paul Ryan just popped out of hiding and backed another round of crippling and indiscriminate cuts. This isn't just some budget plan -- a growing gang of Republicans are calling for a government shutdown unless they can get major cuts to Medicare and a complete defunding of Obamacare. If Ryan and the Republicans get their way, almost nothing is safe. Not education or the EPA; Medicare or Social Security. There is one thing sacred to Ryan -- the yachts his billionaire buddies can buy with their cushy tax breaks." [Democrats 2014]

    The right-wing Republican Party in the House has become the enemy of the people.

    John Boehner, you remember him, neo-conservative reactionary presently acting as the Speaker of The House by default, has recently proclaimed the mission of his Republican bretheren: "We are not here to pass laws, we are here to repeal laws."

    July 25, 2013

    Senator McCain's knee-jerk and predictable advice as to Syria is completely wrong-headed. He wants to supply the rebels, the opposition, with weapons and moral support. Well, right now there are different rebel gangs, ad hoc self-organizing factions, fighting amongst themselves, competing for PR-space on the media, so who do you choose as the one and only representative of the anti-government forces? You don't just hand out guns to whoever speaks the loudest or can come up with someone fairly articulate to act as leader. Besides which, I'm guessing they probably have enough guns available in the first place. After all, it is the Middle East. I say we stay far far away from the whole scene.

    The Arab League consists of 22 countries, a union that seems to be rather ineffectual. Although Syria was suspended from the League for its repressions of protestors, the League's monitoring mission fell apart in spite of good intentions. However, it's their responsibility; it's their family of people. If they don't care about the Syrian-caused instability in their own neighborhood, the tragic deaths of tens of thousands and the displacement of millions of fellow Arabs, then why the hell should we?

    The right-wing of Congress, aka the Republican Party, has decided it would be in America's best interest to gut the Environmental Protection Agency, already severely limited in scope and undermined by loopholes and injunctions. Enforcement powers have been rendered ineffectual and agents needed to investigate possible infractions are in short supply. As usual, however, their motives are transparent. They represent wealth, coroporations, mining companies, all the industries whose excrement after production of whatever would definitely harm the environment, air, water, forests, and all the animals who live therein. It costs them money to have to comply with EPA regulations.

    Why not let unfiltered soot and particulates belch out of coal plant chimneys, like in China? Why not let nuclear power plants manage their own radioactive waste? Why not let fertilizer and toxic pesticides be washed off the fields and down into the streams and water table? Why not let mining companies and smelters soak the earth with heavy metals and acidic solvents left over from processing? The slag, it's called; sounds like what it is. Why not just shit on everything for the good of business, and to hell with the country and the people living downstream of it all. There's no soot or slag mills in the Hamptons, so who cares? Live for now, and let future Americans figure out how to clean up the mess, to counter its effects, and save what's left of America.

    The Republican Party, in particular, the House, used to be, or can be, a voice offering a different direction to choose. And when the situation demanded a non-partisan approach, they would usually act sensibly. But now, they are nothing more than obstructionists and saboteurs. Their role is to undermine the president, no matter what. The hollow, meaningless yet symbolic vote against Obamacare--38 times to date--is the most outrageous testament to their sick and twisted hatred of Mister Obama. They offer nothing positive of their own, they serve only to block any agenda put forth by the current administration, even when it serves the good of the majority of the middle class, or especially then.

    Why 50% of the voting population supports the Republican Party is a genuine mystery to me.

    May 30, 2013

    Former President George W. Bush recently donated his complete collection of Doctor Seus books to his library. He insists that their importance lies not in his confessed affection for the fond memories they evoke, but as a botttomless source of wisdom influencing his major decisions during his terms in office. God bless America.

    April 18, 2013

    Republican senators voted against the gun control bill that would require universal background checks for gun purchases. What unprincipled cowards. Going against the will of 90% of Americans, to boot. Scumbags. I guess what has to happen is something tragic and gun-related to one of theirs, as usual. It has to hit home for them to stand up for what's right.

    April 9, 2013

    Once again the Republicans in Congress, in particular the fourteen senators who've promised to filibuster any debate on gun control legislation--in spite of the fact that 90% of Americans want such--have blatantly demonstrated their racist attitude and personal hatred of Barak Obama. Their controlling base, as they allude to it, consists of waspish, arrogant, aristocratic old money, people who trace their roots back to the Plymouth Rock invaders. The very idea of a black man as president sticks in their crawl. These senators have stalwartly (anal-retentively) decided, out of loyalty to an inflexible belief in white superiority, that all politics, all fairness, and all questions of right and wrong can be dismissed as irrelevant. What matters, for better or worse and in complete denial of what the people want, is that any domestic program or legislation sponsored and put forth by the president should be crushed out of hand and thrown on the scrap heap. They don't even bother, in their own arrogance, to hide their contempt anymore. Their mission is to undermine and discredit his presidency by their adamant obstructionism, so that, after this last term, they can point to his record and say at their exclusive get-togethers, "See what little he accomplished? What a poor performance he turned in, he couldn't get anything done; never again should we elect a non-white person to that office, they're just too lazy."

    It's a sorry time for America when a lofty and honorable government body, the U.S. Senate, should be held hostage by such despicable and unworthy men, men of low character and base values. They need to be booted out, for the good of America.

    Here are the 14 Republican Senators

    And here are the Complete Email Addresses for all Members of Congress, the House, the Senate, Governors, and State Legislators

    March 14, 2013

    Lately, the Republicans have been trying to change--talking about it, anyway--their identity from defenders of the monied class--200,000 new millionaires came onboard here in America in 2011--and screwers of the middle and poor to... what exactly? They are at least aware that their right-wing, anti-abortion, ultra-conservative, evangelical base isn't going to be enough to win the White House.

    I envision those people--the mysterious and invisible base--as being older than the hills, possibly immortal, having consumed copious amounts of an elixir of longevity discovered by captive scientists working in a warren of underground laboratories somewhere deep in the Alps. These are shadowy, decrepit, scary vessels of their former selves. Creepy, but powerful, in control of the leadership of the Republican Party. Our base, they refer to them as, without actually naming them -- these obscure unknowable phantasms of petty hatreds and narrow-minded, narcissistic, mean-spirited ambitions, braking progression at every turn. May they wither away some day; at least, may their power to dictate the course of America fade to oblivion. They are old-school, old-politics; what we need are new approaches and perceptions of reality. Now, not decades from now, after we've beome a second-class economic country.

    In the article about the new millionaires:

    "George Walper, president of Spectrem Group, said the results show that weak financial markets
    and the slow recovery in real-estate (especially investment real-estate for the wealthy) held back growth.

    “'We’re still not back to pre-crisis levels,' he said.
    He added that while the optimism of millionaires is increasing, 'these folks are still worried.'"

    My, my, those poor fretting millionaires. I feel sorry for them, truly. They might have to let go a staff member or two. Maybe a pastry chef will have to be laid-off; assuming, of course, he's documented in the first place. Next stop, the local Hamptons food bank, I suppose.

    A new story about millionaire growth, March 15: 300,000 New Millionaires in 2012. The number of millionaires in the country is nine million, almost at the level before the recession, while the working class continues to lose jobs and opportunities. What gives? If you're a stock holder or real estate investor, you win. So, over the past two years, the number of millionaires has increased by 500,000. The gap doth widen. The middle class doesn't exist, hasn't really since the late eighties, as far as I saw. Used to be a ladder going from poor to rich in this country; that ladder is now gone. The Republicans, and others, speak about the middle class, but they're talking to an empty house, aspirers only.

    I looked at over a dozen web-news sites for this story about the increase in millionaires, and almost all defer to Robert Frank, an economics reporter for CNBC. And also they refer to the Spectrem Group. In fact, most of them simply copied the story from CNBC. In other words, the news we hear about the current financial situation comes from only one or two sources. Who is the Spectrem Group and why does Robert Frank have so much influence?

    Misleading information: 53% of Americans invest in the stock market

    Fact: 10% of Americans own 80% of the stock, and also, it can be presumed, are the major investors in real estate.

    Robert Frank paints a rosy picture about the economy. Despite the working-poor getting poorer, because the stock market continues to grow--an illusion based on inflated values, I think--the economy is growing. For whom? His assessment is based on how the rich are doing. The rich don't take their earnings and invest in small business or anything else that might help the vast majority of Americans, they invest in transnational corporations and money-making schemes: stocks, bonds, commodities, instruments, derivatives, real estate, and other things about all of which I know next to nothing. It's a global stock market affair, individual countries have little meaning, except as places to stash large amounts of cash unreachable by the IRS and the SEC. They invest around the world, they live in that economy and identity as world citizens. They don't identify with being Americans, why should they?

  • Inside Wealth | Edited by Robert Frank
    • Ryan Plan Could Give $400,000 Tax Cut to Top Earners
      "The top one percent of earners – those households making more than $575,000 – would see their taxes fall by an average of $225,000. Those making $1 million or more a year would see an average tax cut of $408,000 a year."

      "'The changes specified in the budget would reduce revenues by nearly $6 trillion over 10 years," said Roberton Williams of The Tax Policy Center. "That's a big revenue hole that has to be picked up somewhere else.'"

    March 3, 2013

    According to the dictionary, sequester means: to take over; confiscate; seize, especially by authority. An enigmatic term for what is presently happening in the country, orchestrated by the Republican Congress. What exactly are they confiscating? Taxpayer dollars? Millions of Americans will be affected by forced budget cuts, from people losing government-based jobs to children in Head Start programs and on and on. It's a ripple effect. If workers at a ship-building facility are laid off, for example, local businesses will suffer. A restaurant where they used to frequent will probably have to lay people off. A waitress with children won't be able to care for them as well as before. Hardware stores, grocery stores, clothing stores, suppliers, trucking outfits, warehouse personnel, the same deal. All businesses in the affected area will feel the pinch, all across the country. It's a mess, and in the midst of it, on deeper levels the real problem is not being addressed.

    News programs like CNN and MSNBC and local news outlets are not talking about it; they seem to be distracted and obsessed with the political partisanship angle, the White House versus the Republican Party, their anal retention and purposeful obstruction designed to undermine. Representatives, who no one outside their respective districts has ever heard of, are making television appearances, spouting tidbits of explantions as to how it can all be rectified, if only their side, their point-of-view was understood and accepted by the people. They smile and say it's not their fault, it's the President, he just doesn't get it. It's mass obfuscation. I can't help feeling, listening to these nobodies, that their trying to sell me snake oil. Smarmy doesn't begin to describe the creepy feeling I get crawling up my spine. What is going on behind this phony window dressing?

    Practically every congressman and woman in the House has managed to successfuly put forth pork-barrel agendas designed to help them get elected, catering all the while to special-interest groups. The spending that needs to be cut is precisely that, unnecessary programs and bogus infrastructure projects, bridges to nowhere. Even the Pentagon has no use for many of the so-called defense programs currently under way, pet congressional projects that satisfy egos in the name of national security; that's where the defense budget could use some shaving, but there's no danger of that, they're not even on the table. The military's budget is inflated with extraneous and, for the most part, operationally unrealistic propositions forever in the testing phase. Current congressional business is a cesspool of deception and sleazy underhanded dealings masquerading as functioning government.

    I stare at it as one whole mishmash as it churns and slithers like a snake pit. The House Republicans are bound and determined to break the confidence of the people in the President by holding our lifestyles and our capacity to realize what should be reasonable expectations hostage. The effects of this sequester on necessary services, on programs designed mostly for the poor and working class, and on government-related jobs will--has to--ripple through the entire country. It's ridiculous for them to attempt to convince anyone that their intention by so doing is to save the economy. How does that do that?

    They refuse, anally, to close tax loopholes and raise taxes on the superwealthy and corporations that register profits in the billions. Refuse. Sequestration, witholding budgetary appropriations, allowing the government to default, will inevitably impact millions of people, while protecting private pork-barrel programs and projects, most of which are extremely costly and irrelevant, and shows them--members of Congress--to be the hypocrites they are.

    Congress is dysfunctional, to put it mildly, and, as a group, doesn't seem to be interested in working towards the good of the country. Who are they working for? They're a mess, and the whole lot of them, Democrats included, need to be booted out and a whole new regime put in place. Matters simply can't go on like this; the status quo of business as usual is leading us down the spiraling path to implosion and a serious depression. Congress is blind and childish and out of touch with reality. Self-centered, obsessed with their own petty myopic agenda, the Republican Congress is hell-bent on sinking the country just to prove who holds the upper hand.

    Well, the fact is, we the people hold the upper hand, and, if there's any justice in this world, they'll find that out at next election time.

    Inside The Republican Party

    [Disclaimer: Indirect intermediaries speculating on hearsay reported by third-party sources electronically eavesdropping on random cellphone conversations have conclusively ascertained that the following can only be untrue if the evidence supporting the purported facts can be surmised as based on misrepresentations of motive and intent by the subjects concerned; misconstrued extraneous or artificially fabricated information is solely the responsibility of the perpetrators; otherwise, we may assume reasonable and undeniable plausibility.]

    OBSTRUCTIONISM, the main strategy and basic tenet of the Republican Congressional manifesto, has enjoyed considerable success; the spineless, floundering incompetence of the Democrats notwithstanding. The concept of a manifesto above and apart from the U.S. Constitution was originally inspired by a secret committee within the Party Central, an off-shoot of the Illuminati, who, over the years, have met periodically at undisclosed locations arbitrarily chosen so as to avoid media attention. Their existence was suspected only after the Reagan administration's trickle down economic theory, clearly intended to favor the wealthiest Americans, proved too impractical and stupid for words. It could only have been the product of minds whose inbreeding over many generations had turned them to mush.

    Due to the classified nature of the material, the recent FBI leak that the current group are children of former members of Hitler's Inner Circle has not been substantiated; however, it is true that prior to actual meetings, videos of small animals being tortured to death are part of the bonding ritual. Afterwards, snacks are served along with warm beer to wash down the human remains, one of a host of acceptable solutions for the illegal immigration problem, although not to everyone's taste, it must be said. At meeting's end a video is played of activities ongoing at one of several clandestine Southwest mining operations where homeless people are bused daily. They need the exercise and it keeps them out of trouble.

    Coercion by threat of scandal or worse was the chief motivator two hundred years ago when the country was just getting underway; although, threats proved unnecessary as greed was more than sufficient to keep everyone concerned in line. Nowadays, with the advent of modern technology, and as a mandatory part of the initiation ceremony, each member has a tiny semiconducting nano-processor surgically implanted in his brain. As a result, when certain keywords or phrasing is heard having to do with government programs and initiatives formulated to help the majority of Americans, a brief but intense jolt of micro-electricity courses through what is left of their cerebellums, generating a cascade of neuronal activity which eventually finds its way to their mouths in the form of self-serving, disparaging words.

    Subsequently, an encrypted minute book is sent to each and every Republican congressperson by courier. After assimilation of what are considered correct thoughts, the Republican Congress is deemed ready for its next session.

    As a consequence, they have become masters of double-speak. To wit: they insist they are helping America return to its former greatness and prosperity by pretending that all those who earn less than 250,000 dollars a year don't exist. It makes the math simpler. Every proposal the Democrats put forth is accused of being irresponsible, short-sighted and un-american. The Republicans, for their part, have nothing reasonable to offer as counter proposals, at least nothing that makes any sense. Spending budgetary funds repairing and renovating old Veterans hospitals is their favorite example of Democratic waste. All that's necessary, they contend, is to string veterans out on drugs and send them home.

    When asked by an interviewer why the extremely wealthy continue to enjoy Bush tax breaks, they reply that it would hurt the poor and working classes if said taxes were rescinded. You see, the wealthy need to have as much money as possible, they insist, in order to invest in various stocks, bonds, commodities and other so-called financial instruments. If not, the working poor would suffer because small business owners wouldn't be able to hire them. What! Like that's been happening. What the hell do small business owners have to do with the superwealthy? Where's the connection?

    Manchurian candidates all. Anyone watching one of these absurd demonstrations has to wonder if they are truly insane or just out of touch with reality. They believe the viewer, the taxpayer, the American citizen is just too ignorant and gullible to see past the bullshit. After all, they reason, and rightfully so -- what do poor people and the working class know about Wall Street?

    Oil companies realize record earnings, as do most Republican-protected corporations, plus receive substantial subsidies while the price of fuel goes up. When questioned about this, the CEOs respond that they need the extra cash for research, or say that most of their operations are in some other country. Duh? Isn't that the purpose of the tax-paid subsidies -- research? And what difference does it make where they happen to be extracting oil, the point is how much revenue they're making.

    They deliberately obfuscate and mislead, imagining their ivy-league cleverness far too polished to be perceived for the nonsense it is, but your average street person has no problem seeing through the deceptions and outright lies, the mis-quotes and selected facts, the bogus-based arguments . Unfortunately, seldom does anyone with serious influence ever call them on it. It's a sham, a vaudeville show, intended to convince America that their representatives are working diligently on their behalf, protecting them and going after those who, through sheer arrogance, are ripping them off.

    The Republican Congress chooses not to lead, but to manipulate by pressing buttons they don't really believe in. Like the spoiled frat boys they are, they not only undermine true leadership but also snicker at the discomfort and pain their self-centered irresponsibility and reckless indifference are causing the majority of Americans. They block any leadership and, in their twisted way, claim they do so for the good of America.

    Whose America?

    ** Number of Millionaires Soars to New High -- CBS Money Watch

    * According to which economist is handing out stats, if the Bush/Cheney tax cuts for the rich and super-rich were revoked, repealed, rescinded, it would put between 850 billion and one trillion dollars in the nation's treasury box. That would go a long way towards paying back the money we've borrowed from China for the wars. Let the rich pay for most of it. After all, it's the middle classes and poor people who are doing the fighting and dying while they continue to prosper in spite of the serious worldwide recession.

    It would be far-fetched and ludicrous to equate the Republican Congress with the military junta ruling Myanmar/Burma; nonetheless, with only slight exaggeration, there are similar patterns having only superficial political differences. It's a question of degrees. Because there is no rule of law in despotic Burma -- the people have no real legal recourse or ownership rights -- the thugs in charge collude with the wealthy tycoons for their own benefit. Similarly, the Republican Congress conspires with the wealthiest segments of our society, openly and arrogantly.

    It's easy to continue with this comparison. What the tycoons in Burma and major Chinese, Thai and Korean investors, wealthy corporations and international capital [especially with respect to mining operations], are doing in the name of development results in devastating environmental impacts: Dam construction; deforestation; threats to endangered species, either directly or by loss of habitat; and water, soil and air polution. Additionally, these destructive pursuits further result in livelihood elimination and community/culture dissolution. The Republican Congress would similarly like to gut, if not completely eliminate, the EPA and reduce pollution standards across the board. It's a matter of record that they've been actively attempting to curtail, if not outright revoke, both the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act in the name of economic growth. They would also like to open protected federally-owned land to logging and mining, and to hell with the rivers, the fish and all the creatures who dwell therein, endangered or not.

    Without any reasonable doubt, the current Republican Congress is not only the most corrupt, but also the most morally and ethically bankrupt on record.

    Thomas Adrian Dorn

    ** Irrawaddy Myitsone Dam International Rivers

    CNN Interview with President of the National Rifle Assocaition, David Keene

    During an interview with CNN, the leader of the NRA explained that the thousands of urban dwellers who own assault weapons need them to hunt "coyotes and other varmits." The interviewers let that pass without questioning its likelihood, nodding knowingly. Apparently, encounters with packs of coyotes in New York city are more of a problem than I thought. The interview ended on a jovial note; could be CNN is as much in the pocket of the NRA as is the Republican Congress. Although, it's sad to say, many Democrats have received substantial contributions from the second-amendment group as well.

    It was the schoolyard all over again. For all the intelligence and interviewing skills Wulf Blitzer brings to the table, he's still a nerdy punk confronted by the Grand Wizard of the NRA, David Keene, an arrogant bully. If, instead of Mister Blitzer, the interview had been conducted by a BBC reporter, I think Keene would have been shown for the pompous, pretentious, petty, ignorant jerk-off that he is.

    I grew up in Philly, but I've spent more than half my life living in the country, rural Alaska for 13 years and most of the rest in Western Washington. And, I've known hunters, especially in Cordova. They hunted, not for sport but for subsistence, for them and their families, to help get through the long winters. None of them would even think to go hunting with an assault rifle. I remember, many years ago, hearing about some cheechako killing a deer with an automatic, banana-clip 22. He completely destroyed the meat, not much was left to eat. Moreover, I've never known or heard of anyone who hunted for "coyotes and other varmits" with any kind of rifle.

    Now, ranchers hunt animals they consider 'varmits,' like wolves, who prey on their livestock, or might prey on their livestock. Preemptive eradication of species is a time-honored tradition amongst us humans. Such people don't have the time or inclination to care about things like species extinction, the bottomline is everything. But how often do they go after "varmits," really? Once the local pack of wolves or coyotes is either wiped out or run off, the hunters can hang it up. And do they need to have assault rifles for the job?

    Assault rifles have one purpose and one purpose only: To kill as many people in as short a period of time as possible.

    P.S. -- If you live some place in America where you feel the need to have an assault rifle (basically, a machinegun) for personal protection, then you should move, maybe to Iraq or Afghanistan.

    [Doctor Archibald Fleming, Curator of the Political and Historical Archives at Mount Olympus University in Hasbro, West Virginia, observed the following at a recent alumni colloquium and luncheon:]

      "During the period immediately after the Revolutionary War and that of 1812, single-shot muskets and canon balls were state-of-the-art in weaponry. With the memories of the Wars fresh in the minds of the new United States of America, the concept of a "Citizen Army," to thwart any tyrannical ambitions the fledgling government may have, made sense and, I believe, actually acted as a deterrent to any such evil inclinations. However, in our modern era, it is not the case; that is to say, it has no deterrent value and is, in fact, ludicrous.

      "If all the militias in the country along with all well-armed and patriotic individual citizens were to gather together to form an ad-hoc citizen army in order to combat a tyrannical-leaning government, for whatever reasons it may have become such, controlling the now existing military, which, for the most part, accepted the rationalizations of the government for imposing martial law over the nation, a single battalion of Marines or Army, supported by attack helicopters and fighter jets, could easily decimate the aforementioned citizen army in less than a day."

      He paused to refresh himself with a drink of water, then continued, "So, to my mind, and I believe to that of any thinking and sensible individual, the current argument for allowing people to obtain assault rifles and any other weaponry designed to kill mass numbers of people is completely and utterly without intelligent base. No modern citizens army could possibly stand against a government, with the support of the military, at least in part, turned against it. The argument is moot on every level, and for the powers that be to acknowledge it as substantive and convincing is a transparent attempt to confound the gullible, fuel the paranoid and ignorant, and a testament to how far politicians are willing to go in order to continue receiving the financial support of organizations purporting to stand for the Constitution and prepared to defend it.

      "Clearly, those members of Congress whose constituents, in majority numbers, belong to the NRA, and who therefore owe their political careers to the NRA's influence over their respective citizens, have a personal and self-serving agenda. In their defense, it needs be said that they're between a rock and a hard place because of the way our government works. As duly elected representatives, they must speak for the majority of the people from their states. And in those states where a majority of citizens--those same people who voted them in and sent them to Washington DC--belong to the NRA, they are necessarily constrained to abide by their will, regardless of how they themselves might feel personally, what their conscience tells them, or what they believe is the right direction for the country, what the proper and timely thing is to do. That is, the right thing to do is not always available, if only because of sheer ignorance and irrational fear.

      "Nonetheless, such pettiness, cowardice, and backward application of power, in the face of sporadic tragedies where innocent people, especially children, are killed by weapons of mass destruction is nothing less than reprehensible and beneath contempt."

      Doctor Fleming opened a book before him and said, "Francis DiRagio wrote in his critique of modern american society, The Edge of Madness:

        'All people need in order to pursue madness is the moral support--resonating with and amplifying the perceived moral imperative--and justification by respectable people in power and influence, be they political, religious, or militaristic. Patriotic fervor is easily fanned to the point of religious zeal; heroism transcendent, the true believer's ultimate cause is the continuation of his nation for which he stands and which gives him identity. The Constitution is held with more reverence in the lives of men and women than is the bible or any analogous text. And all that's needed for the people in power to create that social context, that milieu of potential, is the support of and collaboration with a quasi-religious organization like the National Rifle Association.'"

    Excerpted from a Washington, DC press conference with Speaker of the House, John Boehner:

      Reporter: "Mister Speaker, what's it like to have lived your entire life without the benefit of a human brain?"

      Boehner: "I don't miss it. I don't believe I'd be any other way than how I am had I had a human brain. In fact, from what I've experienced first hand here on the Hill over the years, it really isn't all that important."

      Reporter: "Would you say that your fellow Republicans and you are on a mission?"

      Boehner: "Mission? No, I wouldn't. It's more like,..., a calling. Yes. Our calling is to block any and all legislative action and to derail confirmations coming out of the White House. We meet at regular intervals--the location is undisclosed to outsiders--where we design our programme for Obstructionism. The main treatise is rather lenghty, but it acts as the base from which we plan strategy and tactics."

      Senate Republicans Block Hagel Nomination | February 15, '13

      Reporter: "Why does it seem that all your efforts are intended to curtail government programs and assistance to the middle, working and poor classes?"

      Boehner: "Isn't it obvious?" he chuckled. "Our mandate is to protect the rich and large, international corporations. We have no truck with the middle class and especially have no time for poor people. Their money, what they have of it, goes towards survival; they don't contribute any to reelection campaigns, so, who cares?"

      Reporter: "The cost of higher education has skyrocketed in the last two decades, particularly the last several years. And yet, both House and Senate Republicans have made it more difficult for those who can't afford a university education by cutting budgets for government assistance programs, grants and loans. Why is that?"

      Boehner: "Listen, our think tanks have aided us greatly. For example, they've discovered that in India, poor people are not allowed to have dreams. There's a lesson in that. We need a permanent labor pool; there's lots of menial work to be done. Putting univeristy education out of the reach of the poor and cutting government funding and grants for the middle and working classes ensures that only children of the well-to-do will be among the educated class, as God intended."

      Reporter: "Why are you and your fellow Republicans so opposed to universal health care? The citizens of the European Union, as well as Canada, have full medical coverage. It seems to work well for them. Why not here?"

      Boehner: "Well, c'mon. Those countries don't have anywhere near the defense budget we have. Our military spending far exceeds the entire European Union's, for Christ sake. If we were to cut into some very necessary military programs in order to cover the medical needs of those unable, or unwilling, to buy insurance, we'd open ourselves to attack, we'd be endangering those very same people who can't take care of themselves. Besides, it's socialism, and that's not what we're about here in America. Independence, self-reliance, competition, making your own way on the backs of others. We're not commies, never will be."

      Reporter: "But sir, what country would dare attack us?"

      Boehner: "Hah! You are naive, young lady. North Korea and Iran, for two. And what about all those countries in Africa, huh? And don't forget China, an up and coming heavyweight militarily. How would you like it if your children or grandchildren had to learn Mandarin? And I wouldn't completely rule out Canada either. They are, after all, just across the border, and they all smoke pot, so you never know what they're up to."

      Reporter: "For North Korea or Iran to attack us would be like Bangladesh attacking India. North Korea can't even feed its own people, they're starving, how could it afford to wage war agains the United States? And as far as China goes, if they attacked us, who would pay back our enormous debt? And who would do the attacking? Seven hundred million of them are farmers."

      Boehner: "Well, listen, you obviously are not privy to the classified material that I am so you just don't know what's going on behind the scenes. Bottomline, if poor people want health coverage, let them join the military."

      Reporter: "Are you aware, sir, that the latest Pew survey puts the approval rating of Congress at nine percent?"

      Boehner: "Really? Well, that's unfortunate; however, I'm not surprised. The American people need to realize they have only Obama and his administration to blame. If the White House would send us what we ask for, cooperate with our agenda, we'd do something besides what it is that we do. It's his fault."

      Reporter: "What it is that we do? What exactly is that? Republicans in both legislative branches don't submit anything for consideration, they have no counterproposals, they spend all their time and energy undermining the President."

      Boehner: "Undermining? No, that's a misperception. We seek compliance, short of that, we have no choice, that is, we are forced to adopt an adversarial position. It's unfortunate, truly, but that's the way it has to be. Now, we'll have to cut this short; I'm very busy."

      Reporter: "One more question, please, Mister Speaker. You and your fellow Republicans, both in the House and Senate, are only doing the American People a disservice by refusing to act on anything put forth by the President. You've become the Do-Nothing Congress. Doesn't that bother you?"

      Boehner: "What bothers me is the deplorable condition this country presently finds itself. Anxiety and insecurity are running rampant. If Mister Obama would only wake up, confront reality, recognize that we have no intention of looking beyond our own partisan self-interests, and concede the rule of government to us, life in these United States would improve remarkably and almost overnight. We steady ourselves on our principles as they shift with the wind, and for the good of America, we will never unclench our assholes."

      Reporter: "Say what?"

      Boehner: "Say what, indeed."

    September 7, 2013

    Dear Senator Murray,

    I voted for you, support you, and now I have something to say. I've never written to a senator or representative, this is the first time because I think it's important enough to add my voice to those with whom I agree.

    I am totally, 100 percent OPPOSED to intervening in Syria in any military capacity whatsoever.

    I think it's time the Arab League stepped up to the plate and took responsibility for the actions of one of its members. Even though Saddam Hussein was no threat to us, trigger-happy Bush got us into Iraq with a lie about weapons of mass destruction, he played on the fears of Americans. As a result, many american lives have been lost, children growing up without their fathers or mothers because of his overzealous war-mongering. And are the Iraquis any better off? He took advantage of the momentum generated by invading Afghanistan. Besides the lives of both Americans and Iraquis, many billions of dollars have been wasted on the expedition. Now, Congress, in particular the House Republicans, have cut the budgets for needed programs and regulatory agencies like the FDA and the EPA. They want to dismantle Social Security, Medicare and SNAP, the food stamp program. Our infrastructure is in a shambles, our country is hurting, and yet, the President, who I voted for twice and support completely otherwise, is being pressured by not only the nutjobs in Congress like McCain and others, but the world at large to intervene in Syria. Who cares what Israel thinks, we don't work for them. If they're outraged or worried, let them do something about it.

    I heard this congressional Republican named Messer on CNN the other night spouting the usual rhetoric "Syria is the enemy of America." Trying to play on the emotions and fears of americans is what Bush and the Congressional Republicans did to garner support for invading Iraq. Treating 'we the people' as though we were easily manipulated morons. Don't they know they live in a fishbowl and everybody can see what they're up to?

    Sadaam Hussein was no threat to us. I did not expect to see his republican guard landing on the beaches of New Jersey or his 'air-force' bombing our cities. Likewise, I don't expect the president of Syria to launch an invasion anytime soon. I believe, as I did for Iraq, that Syria is no threat to us which is the only reason to justify invading another country. Sadaam used gas on his people, the Kurds, and no one did anything about it. He used gas on the Iranians and no one did anything about it. I am deeply sorry for the Syrian people, especially the children; so much hatred in the air, but I don't believe we should get involved militarily. We've had enough war for the past twelve years, we are not the world's policeman. The world is trying to use us as a patsy, we shouldn't let them.


    Thomas Adrian Dorn

    Say What?

    Asked about the American public's uneasiness about getting involved in another conflict, Kerry reiterated his view that the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict was a threat to the U.S.